Logout

Question of the Day - 09 September 2024

Q:

I have some follow-up questions on the Tropicana site. Do you believe John Fisher has the private financing to pay for his share of the new MLB stadium? Do you believe the new MLB stadium will be built by him or perhaps someone else? Or does the thought of John Fisher privately financing his share for a new MLB stadium seem about as believable as a unicorn winning the Kentucky Derby?

A:

[Editor's Note: This answer is provided by our inimitable business writer, David McKee. The opinions expressed herein aren't necessarily those of management.]

And the winning unicorn is … !

Seriously, there are shirkers and then there’s John Fisher. The man has a net worth of $2.1 billion and he’ll be damned if he puts one red cent of it into a new baseball stadium, based on his conduct so far. He spent years going through multiple Oakland mayors and moving the goal posts, to mix a sports metaphor. of what it would take to keep his cellar-dwelling team in the Bay Area. He’s proven no easier to pin down in Sin City.

If Fisher gets the vanity park he craves, it will probably be by suckering someone else into building it for him. Since Gaming & Leisure Properties owns the underlying land, it’s first in line to take the dive. 

In the unlikely event that GLPI decides to sell the land instead, don’t look for Fisher to buy it. We’re talking about 35 acres of prime Strip real estate that will go for top dollar (upwards of $1 billion). The jeans billionaire didn’t get rich by spending money on his baseball team, obviously, and he’s not shown the inclination to part with any long green — not even the $100 million that would trigger a public subsidy — to get a stadium built in Las Vegas.

Fisher would need to part with at least $850 million, presumably to be recouped from luxury skyboxes, sky-high tickets for the average fan, and pricey beer and popcorn. However, not only is Fisher spectacularly disinclined to open his own wallet, the firm he hired to scrounge up investors (Galatioto Sports Partners) has come up empty. As did Fisher’s offer to sell pieces of the team to prospective minority investors, who would have the privilege of paying for the stadium instead of Fisher. No takers on that one either.

The Athletics have asserted that various financial institutions are “excited” to lend $300 million. That excitement and seven bucks gets you a cuppa Joe at Starbucks. Not only is excitement not fungible, $300 million doesn’t even come close to getting the job done.

Also, the $380 million in public dollars that Fisher extracted from Clark County is contingent on the private-sector largesse that Fisher hasn’t been able to conjure up. Fisher’s mouthpieces claim they won’t need all $380 million, but that’s easy to say at this stage, with no cost overruns looming in their faces.

Ditto the supposed participation of Bally’s Corp., a company that has roughly $150 million cash on hand and is tapped out as a borrower. Bally’s made the grand gesture of “donating” nine acres to the A’s, but it wasn’t Bally’s land to give and the plan (taken for granted locally) that Bally’s will build some synergistic resort beggars credibility. Bally’s talks big, but is awash in debt, is going through a buyout that will leave it even more indebted, and couldn’t finance its Chicago megaresort without being rescued by GLPI.

Fisher having effectively taken himself out of the picture, the stadium will all but certainly be built (if one is built) by a third party, possibly on a different site. The Rio is willing to cannibalize some of its back acreage (of which it has plenty; our office looks out onto the entire lot) to put up a ballpark and it appears that it could be done there. 

Then there’s the huge collection of unused real estate that Station Casinos owns a mile to the west of the Tropicana site. The former site of the Wild Wild West was originally the site of the A’s stadium, but since that would've cost actual money, that deal quickly disappeared after Bally’s Chairman Soo Kim offered up the land he doesn't own. 

Ultimately, this whole mess lands in the lap of MLB Commissioner Rob Manfred, architect of the present crisis. He queered the pitch for Oakland, putting a heavy thumb on the scales of the negotiations, in part by making it clear he wanted the Athletics moved to Sin City, all other considerations be damned. 

Since his agenda was Vegas-and-nowhere-but-Vegas, we have nobody better than Manfred to blame for the standoff between a pinchpenny owner and the banking industry.

As for Vegas itself, it wanted baseball in the worst way — and that’s how it’s going to get it, if at all.

