Question of the Day - 5 July 2017

Quite frankly I have never really thought about it. Not even a big fan of "tramp stamps". However, body piercings  are weird and disturbing, but they are not tattoos. 

Is this really serious in this century? I don't have any tattoos, but I don't believe it's legal and I'm sure it's not moral to have that kind of restriction on hiring. Is my tan too dark? Is my hair too bushy? Are my fingernails bitten? or too long? Please!! They better not be able to get away with that anymore.

C'mon, in "Sin City"? I agree with the post that it depends on the hotel, and the tats should be "tasteful" (no nudity, vulgarisms, etc.). Piercings?- Absolutely not.

Depends on the casino (or restaurant) and the tattoo. In the kitchen, who cares? Serving food or dealing the tables, I'd say you'd want the players concentrating on the food or the table play and not the tattoos.  What's even worse than a tattoo is someone who looks like they were swimming and got caught by a fish hook in their nose or above their eye. It's like they shook off the line, but the hook got stuck. THAT, to me, looks tacky anywhere.  

I wonder whether Hervé Villechaize had any tattoos.   :-)

To those of you who say "depends on the casino", why should a place have the right to discriminate just because they consider themselves "high class"? And as far as individual likes and dislikes, one man's ugly (or distasteful) is another man's beauty. And if they can discriminate against potential employees, they could do the same to customers. And would your tone be different if they banned something about you?

If God wanted me to have a tattoo, He would have put a "Born On" date on my ass like a bottle of Budweiser. All these thing are billboards for attention whores. "Ooohhh look at me, look at me...."