It was I guess you might say ... curious to me when I saw the tempest in a teapot over the QoD writer's misuse of "affect" and "effect" in the one about fireworks on New Year's Eve. Some commenters maintained that bad grammar, typos, misused words, and the like are a "chronic problem" with the Question of the Day and there's no excuse for it. Others defended the QOtD, claiming that the occasional error is trivial compared to the good information that usually shows up in the answers. As usual, LVA didn't respond. My question is, what is LVA's response to the criticism?
The median word count of our QoD answers is typically 300-350 and that's every day of the year, adding up to 120,000 or so words annually. It seems to us that the laws of probability would dictate that we'll get some wrong. And we readily admit that we do.
However, as for our content suffering from chronic blunders, frankly, we find that to be greatly overstated. If that were accurate, the type of faultfinding that appeared in the comments about the New Year's Eve fireworks QoD would be much more frequent and emphatic.
Truth be told, the corrections are somewhat more recurrent than is generally known; that's because they're behind the scenes. Several literate friends of QoD read our answers when they're posted, looking for everything from mistakes in arithmetic and lapses in logic to historical accuracy and text integrity. And they don't hesitate to contact us, privately, when the inevitable and inadvertent bloopers make it through. Of course, they do it to help us, so we always embrace input and feedback from the eagle eyes out there that pounce on our gaffes. And we always correct mistakes that they point out to us.
Anyone who'd like to participate in the process is welcome to contact us through the Submit a Question link. If we can amend missteps before they become public in the comments, rather than after, subsequent readers don't have to wonder what the critical comments are referring to.
Our response to the criticism also involves the economics of Question of the Day.
If QoD were password-protected, like LVA, and readers had to pay for access, we could afford to have the answers proofread. But QoD is an entirely free feature on this website that, if we do say so ourselves, is completely interactive, always informative, and often entertaining to the extent that any lapse in correct usage can be forgiven -- or if not forgiven entirely, at least overlooked -- for the sake of function over form.
In other words, no one's shelling out their hard-earned spondulicks for QoD, so any sense of entitlement to something more or better than what we can produce under the circumstances is, in our opinion, misguided. If the misuse of "affect" and "effect" compromises the credibility of QoD for you, why read it?
Anyway, perhaps we should conduct a poll about this. The obvious questions would be: Are you fed up enough with our grammatical, orthographical, typographical, mathematical, idiosyncratical, and all the other atical and aphical boo-boos to pay for Question of the Day? Or are you content to get the content for nothing and to live with the incidental indecorous incorrectness? Or should we limit access to QoD to LVA subscribers only, rendering it another benefit of membership and, in the process, a more exclusive club?
Wadda yiz say? Pay or no pay for Question of the Day? Survey or no survey on pay or no pay?
|
David Miller
Jan-19-2023
|
|
Jackie
Jan-19-2023
|
|
Kevin Lewis
Jan-19-2023
|
|
jeaninemb
Jan-19-2023
|
|
Bob
Jan-19-2023
|
|
William Nye
Jan-19-2023
|
|
thebeachbum
Jan-19-2023
|
|
Kevin C
Jan-19-2023
|
|
Vegas Fan
Jan-19-2023
|
|
CHUCK
Jan-19-2023
|
|
Dave_Miller_DJTB
Jan-19-2023
|
|
Jan-19-2023
|
|
Sandra Ritter
Jan-19-2023
|
|
Peter
Jan-19-2023
|
|
Johnny Estrada
Jan-19-2023
|
|
Tal2
Jan-19-2023
|
|
asaidi
Jan-19-2023
|
|
Diamonddog2801
Jan-19-2023
|
|
Deke Castleman
Jan-19-2023
|
|
[email protected]
Jan-19-2023
|
|
[email protected]
Jan-19-2023
|
|
Randall Ward
Jan-19-2023
|
|
Texas Transplant
Jan-19-2023
|
|
The Dr
Jan-19-2023
|
|
bchell
Jan-19-2023
|
|
jeepbeer
Jan-19-2023
|
|
Dorothy Kahhan
Jan-19-2023
|
|
Robert Byrne
Jan-19-2023
|
|
Raymond Jessen
Jan-19-2023
|
|
rokgpsman
Jan-19-2023
|
|
Michael Mendoza
Jan-19-2023
|
|
Jersey Jeff
Jan-19-2023
|
|
bchell
Jan-19-2023
|
|
Dan McGlasson
Jan-19-2023
|
|
Ray
Jan-19-2023
|
|
Keith Crane
Jan-19-2023
|
|
melman
Jan-19-2023
|
|
Mark Nakel
Jan-19-2023
|
|
Raymond Ray
Jan-19-2023
|
|
PK
Jan-19-2023
|
|
145tech
Jan-19-2023
|
|
Jon Anderson
Jan-19-2023
|
|
Howard M
Jan-19-2023
|
|
Andyb
Jan-19-2023
|
|
rodfan
Jan-19-2023
|
|
Debra Grimes
Jan-19-2023
|
|
Dnalorailed
Jan-19-2023
|
|
Robert Rose
Jan-19-2023
|
|
dblund
Jan-19-2023
|
|
[email protected]
Jan-19-2023
|
|
[email protected]
Jan-19-2023
|
|
Bud Ackley
Jan-19-2023
|
|
Roy Furukawa
Jan-19-2023
|
|
Diane Crosby
Jan-23-2023
|