I was having a friendly argument with my niece about the percentage of a 9/5 penny machine with the progressive at $1,200, e.g., equivalent quarter machine at 6000 coins. I ran the 6000 coins through my Bob Dancer analyzer routine and found the game at 100.23. She ran the same 6000 coins through her Bob Dancer analyzer routine and her number was at 99.50. Two questions. 1. Which number is correct? And 2. Why are the two numbers different? Could it be that we are using two different versions of Bob Dancer software?
[Editor's Note: Bob Dancer answered yesterday's question. And today's.]
The only way a penny game with a $1,200 royal flush is equivalent to a 6,000-coin royal in a quarter game is if the penny game requires 20 coins to fully load. If this isn’t true, both of your numbers are wrong.
You didn’t say which game you were playing. This makes it a lot harder to check than just knowing the 9 and 5. Checking 9/5 Jacks or Better with a 6000-coin royal returns 99.53%, which is close to your niece's result.
How you got 100.23% is a mystery. I'm betting it's some sort of user error. I suspect you put the 6,000-coin royal flush on 8/5 Bonus Poker rather than 9/5 Jacks or Better. That brings you to 100.2358%. While I would call this 100.24%, some people may call it 100.23%. If this was indeed your error, once you switch to 9/5 Jacks or Better, the numbers you and your niece get will align.
Different versions of my software do not explain this error. They all figure simple things like this correctly. What the software cannot do, unfortunately, is make sure the user is analyzing the game they want to analyze.
|
Lotel
Feb-18-2022
|
|
Kevin Lewis
Feb-18-2022
|
|
Brent
Feb-18-2022
|
|
Roy Furukawa
Feb-18-2022
|
|
Haskell Deutsch
Feb-18-2022
|
|
Kevin Lewis
Feb-18-2022
|
|
O2bnVegas
Feb-18-2022
|
|
Anthony Curtis
Feb-18-2022
|