 

No part of this answer may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, without the written permission of the publisher.

Have a question that hasn't been answered? Email us with your suggestion.

Missed a Question of the Day?
OR
Have a Question?
Tomorrow's Question
Has Clark County ever considered legalizing prostitution?

Comments

Log In to rate or comment.
  • Jon Anderson Sep-09-2024
    A's new ballpark
    Ok here's my question to LVA...If they build on the Rio site, what's in it for you ?? You obviously have hinted in the past about your excitement on having the ballpark so close...Will you have some "Wrigley field" free viewing area that you can kick back, down a few brewski's and watch the games from your front/side/back or rooftop porch ??? Maybe give you a chance at making a crap load of money in parking fees from your adjacent office property on gamedays ??? Increased value of your office property (i am assuming you own it) to your bottom line ??? Just wondering...Thx

  • Sandra Ritter Sep-09-2024
    I have an idea
    Why doesn't he team up with the White Sox and their owner, Reinsdorf, who wants a new stadium to replace their 23 year young stadium, and move the Sox to Vegas too. They can together try to con others into paying for a new stadium for them. Or he can buy the Sox, who surely would be going for a bargain price right now, seeing as they're 78 games under 100. Just a thought.

  • Randall Ward Sep-09-2024
    Fisher
    Fisher earned his $ the old fashioned way, born to rich parents.  

  • Bart93491 Sep-09-2024
    Not worth the effort
    Any owner who can't / won't spend money to have a winning team merely wants a "vanity project" but will never bring a winner to town. It's hard to follow a losing franchise with no hope of winning. (I'm from Pittsburgh, and following the Pirates has been an excruciating ordeal.)

  • Lucky Sep-09-2024
    My bet
    My bet is that a stadium will never be built.  A Vegas baseball team will not draw spectators to the field, when the temps are over 90 degrees and in the sun.  And the cost of a covered stadium is way more than financing can handle.  And how much will it cost to cool that in the 120 degree heat? And who will go see a losing team anyway? No stadium will be built, the A's will stay where they are, or a slight chance they move to another city, but not Vegas. Oakland may put money into the stadium, but that is as far as it goes.  A new resort will be built on the Trop site, but being in my 70's, who knows if I will live long enough to see it.  

  • John Sep-09-2024
    Good Work McKee!
    Like Bart, I am a long suffering Pittsburgher.  I am following this Fisher Flim Flam closely because it is the same con that was run on we 'Burghers when we bought a rich man a vanity stadium.
    
    I also agree with Lucky...I would have to wager against in being built at all.  
    
    And Jon...I am not certain why you posted.  Kind of snarky and well...dumb.

  • Raymond Sep-09-2024
    Bart and John
    Don't give up hope.  I lived near Da Burgh as a kid in the mid-Sixties, and the mantra about the Stillers was, "They've never won and never will."  My first NFL game was a 30-0 loss to the equally awful Redskins at Pitt Stadium.  Times change, attitudes change, never give up hope!
    
    BUT I can see where A's fans could be tempted to give up, even if they have moved all the way up to 4th place.  I'm not that sympathetic to them, given that they got their team by carpetbagging back in '67.

  • Fred Oyang Sep-09-2024
    Finally, the real scoop
    Great summary!  I live here and am tired of the local media shills raving about the A's move.  I've been an A's fan for over 50 years and they belong in Oakland while Vegas should get an expansion team to call their own.  Fisher is a cheapskate and will always be a cheapskate. 

  • stephen rosol Sep-09-2024
    too bad trop had to go without a real plan
    too bad Trop could not stay put until there was a real plan.  Too much wiping away, and too much excess--and we all pay for it.

  • John Sep-10-2024
    Raymond
    Oh yes...I was a kid but a stroll up "Cardiac Hill" was nothing compared to the horrors that "Da Stillers" perpetrated during games at Pitt Stadium.
    
    I have completely washed my hands of the Steelers and the Pirates.  The former was because the NFL is ridiculous.  The Buccos were much harder but I have managed to decompress over the last 6 weeks and am now "clean."
    
    Have a great day Raymond and all here!