Logout

Question of the Day - 26 February 2026

Q:

In a YouTube "Beer Friday" episode, Anthony said something to the effect of, "For the non-card counter playing basic strategy, a continuous shuffler is the best way to play blackjack." He then talked about something called the "cut effect" or a similar name. As long as I can remember, all I ever heard from the "experts" is to stay away from continuous shufflers. The "best" game out there is single-deck BJ. Then when that went away, it was double-deck. Can you elaborate why playing blackjack with a continuous shuffler is better than single- or double-deck? I play blackjack and I use basic strategy. What's the best game for me to play?

A:

This is a nuance that often surprises people, because the conventional wisdom has long been to avoid continuous shuffling machines (CSMs). However, that advice is primarily aimed at card counters and those who employ other advantage-play techniques at blackjack.

For a pure basic strategy player, playing a continuous shuffling machine actually has a slightly lower house edge than playing the same game with a cut card. This is due to what Anthony referred to as the "cut-card effect," by which the use of a cut card results in a reduction in the number of hands dealt at positive counts (it takes more cards to complete a hand when the count is rising because small cards are coming out). The non-counter doesn't realize this, but is affected nonetheless.

According to the Wizard of Odds, the reduction in the house edge from a CSM (vs. a cut-card shoe) is about 0.014%, or roughly 0.01%–0.02% depending on exact rules and decks. That's tiny — about 14 cents per $1,000 wagered — but it's still a slight win for the basic strategy player in terms of expected value per hand.

While it doesn't make a big difference, a basic strategy player is slightly better off playing against a CSM than a traditional shoe with a cut card. The practical takeaway is there's no reason for a basic strategy player to avoid a CSM if he would have played the game had it been dealt from a shoe.

Or is there?

Given a pre-pub look at our answer, Blackjack Hall of Famer and author of Blackjack Attack, Don Schlesinger, commented:

"Yes there is [a reason to avoid a CSM], and it’s crucial! With no downtime for shuffling, the CSM plays about 20% faster than the traditional game. So, for many players, who often devote a fixed amount of time to play, like an hour, the CSM will surely be worse. If you choose to play it, then you either purposely play more slowly or quit after 50 minutes, instead of 60."

It's a valid point. For basic strategy players who are playing with negative expectation, losing less really comes down to playing at tables with the most players. More players means fewer hands per hour. Fewer hands per hour means less losses over time. Order a drink. Talk it up. Play slowly. Lose less.

 
No part of this answer may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, without the written permission of the publisher.

Have a question that hasn't been answered? Email us with your suggestion.

Missed a Question of the Day?
OR
Have a Question?
Tomorrow's Question
What's happening with the Downtown Grand?

Comments

Log In to rate or comment.
  • Jeremy Gray Feb-26-2026
    Don’t peek at the man behind the cut card…
    I think you mean the Wizard of Odds, although I’m sure a modern day Emerald City would have a casino that looks like 90s MGM Grand…

  • Anthony Curtis Feb-26-2026
    Oz
    Good one. We typoed "Oz." I like the nod to '90s MGM, back when that group had some imagination.

  • Doug Miller Feb-26-2026
    Schlesinger’s point is valid
    I rarely play blackjack at the tables, but when I do it’s partly because of the possibility of receiving a comp or some type of offer in the future.  Let’s say I have $500 to play at a $25 table and I have two choices, everything else being the same:  Table 1 is full and does not have a continuous shuffler machine, Table 2 has fewer players and has a continuous shuffler machine.  I might be able to play for two hours on Table 1 but perhaps just one hour on the second table.  Unless the casino has some way of accounting for the different number of hands per hour between the two tables I might be able to get better comps or offers by playing at Table 1.  BTW I’m not a card counter.

  • Dave Feb-26-2026
    HOT DECK
    If I get on a run, the last thing I want is for the shoe to run out. I have had tremendous luck with continuous shufflers and 6-deck alike. Usually the people who lose a lot are the ones giving bad advice (dont hit your 12 against a dealer 2, etc).

  • AZmaddog Feb-26-2026
    An old LVA coupon
    Years ago, the LVA had a coupon for 1 hour of blackjack, with blackjacks paying 2-1, at the Golden Gate.  Since about half of the tables were CSM's at the time, playing at the CSM table was a good choice. Because of the 2-1 BJ payouts, every hand had a positive expectation. You never had to worry about "negative counts" cutting into your hour of play.  The CSM table provided you with a faster game with more hands dealt during the hour.  This was a great coupon.

  • Anthony Curtis Feb-26-2026
    Silver Sevens
    This year's Member Rewards has a coupon for a 3-1 payout on your first natural up to a $15 bet. And you can use it once-per-month. The value is several times the membership fee. Silver Sevens is all CSMs.