Where to pee?

Oh, . . . if one does get to use a stall, . . . DonDiego requests one leave a rating:



Quote

Originally posted by: DonDiego
It's called a FUD.

Oh. Like a Shewee.

Published reports say that porn site xhamster is denying service to supporters of the North Carolina law. When you go to the site, you ate asked of you support the law. Answer yes and they bounce you.

All this talk about FUDs and SheWees got me to googling.

One learns new things almost every day at LVA.


Lettuce, Green beans, Brocolli, Turnip Pride.
A porn site blocks NC and our squinty bastard of a governor makes partial changes to HB2. There would not be nearly the outcry over it without the further sweeping changes it enacted. It's far from just the media hyped "bathroom bill". My hope is the damn thing is the catalyst to getting all the bastards out of our state legislature.
Quote

Originally posted by: jatki99
Quote

Originally posted by: malibber2
Quote

Originally posted by: jatki99
The NC law and the resulting accusations and boycotts, not to mention the companys that are having a tizzy about it is absolutely ridiculous. Will it really and truly scar Bruce Jenner for life if he can't take a leak in the womens room? or the woman who really, really wants to take a dump in the mens room? What the hell is the world coming to? Seriously, where to relieve oneself is actually a national concern/debate/fight in this age? Aren't there bigger things to be concerned about than where someone takes a shit?

What's to say some freakozoid isn't just stalking some mother and little daughter, waiting for them to go into the restroom when he whips out a dress, puts it on, follows them in and attacks them? There's so, so many things that could go wrong here I can't believe it's even an argument.

I'll say it again, does it really matter that much, where a person relieves themselves? Is it really a matter of national concern?


What is the world coming to? The next thing you know the colored’s will be wanting to drink out of the white’s only water fountain.


I'm surprised at that one MAl, maybe not a lot, but some. Those two things have absolutely no comparison whatso ever. I hate to call it a really dumb comparison my friend, but it really is.



I respect you immensely, but you are wrong on this. Your hypothesis is that it is unreasonable to complain about this law. The truth is it was unreasonable to pass the law. It was done as I understand it without any prior debate or notice. They just literally passed the thing within a few hours of announcing it. Then the governor immediately signed it while giving himself a high five and publically gloating about how he and his conservative cohorts pulled one over on people that would oppose such a law by not giving them a chance to oppose it.

The Federal Courts have already ruled on some of the issues in the law, so at the very least they knew or should have known that as a best case they were going to have to shell out millions of taxpayer dollars to defend the law and that they were likely going to lose those lawsuits on the merits. They should have also been able to look at the numbers from Indiana and quickly determined the law was likely going to cost the state in excess of a 100 million dollars in economic damages. I believe they looked at both of these things and said F it we are warriors for Jesus, and we will do as we please. So the idea that these poor old good old boys from North Carolina are being unfairly treated just isn’t true. They knew exactly what they were doing.

Who really gives a damn if a lady that looks and is dressed as a man comes in and uses the men’s room or a man that looks and dresses as a lady sits down in a stall and relives himself in the ladies’ room?

The argument these good old boys seem to be making is that if we let Tranny’s use the ladies room straight heterosexual conservative males will soon be demanding the right to use the ladies room with your wives and daughters. And heaven help us if these straight repressed conservative males get let into the ladies’ room because apparently they are so repressed if a lady is defecating, urinating or changing her tampon in the next stall they can’t be held reasonable for what they do to said lady because those excretory functions get them so worked up.

Then you get to the practical side of things. Is the state of North Carolina going to post State Troopers in every public restroom to inspect the genitals of folks trying to use the restroom? Does everyone using a public restroom in the state of North Carolina have to carry their long form birth certificate into the restroom with them so they can prove they have the right to use said restroom?

Quote

Originally posted by: malibber2
Quote

Originally posted by: jatki99
Quote

Originally posted by: malibber2
Quote

Originally posted by: jatki99
The NC law and the resulting accusations and boycotts, not to mention the companys that are having a tizzy about it is absolutely ridiculous. Will it really and truly scar Bruce Jenner for life if he can't take a leak in the womens room? or the woman who really, really wants to take a dump in the mens room? What the hell is the world coming to? Seriously, where to relieve oneself is actually a national concern/debate/fight in this age? Aren't there bigger things to be concerned about than where someone takes a shit?

What's to say some freakozoid isn't just stalking some mother and little daughter, waiting for them to go into the restroom when he whips out a dress, puts it on, follows them in and attacks them? There's so, so many things that could go wrong here I can't believe it's even an argument.

I'll say it again, does it really matter that much, where a person relieves themselves? Is it really a matter of national concern?


What is the world coming to? The next thing you know the colored’s will be wanting to drink out of the white’s only water fountain.


I'm surprised at that one MAl, maybe not a lot, but some. Those two things have absolutely no comparison whatso ever. I hate to call it a really dumb comparison my friend, but it really is.



I respect you immensely, but you are wrong on this. Your hypothesis is that it is unreasonable to complain about this law. The truth is it was unreasonable to pass the law. It was done as I understand it without any prior debate or notice. They just literally passed the thing within a few hours of announcing it. Then the governor immediately signed it while giving himself a high five and publically gloating about how he and his conservative cohorts pulled one over on people that would oppose such a law by not giving them a chance to oppose it.

The Federal Courts have already ruled on some of the issues in the law, so at the very least they knew or should have known that as a best case they were going to have to shell out millions of taxpayer dollars to defend the law and that they were likely going to lose those lawsuits on the merits. They should have also been able to look at the numbers from Indiana and quickly determined the law was likely going to cost the state in excess of a 100 million dollars in economic damages. I believe they looked at both of these things and said F it we are warriors for Jesus, and we will do as we please. So the idea that these poor old good old boys from North Carolina are being unfairly treated just isn’t true. The knew exactly what they were doing.

Who really gives a damn if a lady that looks and is dressed as a man comes in and uses the men’s room or a man that looks and dresses as a lady sits down in a stall and relives himself in the ladies’ room?

The argument these good old boys seem to be making is that if we let Tranny’s use the ladies room straight heterosexual conservative males will soon be demanding the right to use the ladies room with your wives and daughters. And heaven help us if these straight repressed conservative males get let into the ladies’ room because apparently they are so repressed if a lady is defecating, urinating or changing her tampon in the next stall they can’t be held reasonable for what they do to said lady because those excretory functions get them so worked up.

Then you get to the practical side of things. Is the state of North Carolina going to post State Troopers in every public restroom to inspect the genitals of folks trying to use the restroom? Does everyone using a public restroom in the state of North Carolina have to carry their long form birth certificate into the restroom with them so they can prove they have the right to use said restroom?


I think you have completely missed the main concern. That concern would be the male perverts of the world going in the bathroom after young girls or women.
I'm thinking of becoming a shewee distributor. This market is ready to pop.
Quote

Originally posted by: Roulette Man
I think you have completely missed the main concern. That concern would be the male perverts of the world going in the bathroom after young girls or women.
The ones who dress like women, but really want to rape them? I wouldn't want them in the men's room either.

Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now