As a follow-up to today's question (on infants in casino), aside from the obvious tie-in with alcohol purchases and comps, is there a reason casinos in America seemingly universally require patrons to be 21? Almost every state I’m aware of allows lottery tickets to be purchased by 18-year-olds, and many card rooms with high stakes poker are 18-plus. Lastly, cruise ships sailing from America are 18-and-up for their casinos, even though they won’t allow anyone under 21 to buy alcohol. Given the number of over-18 but under-21-aged folks I see lined up to get into the night clubs every weekend, it seems like Vegas is missing out on an opportunity to bolster the bottom line a bit, something about as rare as catching Halley’s Comet.
We took your question to someone who has strong and informed opinions on the subject, University of Nevada-Las Vegas International Gaming Institute Distinguished Fellow Alan Feldman.
In his previous career as a casino executive, Feldman was the lead spokesperson for Mirage Resorts, then for MGM Resorts International, before retiring to pursue his interest in helping to curb compulsive gambling.
“In the past 30 years, there’s been quite a bit of research on gambling and youth and lowering the gambling age below 21 would be a very bad idea," Feldman told us, “The brain isn't fully formed [yet]. Even 21 might be a little young. It’s a bit nebulous, but 21 is at least a moment at which brain development is more advanced than in an 18- or 19-year-old. Problem gambling affects youth disproportionately. We see more people under 21 in the higher incidence of harm from gambling than those above 21.
“There's also a direct connection between research done on people who are in treatment for gambling disorders with their having started at a young age. To be clear, that doesn't mean that everyone who gambles at a young age will be affected by a gambling disorder. However, the majority of those who are affected by it started at a young age.
"I guess you could make an economic argument about money. What exactly are you trying to achieve by going at people who are still very much in the minimum-wage category of their lives? More for the social and psychological reasons, it’s just not a good idea."
Feldman doesn’t accept the premise of your question.
“The fact that there are differences in ages for certain activities doesn’t mean those differences are correct. Had they asked me when lotteries were first coming on, I would have said, ‘Oh no no no. Make it 21.’ There’s no reason for it to be 18. There's a widely held perception that lotteries are harmless. They obviously aren't to a small number of people. The larger issue is whether or not lotteries are setting in motion a larger cycle of gambling that ends up, at some point afterwards, in a very harmful situation.
“The issue that casinos rarely allow people under 21 has nothing to do with casinos. It has everything to do with state laws. The casinos don’t set the age; the state does. I’ve actually heard many casino companies urging that the minimum age be set at 21 rather than under. The casino industry respects this as well. I haven’t done specific research — my knowledge comes from my own kids, one of whom was involved in the management of nightclubs. They don’t really want to have people who are under 21. They just aren’t the kind of customers most of these places are really looking for. Then you get into the problem of someone who is underage mixing with people who are of age and there are just bound to be problems as far as alcohol service.”
We advanced the not-unfamiliar contention that if one is old enough to vote and serve in the military, one ought to be old enough to gamble. Feldman made short work of that.
“In some cases, gambling carries with it the consequences of very damaging side effects. There’s just no reason to encourage that. My preference would be that the age would be raised in any state where it’s 18 for any gambling activity. I’m also of the view that tobacco should be restricted more tightly than it is and tobacco is a known addictive product. Ninety-eight percent of the people who use it properly [still] become addicted.
“Some of these other examples usually don’t hold water and relate to some social need at the time that they were envisioned. The 18-year-old age for the military goes back I don’t know how many decades. It has to do with people who were physically fit and capable of great endurance. One may be a little hard-pressed to argue that someone who’s 18, 19, or 20 isn’t going to fit that bill. That doesn’t automatically give them the right to do anything else.”
Every so often, some Nevada legislator proposes lowering the gambling age to 18, but it hasn’t been tried in a long time.
“I can’t imagine it even would have gotten to a committee,” Feldman opines. “Here in Nevada, the gaming industry would have stood firm against that. They know that’s not a winning issue. The topic that does come up in Nevada is whether or not the state should have a lottery. And when that's raised, it brings with it this issue of (the minimum) age to participate.
“Here again, if the state were to move forward with that, I would seek to testify or give public comment that 18 is not the right age. Lotteries may be less harmful than other forms of gaming — maybe. But the fact is that people who get in the most trouble are usually participating in three or four different kinds of gambling activities. So you have to take it as part of the whole and not isolate it unto itself.”
So there you have both sides of the argument, one in the question, the other in the answer. Who would like to weigh in on either side?
|
Jackie
Mar-22-2023
|
|
David
Mar-22-2023
|
|
Jack Gruber
Mar-22-2023
|
|
Edso
Mar-22-2023
|
|
Bryan Carr
Mar-22-2023
|
|
Ray
Mar-22-2023
|
|
O2bnVegas
Mar-22-2023
|
|
[email protected]
Mar-22-2023
|
|
rokgpsman
Mar-22-2023
|
|
Lotel
Mar-22-2023
|
|
jay
Mar-22-2023
|
|
Dave_Miller_DJTB
Mar-22-2023
|
|
Ronald Kaim
Mar-22-2023
|
|
Kevin Lewis
Mar-22-2023
|
|
That Don Guy
Mar-22-2023
|
|
[email protected]
Mar-22-2023
|
|
Doozey
Mar-23-2023
|