Logout

Question of the Day - 30 July 2021

Q:

It seems like the old days, when one company owned the hotel, casino, and many of the restaurants and shops at a resort, are long gone. Virgin’s new casino is managed by Mohegan Sun. The new Resorts World hotels are under the Hilton brands. And many of the old MGM and Caesars properties have been sold off, spun off to other corporations or to private equity and real estate trusts. Caesars seems to be a shell of its former self, bought out by Harrah’s Entertainment, then Eldorado Resorts, and now VICI Properties, which is also buying out the Venetian resorts. And Apollo Global Management has agreed to acquire the operating company of the Venetian. It’s confusing and probably not all that beneficial to the value customer in this corporate-takeover blitz. Does all this combine to diminish the experience of customers at casinos that used to be known for their hospitality, and as a result, lower rewards and comps to both out-of-town visitors and locals?

A:

[Editor's Note: This answer was written by our own David McKee. For most of David's QoDs, he writes them anonymously. But when he hands one in that's this good, we give him the credit he's due.]

Perhaps your (and our) nostalgia for the vertically integrated casino-resort of the past is over-enthusiastic. Casino executives aren't especially qualified as restaurateurs or retailers, speaking generally, and few have excelled as entertainment impresarios (see below). The outsourcing of these functions has probably improved the customer experience. 

For instance, Las Vegas is no longer the place where entertainers’ careers go to die. It's perhaps not entirely coincidental that the alliance of Strip casino showrooms with Anschutz Entertainment Group or LiveEnt coincided with Las Vegas attracting a more heavyweight caliber of headliner, a change of pace that allowed visitors and locals to see the biggest names in show business on a regular basis. Occasionally, a culture-conscious casino owner or executive, such as Steve Wynn, comes along who can program his or her own showrooms, but people like that are very much the exception to the rule.

Similarly, when it comes to dining, casino destinations have become must-do locations for celebrity chefs. True, the restaurants are usually branches of what has succeeded in larger cities. But the Las Vegas dining scene is now orders of magnitude bigger, better, and more diverse than the days when F&B was entirely in-sourced. It wasn't that long ago that the best restaurants in town were cookie-cutter so-called gourmet rooms meant to cater to the high-roller crowd. They were fine as far as they went -- free food always tastes better -- but they weren't exactly paragons of culinary trends. 

As for the casinos themselves, it's true that many are operating on the cheap nowadays. This is attributable to various motives. Some have been congenitally frugal. Others are seeing for how long they can get away with pandemic-era levels of staffing, higher minimum bets, and cutbacks on givebacks, making profit hay while COVID still shines. And others have had draconian economies imposed on them by new ownership. (Caesars Entertainment is a hybrid of all three.)

To address your concerns as regards specific casinos, it's too soon to comment on Resorts World Las Vegas, other than to observe its astonishing number of amenity tenants and its varying range of price niches. Yes, Virgin has a lot of chefs in the kitchen, probably because Virgin itself has provided little more than the name. The casino is farmed out to one operator, the hotel to another, and the showroom to a third. It remains to be seen how this three-headed creature fares in contemporary Las Vegas, even with business returning at a blistering pace. (We have observed that Virgin, so far, is under-visited.)

Some of the “Less Vegas” mentality you’ve observed is a result of private-equity funds buying casinos, then gutting them for quick profits Caesars, again for example, went from 87,000 employees to 65,000 when it emerged from bankruptcy and there's already much grumbling from customers about the new regime from Eldorado Resorts. 

But such dire events are hardly the sole province of private equity. Racking up debt in pursuit of growth is nothing new to Vegas. The Tropicana became one of the seediest grind joints in town, the hangout of prostitutes, when hotelier Columbia Sussex went heavily into hock to buy a Strip property. Station Casinos sacked the entire workforces of the Santa Fe Casino and Fiesta (now Santa Fe Station and Fiesta Rancho respectively) when it bought them — from different owners — in 2001. If you’re a locals player who likes to know employees by name, that’s hardly a welcome turn of events. And as the pandemic lifts, that locals-friendly amenity, the buffet, is going to be a bygone at Boyd Gaming- and Station-owned casinos, because they’ll make more money that way and the players are expected to spend more time gambling instead.

Workers at The Venetian and Palazzo have to be apprehensive about the impending Apollo/Vici takeover. Sheldon Adelson, to his great credit, sheltered them from the economic effects of COVID, keeping them all on the job. When Apollo takes the reins and has to show (or justify) speedy dividends — private equity ownerships not being in it for the long haul, generally — jobs will be the first items on the chopping-block agenda. Most of the anticipated frugalities will probably be hidden in the back of the house. For instance, the food in Caesars casinos’ employee dining rooms got so bad under Apollo/TPG that the Culinary Union filed a grievance.

However, Las Vegas is a customers’ paradise compared to Atlantic City. Despite Caesars’ promise to reinvest $400 million in its casinos there, they are notorious for their lack of upkeep (ditto certain regional Caesars properties). On the Boardwalk, years of declining revenue, as competition blossomed nearby, have led to a “don’t-do-anything” mentality. There are exceptions, such as MGM-owned Borgata and owner/operator Hard Rock Atlantic City. But the third casino that’s continually upgrading is private equity-owned Ocean Casino Resort. So you see how difficult generalizations are?

