Logout

Question of the Day - 19 May 2022

Q:

One of my first trips to Las Vegas — this is going back to the mid-'90s — was to the Hard Rock when it was still relatively new. They seemed to be setting themselves up to be the anchor property on Harmon when the Strip inevitably started to migrate in that direction. That made sense at the time, Harmon seems like such a natural expansion, but it really hasn't materialized. What is the LVA/QoD opinion on why the Strip has never migrated from the current center? Why hasn't there been a significant expansion down streets like Harmon or Flamingo (we'll leave Tropicana out of this because of the airport)?

A:

Ah, the “Harmon Strip” — a developer’s chimera that has lingered for almost 30 years now.

For most of that time, it was conventional wisdom, amplified by the business pages of the Las Vegas Review-Journal, that eastward expansion of gambling and hotels was literally just around the corner. Wishful thinking would be more like it. Why? We can think of at least four reasons.

First, location, location, location. Most Las Vegas visitors like to be on the Strip and aren’t inclined to venture much either to the east or west, unless it’s to the Palms (the exception that proves the rule). Even casinos that are relatively close to the Strip, but not right on it, like the now-casino-less Westin Casuarina and the defunct Lucky Dragon, struggled mightily to draw players. The north-south inclination of the Vegas visitor and this habitual traffic pattern have proven impossible, so far, to break.

Second, lack of demand. Contrary to popular belief, the Strip is not fully built up. Recently, Tilman Fertitta was reported to be close to a deal for six acres of land, including Strip frontage and low-rise real estate, on the corner of the Strip and Harmon Avenue. Prior to that, the Siegel Group snapped up 10 acres across from Resorts World. A parcel south of Fertitta’s is even bigger that has gone begging and as we saw in a recent QoD, the site of the old El Rancho Vegas has remained mostly vacant for decades.  Also, two huge parcels — the Tropicana and the former Plaza/Alon site across from Wynncore — are in play for a major-league baseball stadium.

So there’s really not much of a need to build off the Strip right now and probably won't be for years to come.

Third, Think of the hotel projects along that corridor that have come and (mostly) gone. Two of them — W and Las Ramblas — were announced for Harmon Avenue, but didn’t get much further than some renderings. 

Fourth, it’s a long walk. Even in fair weather, it’s a hike to get from Virgin (the erstwhile Hard Rock) to the Strip. And in doing it, one gets a keen appreciation for how deep those Strip-fronted resorts reach. You really can’t start building anything until you get past Koval Lane and maybe, unless the Las Vegas Monorail is demolished, even farther.

All in all, it’s simply more convenient to graze up and down the Strip and until that changes, we don’t see anything of significance being built out to the east. Heck, only locals casinos like Tuscany Suites and Silver Sevens flourish on Flamingo Road, and tourist-targeted Virgin, on Harmon, is reliably reported to be having problems.

Almost anything is possible in Las Vegas, but that “almost” doesn’t include reinventing the Strip on an east-west axis.

 

No part of this answer may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, without the written permission of the publisher.

Have a question that hasn't been answered? Email us with your suggestion.

Missed a Question of the Day?
OR
Have a Question?
Tomorrow's Question
Has Clark County ever considered legalizing prostitution?

Comments

Log In to rate or comment.
  • Dave_Miller_DJTB May-19-2022
    Tropicana?
    Why do people keep talking about the Tropicana lot for a baseball stadium?
    
    There's a perfectly good lot about 1/2 mile south of Tropicana, and about the same size, with nothing but the Diamond Inn Motel in the middle. Close enough to walk to from the MGM monorail if that's any consideration. (OK, that's a bit of a hike, but still...)
    
    Surely the Tropicana is more valuable than the Diamond Inn, right?

  • VegasVic May-19-2022
    Flamingo Road
    There was always talk of expanding the "strip" west on Flamingo.  There was Bourbon Street Hotel & Casino and the Maxim Hotel and Casino. A little further down was La Mirage (sold the name to Wynn and became Key Largo) and the Continental (now Silver Sevens).  But Maxim became the Westin (no casino) and Bourbon Street and Key Largo closed.  As the QOD says there was, and is, still room in the strip to build and little reason to go east or west.  

  • VegasVic May-19-2022
    Oops
    I meant East on Flamingo

  • rokgpsman May-19-2022
    Uncertain future for expansion
    Las Vegas gets over 90% of its water from Lake Mead. If the water level keeps dropping like it has been doing for the past several years we can expect some serious restrictions on new resort development. Large hotels with thousands of rooms allowing people to use an unlimited amount of water is a luxury that might have to change in some way. Don't be surprised if they add a new Water Usage fee on the hotel bill. Something like that happened years ago with a special Energy/Electric Surcharge, but thankfully it didn't last long.

  • Gregory May-19-2022
    Strat
    I remember an interview where Bob Stupak declared that he with his new Stratosphere Hotel he was extending the strip a quarter of a mile north.  Even today it's debatable, but most would say "The Strip" runs from Sahara Ave, south to Russell Rd. along Las Vegas Blvd..