One time, I was playing a slot machine and a man told me that the machine I was playing would pay off very well, but you had to play the maximum bet before it would pay off. So I played the maximum bet and sure enough, it paid off ... he was right. It continued to hit and I won $80 before leaving. (I'm not a big gambler.) It seemed like it returned money more often because I was playing the maximum bet. I usually only play the minimum bet. Is there any truth to the assumption that playing the maximum bet will win more often or was I just lucky that day on that machine.
The answers to your questions are no and yes.
No, the machine didn't pay off more often because you were making the maximum wagers.
And yes, you were "lucky" that day.
The max-bet belief stems from the many gambling machines, especially progressives, at which you have to bet the maximum amount allowable to hit the highest jackpot.
But a belief that betting the max will somehow alter the return percentage in the player's favor is no less superstitious than whether you stand or sit while playing, carry horseshoes, rabbits feet, family photos, or mini statues of the eight-handed Brahma, or project your superhuman powers of concentration onto the random number generator.
The payback percentage is set by the slot manufacturer and your results from one session to the next are variance, pure and simple.
|
Jackie
Jul-22-2019
|
|
Pat Higgins
Jul-22-2019
|
|
Kevin Lewis
Jul-22-2019
|
|
Jeff
Jul-22-2019
|
|
Kevin Lewis
Jul-22-2019
|
|
Jeff
Jul-22-2019
|
|
Jeff
Jul-22-2019
|