My wife and I were just playing blackjack in Colorado. My wife bet $50 (which is a lot for us) in a typical 2-deck game—the dealer had 10 and my wife drew five cards to hit a 17 with which she stayed. The dealer pulled a couple of small cards to also pull a 17. The dealer then pulled my wife’s cards and paid her saying, “Good. You had eighteen”. The dealer moved to the next player, but the pit boss (who was changing decks) pointed out the error and they pulled my wife’s “win” back. My question is: How much leeway does the casino have when they make a mistake at a table game? I’m sure they will all say something different, but as far as Nevada law is concerned, when are you allowed to keep your money, even if you know the dealer made a mistake?
We first went to the Nevada Gaming Control Board to check on any applicable laws, regulations, or policies.
Senior Research Analyst Michael Lawton responded, “In Nevada, the casino has the right to correct mispays, especially as they occur. That is part of a supervisor’s job, to catch and correct mistakes (in the house’s or player’s favor). After a mistake is addressed, if there is an unresolved dispute as to alleged winnings or losses or the manner in which a game was conducted, the regulator should be contacted.”
This is purely common sense and is no doubt the policy in most, if not all, casino jurisdictions: If a mistake is made by a dealer, whether it's in favor of the player or the house, it can and should be corrected, either by the dealer, floor supervisor, surveillance, or player.
The question today is about casino leeway in correcting mistakes. And here's where it gets interesting.
Practically speaking, the casino has all the leeway it wants when it comes to protecting the money and the integrity of the game. It ranges from the scenario described by the submitter of the question, where the boss was standing there and caught the dealer's miscount while the cards were still on the table, so that there was no question about who won and lost, to surveillance reviewing its tape of a hand played many rounds earlier and determining a mistake was made, then the casino taking its money back from a player, or in rarer instances paying off a player, long after the fact. Some version of this happens all the time.
How far the casino goes in rectifying dealer mistakes has a lot to do with its corporate culture and the amount of money in contention. The real sweat shops will take back bets in the two figures and damn the consequences; they don't care how many players they drive away in their piggishness. Classier joints with an understanding of customer service and loyalty and the immutable workings of the house advantage, aren't averse to letting go of bets in the hundreds lost to dealer misplays. To be sure, they'll have a word or two with the dealer and try to make sure mistakes are limited. But the better places, in our experience, chalk up occasional dealer miscues to the cost of doing business and move on.
Now, what about when the dealer, floor, or eye doesn't snap to mistakes, especially when bigger bets are at stake. What's the player's responsibility in such situations?
We dare say most players will keep their mouths shut and take the money. They think: The dealer is the expert trained and overseen by the casino, which also has high-tech surveillance equipment, computers to analyze your play and keep records on you, and tapes for later review. Me, I'm just here to have fun and take away all the winnings I can, not to do their job for them.
Here's another way of looking at that. It's the casino's responsibility to make sure the payouts are correct; it's their business, after all. Similarly, it's the player's responsibility to be paid correctly; if a player is shorted, he or she has to point out the error to get it corrected. Simple enough.
But what if a dealer overpays a player? As we said, most players will probably go with the flow. If a boss appears later to take the money back, there's no reason to argue if you know you were overpaid, and even if you don't, you might not want to go to the effort of making a stink over a single bet. The tape tells the tale, and presumably that's the reason for the imposed correction. In these cases, though, the customer has the right to ask to see the evidence and press the matter, including bringing in Gaming Control, if the casino won't comply.
Some players, on the other hand, will speak up if the dealer makes a mistake in their favor. They see it in black and white, no different than returning any extra money if a cashier in a store hands back too much change. Their ethics simply won't allow them to walk away with money they know isn't theirs just because a clerk or dealer made a counting mistake.
Even some advantage players, though they're not at the blackjack table to have fun, but to take money out of the casino, prefer to do so with honesty and integrity, or even just with an eye on the wheel of karma: The blackjack gods will surely take it back in one way or another.
Of course, ethics aren't necessarily black and white. We could argue long and hard about "right" and "wrong" in a situation where the casino offers a game to the public with rules they set, then disallows certain people from playing because they can assign plus and minus values to the cards. Is it ethical if the house takes advantage of the more ignorant?
Then again, do two wrongs make a right?
And how about certain advanced advantage plays in which a player actually steers a dealer into making payout errors? Is that okay, even in the context of how predatory casinos can be toward their customers? For example, is or isn't that acceptable, given that the casino is handing out free booze in an effort to cloud your judgment? In our store-cashier example, obviously, the supermarket isn't attempting to induce you to make a mistake by plying you with free booze, hoping you'll get drunk and buy $1,000 worth of Fruit Loops.
To summarize, the casino has the right correct mistakes, just like any business, but as usual in the world of gambling, what happens beyond that to rectify misplays constitutes a major gray area.
We look forward to hearing what you all have to say about dealer mistakes.
|
Edward Press
Jun-24-2019
|
|
O2bnVegas
Jun-24-2019
|
|
Dave
Jun-24-2019
|
|
Deke Castleman
Jun-24-2019
|
|
Derbycity123
Jun-24-2019
|
|
ClarkKent
Jun-24-2019
|
|
Dave in Seattle.
Jun-24-2019
|
|
Bob Orme
Jun-24-2019
|
|
kinosh
Jun-24-2019
|
|
Kevin Lewis
Jun-24-2019
|
|
Kevin Rough
Jun-24-2019
|
|
Debra Grimes
Jun-24-2019
|
|
Eric Forman
Jun-24-2019
|
|
Seamans
Jun-24-2019
|
|
Victor Shaw
Jun-24-2019
|
|
[email protected]
Jun-24-2019
|
|
Pat Higgins
Jun-24-2019
|
|
Roy Furukawa
Jun-24-2019
|
|
Jun-24-2019
|
|
IdahoPat
Jul-02-2019
|