Logout

Question of the Day - 18 August 2025

Q:

In your Question of the Day about how hard (or easy) it is to make a film in Las Vegas, you mentioned, almost in passing, that Leaving Las Vegas was unwelcome at all the casinos in the city. It sounds like an interesting story. Can you go into more detail about that, please? 

A:

For those who haven't seen it, Leaving Las Vegas (1995) is a dark, but touching, romantic drama based on the semi-autobiographical novel of the same name by John O'Brien, who shot himself a couple of weeks after selling the film rights. Family members called the novel O'Brien's "suicide note."

Directed by Mike Figgis, the movie stars Nicolas Cage as an alcoholic who travels to Las Vegas with the express intention of drinking himself to death. But soon after arriving, he hooks up with the heart-of-gold hooker Sera, played by Elizabeth Shue, in whose arms he finally expires. Cage won his sole Academy Award for Best Actor that year for his performance.

The movie itself was made on a shoestring budget of just $3.5 million ($500,000 less than the marketing and promotion budget). So tight was the production money that Figgis himself scored the soundtrack to his film, which he shot on Super 16 instead of 35mm film (that actually adds to the raw quality of the picture).

In a subsequent interview with website filmcritic.com, the director described the realities of working within those financial constraints. "We didn't have any money and we weren't pretending to be something we weren't." There was no way they could afford to shut down the Strip to traffic, as larger productions do, so Figgis had to shoot with all the real-life traffic on Las Vegas Boulevard doing its thing, which, he says, was "brilliant" for the added realism it brought to those scenes.

As for why the movie wasn't embraced by the casinos, they didn't relish being individually associated with a story that focused so heavily on alcoholism, prostitution, and personal destruction, nor did they like the idea of portraying greater Las Vegas in that light. And don't forget, this was in the mid-1990s, when Sin City was actively trying to rebrand itself as more family-friendly. Leaving Las Vegas was exactly what the city didn't need: tarnishing its new image as a fun, carefree, kid-happy destination. 

In addition, as a film with a microscopic budget, it had neither the leverage nor the financial clout of a major studio production to secure filming rights at the big-name casinos. Thus, many scenes were shot “guerrilla-style” without permits or formal permission, especially on the Strip and in certain casinos, and the crew used handheld cameras and filmed quickly to avoid detection. As such, a lot of filming did take place in Las Vegas, including at Excalibur and Bally's and in front of Circus Circus, the Mirage, and the Flamingo.

But the River Palms in Laughlin finally stepped up and provided the location for the interior shots of the casino in the film, including the famous scene where Cage flips over a blackjack table, which was, we've heard, unscripted and unappreciated by the casino. (There was only one take.) A number of other scenes were also filmed in Laughlin, which obviously wasn't worried about any lasting images, given the name and presumed location of the film.

 

No part of this answer may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, without the written permission of the publisher.

Have a question that hasn't been answered? Email us with your suggestion.

Missed a Question of the Day?
OR
Have a Question?
Tomorrow's Question
Has Clark County ever considered legalizing prostitution?

Comments

Log In to rate or comment.
  • sunny78 Aug-18-2025
    interesting
    This line though on so many levels, lmao:
    
    "As for why the movie wasn't embraced by the casinos, they didn't relish being individually associated with a story that focused so heavily on alcoholism, prostitution, and personal destruction, nor did they like the idea of portraying greater Las Vegas in that light."

  • O2bnVegas Aug-18-2025
    What sunny78 said
    Ironically, having read just a bit about the movie prior to release I decided, for similar reasons, I didn't need to see it.  I was actually 'against' the family-friendly theming of Vegas, but reading about the darkenss of "Leaving..." I have passed on it to this day.
    
    Now after reading this I've GOTTA see it!  
    
    QoD has something new for me every day, and this was a super question and the great write up about it.  Thanks again, deke and LVA.

  • black jack Aug-18-2025
    Who needs happy endings, anyway?
    Cage won the Oscar, but Elizabeth Shue was great also. Gotta appreciate the raw camera work, which only added to the dark and gritty feeling of this movie…

  • PaulaNH Aug-18-2025
    Leaving Las Vegas
    Probably one of the best movies about LV I’ve ever seen even as dark as it was. Nick Cage deserved the Oscar and one can read into the dark underbelly of being drawn to the city. Bravo, QOD! Great choice

  • JohnfromtheEast Aug-18-2025
    Great but depressing
     Not every film needs to be made on a big budget to be recognized as a cinematic treasure.  This is one of them.  Not every film has to be upbeat.  This film is depressing.  I am glad when we went to see it, others chose a different movie. I marveled at the intensity and sincereity.  I do not think others may share my opinion.

  • Marcus Leath Aug-18-2025
    Great film
    He deserved the Oscar.  Elizabeth Shue also probably deserved an Oscar for her part.  Overall it is a great film.  I saw it when it came out and I have watched it again in the last couple of years; it holds up.
    

  • asaidi Aug-18-2025
    I understand "Casino" had the same response
    I've heard that casinos didn't want the Scorsese movie "Casino" to shoot in their casinos for the same reason.  They didn't want to be associated with the movie (about gangsters running casinos) - although the movie - which had a large filming budget - did film in some Las Vegas showrooms and restaurants.

  • Michael Aug-18-2025
    Powerful
    This is one of the best movies I've seen. This is despite the fact that you feel empty and depressed at the end. Sadly, a very realistic portrayal of some powerful demons. A must see in my opinion.

  • Hoppy Aug-18-2025
    O2bn
    I agree