Logout

Question of the Day - 09 February 2020

Q:

Given the rise in legal sports betting, what mechanism do casinos have for laying off bets? In Pennsylvania, for example, casinos in the eastern part of the state doubtless take a large number of bets for the Eagles to cover, while casinos in the western part take a large number of bets on the Steelers to cover.

A:

[Editor's Note: This question is answered by Blair Rodman, co-author of Kill Phil, whose new book Bet Sports is due out some time this year.]

While many people think that sports books simply make profits from their built-in vigorish (and owners of books wish it were that way), the reality is that books are often heavy on one side of a bet and can be forced to accept some risk, although they do what they can to balance the action.

One way they do this is by moving their line on a game getting heavily bet on one side, to attract bets on the other side to help balance the action, although moving a pointspread line opens up the risk of getting middled. For example, if a book moves a line from -3 1/2 to -4 1/2 and the game lands in the middle on -4, the book must pay betters who laid -3 1/2 and those who took +4 1/2, a disaster for the house.  

Another way some books address the issue is to shade their initial lines to anticipate heavy action on one side by local bettors who are fans of and loyally bet on the local team. I addressed this in a previous QoD

Unregulated bookies have a lot of advantages over legal books. One is that they aren't prevented from laying off bets, as legal books are. I have a friend who was a bookie back east and regularly laid off bets to a mob lay-off bookie. It was a good business decision for him, both to keep his business balanced and to get the mob's blessing to do business.

Current laws prevent regulated books from having the option to lay off bets. According to long-time sports book manager Robert Walker of USBookmaking, "... partly due to the Wire Act, bookmakers have woefully [few] options to lay off wagers or hedge risk. It is something we are working hard on at USBookmaking."

As Robert says, legal books are striving to level the playing field with non-regulated sports books, and this is one area that would greatly benefit them. However, legalized sports betting in the U.S. is a young industry suffering a lot of growing pains and how quickly these kinds of issues will be addressed and/or resolved is unknown.

 

Do casino sports books lay off bets to balance their action?
No part of this answer may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, without the written permission of the publisher.

Have a question that hasn't been answered? Email us with your suggestion.

Missed a Question of the Day?
OR
Have a Question?
Tomorrow's Question
Is there any connection between the Las Vegas Ellis Island and the immigration center in New York?

Comments

Log In to rate or comment.
  • Feb-09-2020
    What does the term mean?
    Nowhere in the question or the answer does anyone define the term "lay off bets".  I have no idea what you people are talking about.  How about telling us all what the term means?

  • SoCalDude Feb-09-2020
    Al - Here ya go
    "Laying off a bet": Let's take the recent KC/SF SB as an example. In a "Perfect World" the books get the same amount bet on both sides - collecting the Vig in the process. But let's say a book got $10M on KC and $2M on SF. You can see the book is in big trouble should KC cover. So in this case "laying off bets" would involve a book taking, say, $5M and going to another book and betting it on KC. Now they minimize their risk on KC. If KC wins they covered part of what they have to pay out. If KC loses the book still makes money because of having $3M more on KC than SF after losing their $5M bet.
    This answer it for you?