Logout

Question of the Day - 01 July 2020

Q:

When was the $1,200 floor on slot winnings enacted? Isn’t it time for a raising of that value?

A:

This is a FFAQ, a fairly frequently asked question. We haven't answered it for a while, so we figure it's time to address it again.

Also, we're not alone. In late May, the American Gaming Association issued a press release commenting on "the Trump administration’s executive order to swiftly identify regulatory reform opportunities to help promote job creation and economic growth." 

The AGA went on to say, "One critical area of regulatory reform the administration should consider is modernizing the $1,200 slot jackpot reporting threshold, which has been in place since 1977. The current threshold is outdated and imposes significant compliance burdens on both the Internal Revenue Service and the gaming industry."

The AGA suggests that the threshold be raised to a "realistic level, in line with inflation, such as $5,000." It cites as benefits less IRS enforcement resources and a significant reduction in "close interactions required between gaming employees and patrons to issue tax forms" in favor of social distancing. 

“This policy change, supported by bipartisan members of Congress, was already long overdue prior to the pandemic, and now has additional importance as the gaming industry emerges from this crisis.”

Actually, we don't know anyone who disagrees -- except, of course, for the IRS itself. Several years ago (2015), the IRS proposed some new regulations about how it wanted to treat casino-machine gambling wins. But instead of raising the amount that would trigger a W-2G from the old '70s amount of $1,200, applying inflation indexing, Revenue proposed to lower that figure to $600.

When these proposed new IRS regulations came out, the gambling world reacted with an uproar. It was a rare occasion when the entire gambling universe, from the giant casino corporations and tribal casinos down to penny slot players united to oppose the plan. And there's been nary a word since then about lowering the threshold. 

But with governments from municipal to federal reeling from the shrinking tax bases caused by the pandemic, we wouldn't be surprised -- the AGA's lobbying notwithstanding -- to see the issue rear its ugly head again. 

 

No part of this answer may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, without the written permission of the publisher.

Have a question that hasn't been answered? Email us with your suggestion.

Missed a Question of the Day?
OR
Have a Question?
Tomorrow's Question
Has Clark County ever considered legalizing prostitution?

Comments

Log In to rate or comment.
  • David Miller Jul-01-2020
    $$$$$$$$
    It is all about the money.

  • rokgpsman Jul-01-2020
    IRS reporting
    If the reporting amount of $1200 is raised to $5000 or some other higher number that would mean the government would be depending on the honesty of people to voluntarily report even more winnings and pay tax on it. They know that wouldn't always get done. Many people don't report the winnings they get now that are less than $1200 and they get away with it, the IRS doesn't have the manpower to run down everything so they concentrate on the big tax offenders. In their view raising the reporting threshold to $5000 would just give people the ability to pay less in taxes due. I'm for paying less tax but I understand the IRS view, as a tax collector they don't see this as a good idea. So it will take Congress action to raise the reporting threshold.

  • Pat Higgins Jul-01-2020
    Big Tex
    I agree that Congress will have to get in the mix.  But I am willing to bet, that if they raise the reporting threshold to a higher amount, I bet the amount reported will not change.  

  • Brent Jul-01-2020
    It's more than antiquated, it's inequitable
    I agree that the threshold should be raised and tied to inflation. 
    
    More importantly, though, gamblers should be allowed to offset all gambling winnings with gambling losses in the same year. With the standard deduction now set much higher, most average players are fully taxed on W-2Gs, even though they almost certainly lost more than they won.
    
    Meanwhile, wealthy high rollers have a much better chance of offsetting wins and paying less tax. Once again, the corrupt Trump administration and Republicans in Congress have cheated the middle class and rewarded their wealthy cronies.

  • [email protected] Jul-01-2020
    WHO CARES
    rokgpsman who cares?? If you want to report every $500 win be my guest.

  • thebeachbum Jul-01-2020
    Let Me Add (off topic)
    Let me add that your win/loss statement from a casino should be good enough to show your gambling winnings or losses.  It provides third party documentation of your win/loss.  Let the IRS go after the casino and pit bosses to make it more accurate for table games.  These little notebook diaries suck the fun out of gambling some days.

