An LVA source pointed us toward Cox Communications (which services many of the casinos, but Cox’s manager of communications, Juergen Barbusca, was somewhat loath to talk to LVA. "These are things that are arranged between Cox and the hotels we serve. These are not for discussion in a public [arena]." He likened buying large-scale Internet service to purchasing a car, with the hotel-resort playing the role of the dealership that is deciding which costs to pass on to the consumer, and which not. Hence, the policy varies from property to property, sometimes even within the same group. Note, also, that our recent inquiries have revealed that the resort fee often covers the in-room usage of one device only, i.e., if you and your traveling partner both wish to use your laptops in the room, one of you will be charged an additional fee on top of the resort fee.
For example, until last January, Main Street Station offered a free Wi-Fi "hot spot" on property for guests, then Boyd Gaming switched to Cox and axed the hotspot, so now Wi-Fi is only available in the rooms, for a flat rate of $9.99 for 24 hours (that's the same as pre-Cox, but the options of $1.99 for an hour, or $49.99 for a full week, have been discontinued along with the free "hotspot.") Unlike some other Boyd properties, Main Street Station does not charge a resort fee, so the choice to pay for Wi-Fi or not remains with the customer.
Asked for comment on its resort-fee policies, MGM Resorts International responded with what looked suspiciously like a form letter it would send to any guest. "Resort fees are common in many major U.S. and international travel destinations," it began. "Las Vegas hotel rooms offer top value for their room rates and resort fees."
"The resort fee saves guests both time and money by bundling commonly requested services and amenities in one low daily charge," MRI continued. "As far as Internet charges, Internet service is covered at most MGM Resorts' properties under the resort fee. The hotels have built a very complex, hi-tech infrastructure," the statement rationalized, blaming the supplemental fee on "costs involved in maintaining and enhancing the system, in order to provide ongoing dependable service to guests." As for dunning you for that in-room, land-line phone, "Not all guests are likely to use all of the services listed under the resort fee," MGM dryly noted. Most other casinos ignored LVA’s query, having already taken a fair amount of grief for "resort fees" in recent years.
Interestingly, your inquiry reminded us that, back in January of this year, we received an official press release from MRI, excitedly stating that under a new deal with Cisco Systems, the company was rolling out free property-wide Wi-Fi at all of its Las Vegas resorts (with the apparent exception of CityCenter). We quote:
"Admit it. We’ve all become completely reliant on mobile devices, including cell phones, laptops, tablets and smartphones. When traveling, whether for business or pleasure, the mobile devices are in hand and we expect to connect, regardless of where we are.
"Understanding the needs of the mobile user, MGM Resorts International (NYSE: MGM) collaborated with Cisco Systems (NASDAQ: CSCO) to create a high-density Wi-Fi system designed to enhance the guest experience. The two companies have developed the highest-performing wireless LAN in the industry, allowing travelers with multiple wireless devices to enjoy quality Wi-Fi. The new high-tech capabilities put MGM Resorts ahead of the curve with the ability to meet guests’ ever-evolving expectations...
"...Advantages of the program include 30 percent faster connectivity resulting in longer battery life used by mobile devices, automatic Wi-Fi connection that eliminates user hassle, and delivery of customized, relevant and timely offers and information delivered directly to guests’ mobile devices.
"The Wi-Fi rollout at MGM Resorts’ destinations in Las Vegas began with Bellagio, MGM Grand, Mandalay Bay and The Mirage, all completed at the end of 2012. Additional Las Vegas resorts, Monte Carlo, New York-New York, Luxor and Excalibur, will install Wi-Fi in 2013. The installations cover the low-rise public spaces – including pools, casinos, lobbies and restaurants – any place a visitor may wish to have mobile service. The Wi-Fi rollout for guest rooms has begun at MGM Grand, with completion expected in March 2013; installation for Mandalay Bay is scheduled next, and other resorts will follow.
"While visiting one of these resorts, guests receive complimentary Wi-Fi in the public spaces with the option to upgrade to higher bandwidth, ensuring that everyone has the mobile experience they want. Hotel guests and meeting attendees enjoy upgraded Wi-Fi."
Curious as to why we'd heard nothing further about this project, and how it might affect resort fees. (If a guest of the hotel -- or a non-paying guest off the street -- can wander into the hotel lobby and check their email for free, for example, would hotel guests still be obliged to pay the same resort fee for their room, when one of the chief amenities it's said to cover is Internet access? If the Wi-Fi in the room is "upgraded," what does that mean, especially if the free Wi-Fi everywhere else is already 30 percent better than the average Wi-Fi, and so on.)
So, we placed some calls to different staff at the various properties mentioned in the press release, and here's what we were told:
We sent a query to MRI asking for clarification about this feedback we received, and how it ties in with the press release, but we have yet to hear anything back. We'll keep you posted as and when we do.
Rather than build "complex [high]-tech infrastructure," some casino companies look to single-source outside providers and then pass the cost on to you. In the Vegas area, the vendor of choice is believed to be Cox, dominant in both cable-TV and Internet-access provision. "We provide connectivity to the individual hotel property. We’re a back-end provider … a segment in the chain of providing a business to the consumer," explained Barbusca, speculating that some of the larger casino companies might be acting at as their own ISPs. In any event, he said the service-and-cost equation could not be broken down as simply as it is for a residential bill.