If Credit Suisse holds the loan on Circa, and the D and Golden Gate are being used as collateral, how does this affect them?
It probably doesn't.
We spoke with a trusted Wall Street source and he said that, unless a casino is clearly not going to make it (he didn’t cite the decidedly unlucky Lucky Dragon, but we would), bankers and bondholders will be somewhat flexible coming out of the pandemic. Were Circa to underperform, its extenuating circumstances, such as capacity constraints, would be taken into account, and forbearances and payment restructuring would probably take place.
So we don't believe we have to worry about Credit Suisse seizing the D and Golden Gate if Circa defaults. Banks don’t want to be encumbered with those kinds of assets, as we’ve already seen with the Cosmopolitan, which Deutsche Bank, eager to get rid of it, sold at a loss. Credit Suisse would almost certainly rather keep proven managers like Derek Stevens in place than do something drastic in a crisis.
A crisis might be precipitated by a missed interest payment or disappointing financial returns, although at this point, as we say, that's unlikely. So even if Circa goes south, seizing the D and Golden Gate is a last resort. If Circa does well, which it seems to be doing so far, this is a non-issue.
|
Kevin Lewis
Jan-25-2021
|
|
Dave in Seattle.
Jan-25-2021
|
|
gaattc2001
Jan-25-2021
|
|
Llew
Jan-26-2021
|