  • [email protected] Jul-01-2020
    So what?
    I guess I don't understand the complaints on this one.  You have to report all your gaming income whether you get a W2G or not.  I guess the only possible issue is delays when waiting for the form to be delivered.  I can see this could be an issue for high rollers who hit payoffs of this size a lot (e.g., on a $25 JOB machine every 4 of a kind or better would require a W2G, so I can see that would get boring fast).  But given the general level of cheapness of LVA readers, I suspect that isn't a problem for most of us!

  • Bob Nelson Jul-01-2020
    Taxing winnings
    The IRS is already taxing the vast majority of gambling winnings when they tax the casinos.

  • Sandra Ritter Jul-01-2020
    @Bob Nelson
    How is that?  The winnings given to gamblers would be deducted from the revenue. They're not taxed at the casino level. That's why IRS wants you to report ALL winnings, not just W-2G reported winnings.

  • O2bnVegas Jul-01-2020
    how much?
    Does anyone have a figure, how much total revenue the Fed currently sees yearly from taxed gambling winnings in the US?  
    
    Keeping it simple, not trying to estimate unreported winnings, illegal shenanigans, etc.  
    
    How much was taken in, say, last year?  
    
    And to which "pot" in the Federal budget are those dollars allocated?

  • Kevin Lewis Jul-01-2020
    In the good old days...
    A recent poll asked whether readers preferred the good old Mob days of Vegas or today's corporate dominance. In relating to today's question, I should observe that in the good old days, when you hit a big jackpot, you didn't have to fill out some silly form. They just took you out back and beat you senseless. That was the only tax you paid.

  • David Jul-01-2020
    Gambling winnings should not be taxed
    The government doesn't have a revenue problem - it has a spending problem.

  • VegasROX Jul-01-2020
    lschulz SURELY NOT
    You say "But given the general level of cheapness of LVA readers"..   I really prefer the word THRIFTINESS, my friend :)  Ron, also in NC

  • AyeCarambaPoker Jul-01-2020
    Palavar 
    What an absolute palavar - what is the point of making tens or even hundreds of millions of players (who are mostly losing money anyway) fill out tax forms when you could just tax the biggest winner on their profits? Here in the civilised world it works just fine and takes out so much admin
    
    Isn’t it also a proper PITA for the high stakes slots players who are effectively getting a hand pay & IRS form on virtually any win - where is the fun in that? 
    
    But would the cashiers moan if the limit for handpays was increased as it would see a noticeable decline in their tips?
    
    Land of the free my aaargh I’ve run out of space

  • sarahcuda Jul-01-2020
    employees
    As a player, I would love to raise the limit. As a Slot Attendant, I would like to keep it as is. The casinos possibly would like to keep it that way as well, since they might have to pay Slots employees more to offset the loss of tips. Cage cashiers would love to raise the limit, more tickets to cash because of less hand pays.
    

  • Molly Jul-01-2020
    Trump of all people
    He should be the first to want to raise it to $5000.00, Trump was in the casino business, and he knows 99.99% of us end up losers in the end. I can understand how the rest of politicians have their head up their ass!

  • Bob Nelson Jul-01-2020
    @Sandra Ritter
    Because the vast majority of winning is done by the casinos.

  • Reeko Jul-02-2020
    Trumps Fault?
    Brent...really? This is Trumps fault also?
    LMAO

  • Brent Jul-02-2020
    Yep, Trump's Fault
    Reeko, Absolutely. The Trump tax act (I won't call it a "tax cut," since most people didn't get a cut at all) in 2017, passed by the Republican congress, made is a practical impossibility for most players to deduct losses, but they still must report wins.
    
    So If i bet $1,300 a year and win one $1,200 jackpot, I have "won" $1,200 for tax purposes and must pay taxes on $1,200. But if I bet through $130,000 a year and win 10 $12,000 jackpots, I can offset all my winnings with my losses and pay no taxes on winnings.
    
    So yeah. Trump's and the Republican's fault.

  • [email protected] Jul-02-2020
    Profanity Really
    What rokgpsman you can only express yourself using profanity! Some peoples kids. Also your not man enough to post your reply here in public. WOW I'm offended.

  • IdahoPat Jul-02-2020
    Raise it to $4000.01
    That's one penny over the payoff for a royal flush at $1 denom. The overwhelming majority of jackpots are on video poker for amounts less than these.