Like all good Vegas junkies, I have read many stories from the good old days when the mob ran things, etc. Many tell about how a criminal would arrive on Friday with a million in $5 and $10 bills; deposit it in the cage; gamble and take in fine dining and entertainment; and leave Sunday evening with $800K in hundreds. In other words: money laundering. My question is, since "the Good Old Days" were subsidized by criminal activity in our own home towns, do we really wish we could go back? Is it possible more sophisticated and effective law enforcement is worth the tradeout?
You make a very good point about criminal activity around the country supporting Las Vegas in the "good old days."
The people who are nostalgic for the days when the likes of Meyer Lansky and Lefty Rosenthal ran the show either weren’t around then or have very selective memories. It was a volatile and violent time, as documented in books like Cullotta, The Battle for Las Vegas, and Nicholas Pileggi’s Casino. Attempts at casino regulation were met with such things as bombs placed in Nevada Gaming Commissioners Harry Reid’s and George Swarts’ automobiles, not to mention the one that Rosenthal survived thanks only to a steel plate under the driver's seat of his Cadillac.
Burglaries, robberies, and murders were committed with impunity by the likes of Tony Spilotro. There's a story in Cullotta in which Strip valet parkers "rented" the cars of locals out for the evening to the hoods, who drove them to the locals' houses and robbed them blind, driving back in time for the cars to be returned to the victims.
Police officers had their homes shot at. Casino investors were blatantly shortchanged as mobsters indulged in all manner of skimming, including short weighing coin by as much as two-thirds, in addition to stock swindles and, in the case of Tamara Rand, murder (unsolved, but Tony Spilotro is long believed to have done the work). Advantage players met with rough justice at the hands of casino enforcers.
The Mob era in Las Vegas was also synonymous with segregation, with the town’s only integrated casino, the Moulin Rouge, being forced out of business under suspicious circumstances. Black entertainers had to enter the hotels through the service entrance and were tolerated at best, but only during, and for brief times before and after, their performances. Then they received the bum's rush out the back doors and they had to stay in Westside rooming houses.
Today, a Las Vegas casino floor is a rainbow coalition of customers from around the world. Initiatives to increase diversity, such as that at MGM Resorts International, would have been unthinkable in the “good old days.” One could say similar things about the #MeToo movement, which sent a dose of salts through what was left of the good-old-boy network on the Strip.
All that said, we might quibble a little with a couple of your assumptions.
First, the sums you quote seem exorbitantly high to us. Even big-time criminals from the major Mob cities of New York, Chicago, Kansas City, and Hot Springs weren't showing up with a million dollars in fives and tens in the 1950s and '60s. The max bet at the table games in those days was $250 in the toniest Strip casinos; $1 million would be 4,000 max bets — unheard of even today. Baccarat, which didn't arrive until the late 1950s, had a $2,000 max — 500 max bets to the million.
In addition, "money laundering," at least the kind you're referring to, is more of a modern-day phenomenon. In today’s paranoid financial environment where cash is often assumed to come from illegal sources and, thus, is routinely confiscated by authorities, transactions as simple as changing up small bills into hundreds, or changing down hundreds into small bills, can be considered money laundering. But in those days, there were no cash-reporting requirements, so money didn't have to be laundered to avoid them (known as structuring or smurfing), nor were there complex business networks of shell companies and trusts based in tax havens (to promote false accounting and tax evasion), both more common forms of contemporary money laundering.
Besides, as noted, organized crime was much more focused on moving a lot of cash out of Las Vegas than bringing it in.
Nowadays, it's easier to “follow the money,” thanks to the involvement of Wall Street. Most casinos are publicly held and “maximizing shareholder value” is holy writ. This has not been without its downsides and those are, beyond a shadow of a doubt, on a different order of magnitude than skimming cash and coin from the count rooms.
For the most part, we believe that Sin City is in good hands, even if they’re not always ideally clean. It's a good thing there’s plenty of hand sanitizer — and accountability — to go around.
But what do you believe? Was Las Vegas better off when "the boys" were in charge? That's the topic of next week's poll, previewed in tomorrow's QoD.
|
Kevin Lewis
Jun-16-2020
|
|
Michael
Jun-16-2020
|
|
Dave
Jun-16-2020
|
|
David
Jun-16-2020
|
|
Ray
Jun-16-2020
|
|
Dave
Jun-16-2020
|
|
kennethross
Jun-16-2020
|
|
Gene Brown
Jun-16-2020
|
|
Alan Canellis
Jun-16-2020
|
|
jay
Jun-16-2020
|
|
Kevin Lewis
Jun-16-2020
|
|
rokgpsman
Jun-16-2020
|
|
Mike
Jun-16-2020
|
|
IdahoPat
Jun-16-2020
|
|
IdahoPat
Jun-16-2020
|
|
VegasROX
Jun-16-2020
|
|
Ray
Jun-16-2020
|
|
Alan Canellis
Jun-17-2020
|
|
IdahoPat
Jun-17-2020
|