Logout

Question of the Day - 30 June 2021

Q:

I'm curious to know how much water is left in Lake Mead before nothing can spill over the spillways. Or put dramatically, when does Vegas run on empty?

A:

The Hoover Dam spillways only come into play when the lake is completely full and excess water needs to be released into the Colorado River, which last happened in 1983. Based on recent history, it will be a cold (and wet) day in you know where when that happens again.

What you seem to be asking about, however, are the penstocks. These are the 30-foot pipes that regulate normal river flow and power Hoover Dam’s hydroelectric plant. Those would become unusable if the surface level of Lake Mead ever dropped as low as 895 feet above sea level, at which point the largest reservoir in North America would become a dead pool.

Even then, however, Las Vegas would still be able to slake its thirst from the so-called “third straw,” a giant intake pipe that goes into the lake at the 875-foot level.

This doesn't mean that Vegas is in the clear when it comes to water-use restrictions. As of this writing (mid-June), Lake Mead is at 1,070 feet of water or about 35 percent full. If the reservoir doesn't rise above 1,075 feet by August, a determination will be made by the federal Bureau of Reclamation whereby southern Nevada’s current allocation of water (300,000 acre feet per year) is cut by 13,000 feet. Since Las Vegas gets by on 250,000 acre feet per year, the margin for error is definitely shrinking. 

Says Southern Nevada Water Authority spokesman Bronson Mack, “This is why conservation is so important.”

Even more severe cuts could be on their way if Lake Mead doesn’t meet “Tier 2” levels (1,030 feet) by 2023. “We need three to four consecutive years of above-average inflow, snowpack runoff and inflow into Lake Powell, to refill these reservoirs,” says one federal official. Or as John Wesley Powell prophesied in 1893, “I tell you, gentlemen, you are piling up a heritage of conflict and litigation over water rights, for there is not sufficient water to supply these lands.”

Lake Mead has not been this low since 1935, when then-Boulder Dam was brand new. Twenty-plus years of sustained drought have taken their toll, lowering Lake Mead’s surface by 140 feet. The reservoir is heavily affected by what happens upstream in Lake Powell, whose inflow is estimated to be just 26 percent of its long-term average. Nor is the Rocky Mountain snowpack much help: The Bureau of Reclamation’s Mike Bernardo told the Arizona Republic that the ground is so water-starved that “when the snowmelt starts to run off, it just gets sucked up into the ground like a sponge.”

It’s not just Nevada. Arizona and California are facing cutbacks in their water draw, and Mexico has already made some. A Hoover Dam that once threw off 2,074 megawatts of electrical power now generates only 1,567 megawatts (enough for a quarter of a million homes). That number goes to zero if Lake Mead hits the dead-pool level and Hoover Dam’s turbines cease to spin for lack of water. Warns Bernardo, “The way the reservoir is shaped, we call it a teacup, but it's more like a martini glass. And the lower the elevation goes, the faster the rate of decline.”

This has inspired some alarm, such as in the book Cadillac Desert, whose author Marc Reisner wrote in 1986 that Colorado River-dependent Southwesterners “will probably find themselves facing chronic shortages, if not some kind of catastrophe.”

More circumspectly, Eric Kuhn and John Fleck trace the problem back over a century. True, they write, climate change has played a role. But the present crises “are the inevitable result of critical decisions made by water managers and politicians who ignored the science” back in 1920s, penciling in allocations of Colorado River water so generous it would put the tributary into a deficit. 

This “set in motion decades of decisions that would end in the overuse seen today.” The two authors are not completely pessimistic, however, adding, “The river’s future is not all dark. Innovation, cooperation, and an expanded reliance on science are now the foundation for basin-wide solutions.”

Those solutions appear to be in process, although a fair amount of sacrifice is all but inevitable along the stream toward optimism.

 

No part of this answer may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, without the written permission of the publisher.

Have a question that hasn't been answered? Email us with your suggestion.

Missed a Question of the Day?
OR
Have a Question?
Tomorrow's Question
Has Clark County ever considered legalizing prostitution?

Comments

Log In to rate or comment.
  • Kenneth Mytinger Jun-30-2021
    Having a bad streak
    We need several winters to provide the annual snowpack in the upper Colorado Basin, that melts in the spring and feeds Lake Powell, which in turn feeds Lake Mead.  Our problem is that we aren't getting consecutive "good" winters, only an occasional one.  Nobody knows when, but eventually we will get a good streak.
    
    Here's a good graph of recent snowpacks:
    http://snowpack.water-data.com/uppercolorado/index.php
    

  • AL Jun-30-2021
    If the worst happens
    If the level in Lake Mead drops so low that Las Vegas citizens have to ration water, will they all say "Dam it!"?

  • Kevin Lewis Jun-30-2021
    Climate change
    All the scientists say we can expect diminished rainfall in the Colorado basin on a permanent basis. They say that's because of climate change. However, we all know that's a liberal Deep State fake news hoax. Don't worry, everybody, when President Trump is reinstated (soon!), he'll make it rain again. He's promised!
    
    (What's really appalling is how many people actually believe this.)

  • steve crouse Jun-30-2021
    People???
    No mention in the article of a population that has exploded from a little over 8000 in 1935 to 2.77 MILLION in 2021.
    No wonder so many are rejecting this climate alarmism that's being driven down peoples throat.
    Very few people lived in the desert southwest before 1935 for good reason.
    NO WATER.

  • Kevin Lewis Jun-30-2021
    Uh, Steve...
    The real reason relatively few people lived in the desert Southwest prior to WWII was because there was no air conditioning. 
    
    As far as "no water"--dead wrong. After Hoover Dam was built, there was more than enough water for Nevada and Arizona---in fact, historically, those two states have used only about 1/4 of their Colorado River Compact allocations. When Lake Powell completed filling in 1983, there was so much storage on the lower Colorado that even during a megadrought, there would be enough water to last ten years at current consumption rates. The Colorado may have been overallocated, but the watershed wasn't at all deficient until the Southwest started booming AND droughts became the norm.
    
    Of course, classifying science as "alarmism" is one of the reasons the Southwest is in trouble now. Any fool can tell that the climate is changing. We unfortunately have a political system where those in power are paid handsomely to deny that obvious fact.

  • steve crouse Jun-30-2021
    Comprehension is everything
    I guess you missed the "befoRe 1935" part, Kevin, but lust keep drinking the Kool-aid.

  • Kevin Lewis Jun-30-2021
    Stevie boy...
    Calling acknowledging climate change being "alarmist" is definitely drinking the Kool-Aid.
    
    You implied that the reason there were few people in the desert Southwest prior to 1935 was "no water." I refuted your statement. Guess what---dams don't create water. The Colorado river was always available to be tapped.
    
    But keep drinkin' that Trumpy climate change denier Kool-Aid. With a bleach chaser.