Logout

Question of the Day - 26 July 2012

Q:
Seems like the Stardust has been closed long enough that Boyd Gaming should have done the one day casino gig like Trailer Station. Have I just missed it, or is it covered by some other rule?
A:

There are two, slightly differing explanations. The Stardust’s gambling entitlement expired along with the building, hence no need for a "Trailer Station." As the Nevada Gaming Control Board’s Marie Bell explains, "This location closed in November 2006 and has not had gaming ... since then, therefore they would not be grandfathered and have to meet all current requirements," just like most other brand-new casinos. "Anyone who wanted to have a gaming license at that location would apply and go through the entire process," Bell elaborates. "If they applied for a non-restricted license, they would have to meet all current requirements, including minimum number of hotel rooms, etc., and whatever the local jurisdiction requires."

In this case, the local jurisdiction doesn’t require eight-hour casinos, which is why none are ever seen on the Strip. According to Boyd Gaming spokesman David Strow, the Strip is designated "a special gaming zone," unlike locals casinos which may abut residential neighborhoods, car dealerships, etc. So, if you’re the owner of, for instance, the old New Frontier site, there’s no pressure to develop, since the underlying gambling-enabled status of the land is there to stay.

No part of this answer may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, without the written permission of the publisher.

Have a question that hasn't been answered? Email us with your suggestion.

Missed a Question of the Day?
OR
Have a Question?
Tomorrow's Question
Has Clark County ever considered legalizing prostitution?

Comments

Log In to rate or comment.