Logout

Question of the Day - 17 January 2026

Q:

So the IRS reporting threshold is increasing from $1,200 to $2,000 as of January 1. Will this change the design of slot machines? In the past, sometimes you would see a slot machine with a max jackpot set at $1,195 or $1,199, in order to remain under the threshold (albeit these were usually older machines). Are we now going to see slot machines with a max jackpot of $1,995 or $1,999? Do you foresee any other changes coming to the casino floor because of the increased threshold?

A:

The IRS reporting threshold for slot machine winnings, part of the broader tax legislation, marks the first adjustment since 1977 and will be indexed for inflation starting in 2027.

It's true that in the past, manufacturers and casinos capped certain progressive or fixed jackpots just below $1,200 (e.g., $1,195 or $1,199) to avoid triggering hand pays and tax forms. It's possible that manufacturers might design or update games with max jackpots capped at less than $2,000 to keep wins ticket-printable (or credited directly) rather than requiring attendant intervention. We've seen speculation in casino forums about this — "quick-hit"-style machines with a $1,999 top prize to attract more play without the hassle.

However, we don't expect this to be universal, dramatic, or even noticeable in most places. As we saw in our recent answer about the coin-in ratio of slots to video poker, VP is such a minor part of most casino floors anymore that we doubt too many manufacturers/casinos will bother making costly alterations for an $800 change in the reporting requirements. The casino industry was lobbying for a much larger increase to the threshold, upwards of $5,000. That might've engendered more changes, but $2,000 is unlikely to.  

We believe that the bigger impacts will be operational and experiential rather than machine design: reducing interruptions for players and staffing needs for casinos and less downtime for machines from lockups, especially on higher-denom games where $1,200+ hits were common, among other incremental changes. 

 

No part of this answer may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, without the written permission of the publisher.

Have a question that hasn't been answered? Email us with your suggestion.

Missed a Question of the Day?
OR
Have a Question?
Tomorrow's Question
Where did casino shills work in the '70s and '80s and how much did they earn?

Comments

Log In to rate or comment.
  • Bob Jan-17-2026
    Same
    Isn't tomorrow's QOD Really the same as todays QOD? 

  • Doug Miller Jan-17-2026
    I think it’s narrower
    Most 50 cent video poker machines pay exactly $2000 for a royal flush when betting (the five coin maximum, so it would make sense, both from the casino’s perspective and the player’s perspective to lower the royal flush payout from $2000 down to $1999.  Although I’ve never worked for a casino I’ve noticed that a hand pay is quite labor intensive for the casino, and it leaves the machine inoperable for 20 or 30 minutes.  I don’t play the slots too often but I’ve not seen very many where a common jackpot is exactly $2000. 

  • Randall Ward Jan-17-2026
    Adjustment 
    I imagine they won't react, this thing is supposed to be adjusted for inflation. Wouldn't look good either to immediately adjust to avoid tax reporting 

  • Bob Nelson Jan-17-2026
    Wait a year
    Then the inflation adjuster will automatically bump it up over $2000 and take care of the exact $2k jackpots.  Seems like the yearly adjustment might involve a lot of labor for the casinos on a regular basis.