Logout

Question of the Day - 08 December 2013

Q:
I think it would come as a shock to a huge percentage of readers that the southern boundary of the City of Las Vegas is Sahara Avenue. Has there been any thought to adjusting it to include the 80 to 90 percent of casinos NOT in Las Vegas?
A:

When one considers that the City of Las Vegas ranges all the way west to the 215 Beltway and as far north as the fringes of Mount Charleston, it’s not lacking in casinos for its tax base. However, it is no secret that the higher tax cost of doing business within the city lines is a powerful incentive to keep one’s developments in unincorporated Clark County.

Despite seeing so much money being made at its doorstep, Las Vegas has made no move to annex additional, casino-enriched acreage in the last 15 years. If it did, the pushback would be fierce. Even relatively simple attempts to exercise eminent domain within the city have resulted in bitter and protracted litigation. To attempt a land grab of the dimensions you suggest would require an audacity that even ex-Mayor Oscar Goodman never showed, even at his fiercest.

According to Michael Green, professor of history at the College of Southern Nevada, "The city looked into it in the late 1940s. That's what inspired the legislation that permitted the creation of Paradise and Winchester townships -- the Strip bosses didn't want to be annexed, so the legislature granted their wish. Consequently, an unincorporated township can be annexed only with voter approval."

No part of this answer may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, without the written permission of the publisher.

Have a question that hasn't been answered? Email us with your suggestion.

Missed a Question of the Day?
OR
Have a Question?
Tomorrow's Question
Will there ever be sports books or betting kiosks in airports?

Comments

Log In to rate or comment.