I play table games at my local casino and go about once a week. Here is something I have wondered about for a while. Does it make a difference if I cash in my chips before leaving the casino, then buy in for cash the next time I play, or just keep the chips and buy in with them next time I play? I usually buy in for $500 and cash in when I leave, but thinking about cashing in only the winnings and keep the $500 chip for next time. Of course, I couldn't spend the $500 chip anywhere else, but I keep my gambling money separate. I have to wonder, does the casino look at cash as new money and chips as won money or do they look at both the same? Does it make a difference as far as rating or card points?
[Editor's Note: This answer comes from our guy behind the curtain, Andrew Uyal, author of The Blackjack insiders.]
This is a good question that has a couple of ways to answer it, technically and perceptually. Of course, we’ll get into both.
For the purposes of ratings and reward credits, it matters not whether you buy in cash or chips. The rating system simply reads the “In” and the “Out.” The variables that affect your points are the average bet, time of play, and game type, which we’ve gotten into in other QoDs.
Where it does make a difference is on the casino’s MTL (Multiple Transaction Log) and CTR (Currency Transaction Report). I’ll put on my casino hat for just a moment to explain that both of these are logs (and reports) of cash transactions the casino runs every day. The keyword here is cash. Now, due to certain regulations, I can’t say exactly what the threshold is that gets you onto these reports, but that information is readily available from people who are in less precarious positions than mine. I can tell you that if staying off daily reports is important to you, then keeping a stash of high-denomination chips on you is a good idea.
Perception is reality. This is one of my favorite sayings. Let’s talk about perception.
A floor supervisor’s perception is important. He or she decides how you’re rated and determines how much attention is paid to you. The latter is quite important if you’re playing with an edge.
With that in mind, the vast majority of buy-in transactions are cash. I’d go out on a limb and say 85%-90% of transactions are cash buy-ins. Why is this important? Because if someone comes to the table and buys in $1,000 cash, it’s just another buy-in. Everyone buys chips with cash. No big deal there.
But if you show up with $1,000 in chips, you’ve unintentionally triggered a few questions. The floor will instinctively wonder where the chips came from and when. They might even have to verify the play. If they do have to verify play and discover that you’re just moving tables from a few minutes ago, no problem. But if they see that you haven’t played for a few days or longer, it could raise some suspicion.
The main concern is whether the chip or chips are real. Secondarily, do the chips actually belong to the person using them? And if the gambler hasn't played in a while, why didn't he or she cash out? Trying to avoid cash in/out thresholds?
It's fairly common for people to hang onto chips, yes. But it’s far more common for people to cash out every time they leave a casino and use cash the next time, even if it’s the same day.
Moral of the story? Using chips to buy in is convenient and can save you from cash transaction logs. However, if you’re buying in $500 denomination chips or higher, especially more than one such chip, it will almost certainly trigger the “Where did those come from?” thought process.
This information will mean different things to different types of players. Green-chip gamblers who play a few times a year will have a different takeaway than green chip APs grinding out 25 hours a week. Which type of player are you?
|
Doug Bergman
Feb-29-2020
|
|
rokgpsman
Feb-29-2020
|
|
That Don Guy
Feb-29-2020
|
|
Straski
Feb-29-2020
|
|
O2bnVegas
Feb-29-2020
|
|
[email protected]
Feb-29-2020
|
|
Roy Furukawa
Feb-29-2020
|
|
rokgpsman
Feb-29-2020
|
|
ocliffgirl62
Feb-29-2020
|
|
Pat Higgins
Mar-01-2020
|