I just got back from a trip to Northern Nevada where I spent a couple days in Carson City. I don't understand it. Carson City is a fraction of the size of Las Vegas, but is still the state capital. State capitals are moved all the time, so why hasn't Nevada moved the capital to where all the people, money, and action are?
Several reasons.
For one, Carson City has been the capital of Nevada since Day One and all of the political, administrative, and legal power was concentrated within its confines long before southern Nevada was even part of the state.
In addition, we're not convinced that political power should be centered in the same place that all the people and money are. In fact, it might be the exact opposite (but that's beyond the scope of this answer).
Finally, in all of our study of Nevada history, we can't recall ever coming across any inclination, to say nothing of a grass-roots movement, by Las Vegans wanting their city to become the capital of Nevada.
Nor should it, in our opinion. It's good that southern Nevadans with state business have to tear themselves away from the magnetic field that's Las Vegas to see how the northern part of the state lives.Ā
Ā
|
doufous
Mar-13-2022
|
|
Ray
Mar-13-2022
|
|
VegasROX
Mar-13-2022
|
|
VegasROX
Mar-13-2022
|
|
[email protected]
Mar-13-2022
|
|
Bumbug
Mar-13-2022
|
|
Jeffrey Small
Mar-13-2022
|
|
Thomas Dikens
Mar-13-2022
|
|
Jon Anderson
Mar-13-2022
|
|
thebeachbum
Mar-13-2022
|
|
Llew
Mar-13-2022
|
|
Jackie
Mar-13-2022
|