The bottom line is that you're probably best advised to spend your money with owned-and-operated casinos such as those of Wynn Resorts, Boyd, Hard Rock International, Station, and Resorts World. As for Venetian/Palazzo, we hope we don’t look back on its Adelson years and say “You should have seen it in those days.”

 

No part of this answer may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, without the written permission of the publisher.

Have a question that hasn't been answered? Email us with your suggestion.

Missed a Question of the Day?
OR
Have a Question?
Tomorrow's Question
Has Clark County ever considered legalizing prostitution?

Comments

Log In to rate or comment.
  • David Liming Jul-30-2021
    Bottom Line
    To me, the bottom line effect on all of us longtime gamblers is terrible. Because now most of the retail shops, restaurant's and entertainment are now owned and run by companies other than the gambling casino, the costs of all are so high and out of site. These other things used to be so great that we didn't mind the gambling losses. Now there is no offset to the gambling losses except for being able to pay off some (not all) purchases there by using reward credits.  The biggest problem the last few years is that more and more retailers and restaurants in a casino no longer take the casino reward credits because they are owned by others and at all Caesar's casino's more and more that do take them require you to pay 2X the amount if you pay by credits. This has moved gamblers away from LV main casino's and is why they now say those casino's only make 30% of their money from gamblers.   

  • Kevin Lewis Jul-30-2021
    No matter how you frame it...
    Vegas casinos, with a few small exceptions, are ridiculous ripoffs. What's gotten even worse recently is that the casinos' formerly good customer service has tanked---and of course, that's just another form of ripping off the customer. Pay a $45 resort fee for...what, exactly?
    
    Only a fool who has no price consciousness whatsoever would come to Vegas now. Fortunately for the casinos, right now, there are millions of eager gamblers who precisely meet that description. But that won't last. The previous generation of casino operators knew the folly of slaughtering the sheep instead of just shearing them. This bunch thinks only in the short term.

  • Luis Jul-30-2021
    More of the same
    Covid has provided another good pretext to take it to the customer in order to maximize their profits. Less and Less value for your dollar, more and more gauging. Every Resort has taken their own measures to do that, some more than others have shown their cards. It's a shame vegas is a shell of itself in customer service, and value. Even with "special" pricing, once you add up resort fees ( taxes are not added up), prices are way Higher, and they do not reflect the service you're getting, not for a long shot. Let's see how long they can keep up that practice, but as for me, I'm content just remembering the good old days (not that long ago), when you could get a great room, great customer service, eat at a a cheap buffet and have fun, great fun in the same place, for now, it's just more of the same, greed, greed and more greed, and thet's what's keeping me from going there again, that and bad covid management.  

  • Rick Sanchez Jul-30-2021
    Retail Only
    We need more CVS and Walgreens on the strip. Now that we have a Target and Ross we might as well have a huge Wal-Mart with a Sams Club.
    Maybe Wal-Mart could get a gaming license and start their owned themed casino, it would fail though as their clientele are more Downtown Vegas people.
    
    Corporate Vegas Sucks!

  • AL Jul-30-2021
    I agree, except the last paragraph
    The Answer given for today's QoD was all good and fine until the final paragraph began "The bottom line is that you're probably best advised to spend your money with owned-and-operated casinos such as those of Wynn Resorts, Boyd, Hard Rock International, Station, and Resorts World." If you want good value and personal service, you should stay away from expensive or glitzy places like Wynn/Encore and Resorts World, and the other choices listed aren't the best either. You will get your best value and best treatment at the relatively small downtown hotel/casinos (except the new Circa). They usually have good room rates and a couple of reasonably-priced good eateries, and the lowest coin-in-required for getting free rooms. They often have deals or promos that are geared toward the moderate roller instead of being reserved for the high roller. And you don't have to walk far for anything, because the entire property (including parking) usually takes up exactly 1 block. You can't beat 'em.

  • Doc H Jul-30-2021
    bottom line reality.....
    Such details don't matter I would say. As long as the casino's are bringing in enough people with what they put out there and can make money regardless if it's from gaming revenue, food, rooms, however they do it, they'll keep doing what they are doing and charging such prices if demand is there. And apparently the demand is there as the city has found a way to pivot away from gaming revenue to other forms of revenue, for better or worse. Aside from the covid dip, people still flock here, it's unique to many, and it is what it is regardless of the complaints. The only thing a business will listen to is rising or falling revenue and profits. The rest is noise.  

  • tikithecat Aug-02-2021
    Another recommendation
    As a local, I would recommend South Point over Boyd or Stations properties. I used to frequently patronize Boyd and Stations, but I would not recommend them now for several reasons, including the severe devaluation of their players club points. Before covid, Stations' and Boyd's points were worth 0.1 percentf, but all players could get 3X points every day at Stations and Emerald and  above players at Boyd got 3X points as well. Now both have cut the value of base points to 0.5 and eliminated the daily multipliers. In addition, at Boyd properties you don't earn any points for comps or free play until you have reached a threshold of tier points. M Resort is also changing to that kind of system. South Point's points base points are still worth 0.3 percent and their buffet is open (expect very long lines). VP games are generally better than Stations' or Boyd's, and blackjacks pay 3-2. It's not perfect, but a good alternative to corporate-run casinos.