Logout

Question of the Day - 11 July 2023

Q:

Can you tell me when did casinos stop giving the same cashback/comp percentage for video poker as compared to slots? What casino started this? What made the casinos think there would not be a backlash or do they just not care? I can remember playing 25-cent video poker at Caesars and consistently getting suites (this also may be a glitch when they started their website booking) and tons of comps. Now I'm lucky to earn enough for a cookie.

A:

We dashed this question off to Jean Scott, who tells us, "In my recollection, this change was gradual. I don't remember one specific moment in time when all casinos started separating video poker players from those of other games. If there had been one, it certainly would stand out in my memory.

"The earliest change and one that's still in place in most casinos is requiring more play from video poker players to meet requirements for players club points. That system automatically makes it harder (takes more play) for VP players to get comps. The only casino I know of today, though there might be others I'm not familiar with, that gives VP players the same number of points for the same amount of coin-in is South Point. It's the same reason South Point doesn't have a tiered program and no separate restaurant lines for bigger players. Obviously, the owner, Michael Gaughan, and his partners want to treat every customer the same!

"What I can say is that this change came into play fairly early. It was more of a factor when I wrote More Frugal Gambling than the original Frugal Gambler.  Actually, we didn't know much about this when we started playing video poker. We kind of depended on hosts who would share some of that info.

"Another factor was that for a long time, if you played video poker on machines that had various non-VP games, the casinos didn't have software that could make the distinction. Now they do."

So that's what the Queen of Comps has to say about it. What do all you veteran video poker players remember about when you had to start playing more to earn the same amount of cashback and comps as slot players? 

 

No part of this answer may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, without the written permission of the publisher.

Have a question that hasn't been answered? Email us with your suggestion.

Missed a Question of the Day?
OR
Have a Question?
Tomorrow's Question
Has Clark County ever considered legalizing prostitution?

Comments

Log In to rate or comment.
  • CLIFFORD Jul-11-2023
    yes
    $20 at last check

  • Kevin Lewis Jul-11-2023
    You disgusting video poker-playing filth
    I converted from blackjack to VP fairly late in the game, so to speak--the late 90s. Even then, the casinos were starting to wise up and dial back the goodies, but as Jean points out, their relatively primitive player tracking systems often couldn't distinguish between VP and slot play, especially on a multi-game machine. Now, of course, the bots track everything you do, including the accuracy of your play.
    
    What was always amazing to me was that the machine manufacturers sold VP to the casinos as if the hold would be comparable to slots. I've seen their brochures from back then--they touted, for example, 9/6 JOB as having a 4% casino advantage. They couldn't have been that stupid, so obviously, they were overselling the game to the casinos. And as we all learned, casino slot departments were run by people whose mathematical skills would shame a five-year-old. No mas, of course. Now, they're run by descendants of an unholy union of Ebenezer Scrooge and Dracula.

  • Robert Dietz Jul-11-2023
    Three Bad Processes
    Three bad things happened more or less simultaneously in LV. The vp/slot trend resulting in less vp comps was the last. First was the similar trend where sports and race betting had identical comps. Then sports comps, like vp, were reduced more and more vis-a-vis race. The second unholy trend was discretionary comps being reduced while points and comps became formalized. The third leg was the vp reduction vis-a-vis slots. For comps, the 90's was a bad decade. At some point, I'll do a bitch blog about the simultaneous slide.

  • Ray Jul-11-2023
    when the books came out
    In the beginning, without proper strategy, 9/6 JoB probably DID net the house around 4%. But once people were playing correctly, and then (like Jean), writing books about it, those percentages dwindled. And you can't play the slots "smarter", It's the same thing that happened once proper blackjack strategy became public knowledge. I'm sure that there is a different comp schedule between BJ and roulette too.

  • [email protected] Jul-11-2023
    Kevin, did you really mean to write. 
    Kevin, did you really mean to write: "disgusting video poker-playing filth?" - I don't understand what you meant

  • Trainwreck Jul-11-2023
    Card Pulling
    So would card pulling befuddle the algorithms tracking player efficiency?
    And would it enhance your value to the house by minimizing your wins?

  • Kevin Lewis Jul-11-2023
    To royalflush; to trainwreck
    It's my satirical take on what the casinos think of us now, especially compared to how we used to be treated.
    
    Playing deliberately incorrectly might indeed mislead the algorithm, but it would also cost you money, without any real proof that it had the desired effect. BJ experts had a few "dumb mistake" plays in their pockets that actually cost very little or nothing, especially in negative counts (splitting 3's against an Ace is one I recall), but there really aren't any worthwhile ways to fool the bots.
    
    One reason for that is that the companies who make the bots have employed former AP players as consultants, including one whose name you would instantly recognize if I had the temerity to name him.

  • Trainwreck Jul-11-2023
    Kevin
    Card pulling is not deliberately playing incorrectly. It simply means removing your players card from the machine before you 'draw'. For example, when you are dealt trips, before you discard the other two and hit 'draw', you pull your players card from the machine, thus ending your session as far as your players card is concerned, but not the hand. The resultant hand(s). Any subsequent quads, full houses or even the trips themselves would not be recorded as a 'win' as far as your win/loss is concerned.

  • Trainwreck Jul-11-2023
    Kevin
    Card pulling is not deliberately playing incorrectly. It simply means removing your players card from the machine before you 'draw'. For example, when you are dealt trips, before you discard the other two and hit 'draw', you pull your players card from the machine, thus ending your session as far as your players card is concerned, but not the hand. Any subsequent quads, full houses or even the trips themselves would not be recorded as a 'win' as far as your win/loss is concerned.

  • Kevin Lewis Jul-11-2023
    Oh :)
    Pulling your player's card doesn't work, as the system records your play and results THROUGH the end of the hand during which you pull your card. That feature was added as a direct response to people trying to conceal their winnings by the method you just described.

  • David Sabo Jul-11-2023
    HELLO KEVIN LEWIS
    Let's say that you are playing Scarab slots which I'm sure you Kevin are familiar with. For example you're on a roll and you have scarabs all over the board and you are on your 9th spin. Simply pull the card out and change tickets I don't think what you said is completely correct Kevin sorry. Slot card manipulation done properly definitely works but as you sort of pointed out under limited circumstances. 

  • Doc H Jul-11-2023
    sure
    'It's my satirical take on what the casinos think of us now, especially compared to how we used to be treated.'
    
    oh sure, the good old day retread once again, please. Casinos ALWAYS took your money. Maybe a little slower, did it more politely, smiled a little more, better odds to lose money slower but in the end, keep playing, they take it all. Plus. 
    
    Now one could argue they just take it faster in some aspects and frankly aren't they just being more honest about it now, not stroking the naive into thinking they are really getting something of 'value' in the long run? 'free' rooms? 'free' food? Come on. Those nice fancy buildings, the upkeep, the payroll with tons of employees, don't get built and maintained with giving anything to anyone, ever.