Following up on today's question about owned and leased slot machines, you said that casinos usually lease machines that have themes that are more expensive to license. You also said, "Most leased slots have a higher hold percentage than casino-owned slots (again due to the high licensing fees)." I'm assuming that means leased machines have a higher house edge. So, would it be fair to say that a machine based on a popular TV show might have a higher theme licensing cost, thus is more likely to be leased and is more likely to have higher house edge and should be avoided (for anything other than entertainment value)?
Yes, it's our understanding that leased machines have a higher hold/house edge than casino-owned machines, due to higher back-end costs, especially the fees for licensing rights on intellectual properties.
But we should also add that in our way of thinking, all slots should be avoided due to their high house advantage -- for anything other than entertainment value.
|
David Miller
Jan-21-2019
|
|
Dave
Jan-21-2019
|
|
gaattc2001
Jan-21-2019
|
|
Straski
Jan-21-2019
|
|
Vickar
Jan-21-2019
|
|
O2bnVegas
Jan-21-2019
|
|
David Miller
Jan-21-2019
|
|
Kevin Lewis
Jan-21-2019
|
|
David Sabo
Jan-21-2019
|