Logout

Question of the Day - 29 April 2026

Q:

Gambler at risk Part 2

A:

[Editor's Note: Yesterday, Andrew Uyal address the guidelines for training casino employees in responsible-gaming issues. Today, we talk about how those guidelines can apply in actual practive.]

Unfortunately, the signs of problem gambling can be sort of convoluted, as it's fairly common for people to joke about not paying their mortgage if they lose this next hand or having to take money out of their kids' college fund. The hard part is sifting through these types of comments that people think are hilarious to find the ones that could actually be a problem.

Usually, the patrons who are really struggling with a gambling problem aren't making jokes like those. They're not even the ones getting super angry, hitting the table, cursing, and complaining about every lost hand. Lots of people hate losing, after all.

Instead, the struggle with problem gambling usually happens internally. The complaining and angst and hopelessness about the money being lost all take place beyond what's obvious, but they do have a recognizable look. It's difficult to explain, but you can see and sense the conflict between knowing they should leave and not being able to stop. Sometimes it's very high-strung and fidgety, while often it's more resigned and defeatist, where you can see they've conceded to the idea that they'll stay in that chair until all their money is gone. 

The difficult part about responsible gaming is that not a lot can be done without the person's admission of a problem. And nine times out of 10, if you come right out and ask them if they're OK or want help or offer the problem-gambling resources, they turn them down and say they're fine, there isn't an issue, they don't need the resources. Then they lighten up and continue to stay until their money is gone anyway.

I've had more success coming at it more subtly, saying something like, "It doesn't seem fun anymore when it's going like this." They almost always agree with me. Then I try to make eye contact, saying their name or make some other kind of personal acknowledgment, and say something like, "These tables aren't going anywhere. Maybe let's try again next time when it can be fun again." This tends to reach those people who know they need to leave. It doesn't, unfortunately, always work like I hope it will, but sometimes it does.

Gaming self-exclusion programs prohibit problem gamblers from gambling at a specific property for fixed terms, like one, two, and five years. Since the player is self-excluding, the program requires the patron to acknowledge and sign. Without that acknowledgement from a patron, all the casino can really do is try to reach them on a personal level, not to put them on an exclusion program, but to get them to realize that they may need one. 

 

No part of this answer may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, without the written permission of the publisher.

Have a question that hasn't been answered? Email us with your suggestion.

Missed a Question of the Day?
OR
Have a Question?
Tomorrow's Question
Is there any latest with the Cal Neva up at north Lake Tahoe?

Comments

Log In to rate or comment.
  • Robbie Apr-29-2026
    Good Q & A
    Good read both days.  Basically, as Andrew Uyal ably pointed out, the first step is admitting that the individual HAS a problem.  That can only come from within.  Not an easy thing to do.
    
    

  • IdahoPat Apr-29-2026
    Acknowledgment from the guest is key ...
    ... and there are places that not too long ago would fire you if you broach the subject with guests, unsolicited. I know, because I've worked for them. Thankfully, the industry is getting away from merely directing guests to literature or a hotline and encouraging employees to be a little more proactive in having these discussions and getting guests to take action in recognizing and dealing with their addiction.

  • Michael B Apr-29-2026
    Stats?
    Are there any stats released that show how many people use the 800 numbers you see to call to get help with problem gambling? Or how many people self exclude?

  • Ben Rosenthal Apr-30-2026
    Self-exclusion programs
    I've heard of casinos essentially using this as a freeroll. Suppose you sign one of these, still come on the property, and lose. Then you're out whatever you've lost, and maybe there are some legal repercussions as well...that I don't know. But what if you've signed one and hit a hand pay on a slot? To my understanding, you won't get paid out. I've even heard of someone hitting a bad beat jackpot in a poker hand and not getting awarded anything because he had self-banned. I know there are plenty of people with gambling problems. I'm not trying to minimize that. If a self-exclusion program truly keeps someone out of the casino who can't help himself, then that's a good thing and the point. But maybe the cynical part of me thinks that some folks in the casino industry love the idea of freerolling a person in this situation.

  • O2bnVegas Apr-30-2026
    a contradiction
    The casino systems, i.e. tiers, Hosts, nurture the susceptible.  Nicer rooms, VIP status, better goodies.  Heck, the acronym itself is seductive.
    
    Candy