Which is more combustible the iPad 3 or the Chevy Volt?

https://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/story/2012-03-20/ipad-heating-consumer-reports/53675154/1

Consumer reports is investigating the iPad 3 now, but their initial reports indicate the iPad 3 could heat up enough to burn you. I can only wonder if our own consumer sleuth her at LVA (DD) will be on the case as well?
That happened to my Blackberry Curve

Quote

Originally posted by: Kumquat
https://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/story/2012-03-20/ipad-heating-consumer-reports/53675154/1

Consumer reports is investigating the iPad 3 now, but their initial reports indicate the iPad 3 could heat up enough to burn you. I can only wonder if our own consumer sleuth her at LVA (DD) will be on the case as well?



I can hear it now:

"WE ARE ALL GOING TO BE BURNED TO DEATH, AND THEN THE WORLD WILL END!!!"

This is what happens when you let the private sector pick winners and losers in the economy.

Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
This is what happens when you let the private sector pick winners and losers in the economy.


Damn laissez-faire capitalism.
Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
This is what happens when you let the private sector pick winners and losers in the economy.


North Korea announces the new I-pad, 9000 complete with the first superconductor as invented by their scientists more than 3 decades ago.


Kumquat's reference, USA Today, states:
"Testers at Consumer Reports found that the latest iPad could hit 116 degrees when running games. 'When it was at its hottest, it felt very warm but not especially uncomfortable if held for a brief period,' wrote Consumer Reports' Donna Tapellini, who held the iPad in her hands during testing."

So as to "Which is more combustible the iPad 3 or the Chevy Volt?", . . . the Chevy Volt has caught on fire 3 times, if DonDiego's memory serves him. The Apple iPad3 is warm to the touch, perhaps as much as 13 degrees Fahrenheit hotter that the Apple iPad2; to date there has been no incidence of combustion or injury.


DISCLAIMER:
__DonDiego has no financial connection to Apple Computer, Inc.. The issue of "Warmgate" will likely have no impact on him.
__DonDiego has no connection whatsoever to General Motors other than his pro rata portion of the shares held by the Federal Government; these shares represent a loss. The impact of "Combustiongate" on DonDiego is expected to be minor.
__DonDiego possesses no iPad, iPod, or iPhone, . . . or any other similar product from another manufacturer.
__DonDiego thinks he is lucky just to have a Mac Mini and a MacBook and two Samsung cellphones in the house for use by teechur and himself.
Quote

Originally posted by: DonDiego The Apple iPad3 is warm to the touch, perhaps as much as 13 degrees Fahrenheit hotter that the Apple iPad2; to date there has been no incidence of combustion or injury.

.


There's about 1000 dead Chinese workers that might refute that statement.
Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
There's about 1000 dead Chinese workers that might refute that statement.
DonDiego thought the discussion was about the combustion characteristics of the Chevy Volt vs the Apple iPad3. He apologizes.

On January 15, 1919, in the North End neighborhood of Boston, Massachusetts in the United States, the Purity Distilling molasses storage tank burst, and a wave of molasses rushed through the streets at an estimated 35 mph, killing 21 and injuring 150 persons.

Subsequently there were about 125 lawsuits filed against the United States Industrial Alcohol Company, which had purchased Purity Distilling in 1917.
There were so many lawyers involved, that there wasn't room enough in the courthouse to hold them all, so they consolidated and chose two to represent the claimants. Altogether, more than 3,000 witnesses were examined and nearly 45,000 pages of testimony and arguments were recorded. The defendants spent over $50,000 on expert witness fees, claiming the collapse was not due to a structural weakness but rather to a dynamite bomb.When Auditor Ogden made his report, he found the defendants responsible for the disaster because the molasses tank, which was fifty-eight feet high and ninety feet across, was not strong enough to withstand the pressure of the 2,500,000 gallons it was designed to hold. In other words, the "factor of safety" was not high enough.

And so the owners of the tank paid in all nearly a million dollars in damages—and the great Molasses Case passed into history.

DonDiego invites other posters to report on any public, private or corporate accidents or malfeasance, whether historical, actual, on-going, or possible-in-the-future so as to clarify the question of combustibility of the Chevy Volt vs the Apple iPad3.

Quote

Originally posted by: DonDiego
Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
There's about 1000 dead Chinese workers that might refute that statement.
DonDiego thought the discussion was about the combustion characteristics of the Chevy Volt vs the Apple iPad3. He apologizes.

On January 15, 1919, in the North End neighborhood of Boston, Massachusetts in the United States, the Purity Distilling molasses storage tank burst, and a wave of molasses rushed through the streets at an estimated 35 mph, killing 21 and injuring 150 persons.

Subsequently there were about 125 lawsuits filed against the United States Industrial Alcohol Company, which had purchased Purity Distilling in 1917.
There were so many lawyers involved, that there wasn't room enough in the courthouse to hold them all, so they consolidated and chose two to represent the claimants. Altogether, more than 3,000 witnesses were examined and nearly 45,000 pages of testimony and arguments were recorded. The defendants spent over $50,000 on expert witness fees, claiming the collapse was not due to a structural weakness but rather to a dynamite bomb.When Auditor Ogden made his report, he found the defendants responsible for the disaster because the molasses tank, which was fifty-eight feet high and ninety feet across, was not strong enough to withstand the pressure of the 2,500,000 gallons it was designed to hold. In other words, the "factor of safety" was not high enough.

And so the owners of the tank paid in all nearly a million dollars in damages—and the great Molasses Case passed into history.

DonDiego invites other posters to report on any public, private or corporate accidents or malfeasance, whether historical, actual, on-going, or possible-in-the-future so as to clarify the question of combustibility of the Chevy Volt vs the Apple iPad3.


That molasses tank case was one sticky situation. Didn't that disaster mark the end of using molasses for a particular product? (I'm thinking sugar, but I may be mistaken)
Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now