Logout

Question of the Day - 29 December 2022

Q:

Can you explain the new National Monument that looks like it'll be coming to Southern Nevada?

A:

This is a big story that we’ll just sketch out here due to space and time limitations.

The gist is that Spirit Mountain, known in the Yuman language as Avi Kwa’ Ame, is sacred to the relatively large Fort Mojave Indian Tribe and a dozen other smaller tribes in the “tristate” area centered on the triangular-shaped wedge of far southern Nevada between California and Arizona.

At 5,643 feet, Avi Kwa’ Ame is the highest peak in the Newberry Mountains that sit due north of Laughlin, visible from all over far southern Nevada. It's considered the center of creation for all Yuman-speaking tribes, who live along the lower Colorado River from Arizona to Baja California. These include names familiar to most residents of the area: Maricopa, Mohave, Havasupai, Hualapai, and Yavapai (pai meaning water).

Spirit Mountain was listed on the National Register of Historic Places as a Traditional Cultural Property in September 1999. In 2002, Congress designated the mountain, along with 33,000 acres surrounding it, as a wilderness area. Most of that lies within the Lake Mead National Recreation Area.

Now, the Biden administration has announced its intention to proclaim approximately 450,000 acres, nearly 700 square miles and practically the entire southern wedge of Nevada, off-limits to development, creating Spirit Mountain National Monument under the 1906 Antiquities Act. It would protect the tract between the Mojave National Preserve, 1.6 million acres between I-15 and I-40 on the California side, and Lake Mead Recreation Area, the largest in the nation, prohibiting developers, particularly wind- and solar-power companies, from encroaching on sacred lands and threatening desert tortoises, bighorn sheep, golden eagles, and dozens of other species.

A wide-ranging coalition of tribes, local and national lawmakers, environmentalists, and the local business community supports the measure, though the renewable-energy industry and its advocates claim it could thwart the country’s climate-change goals.

Some of the companies are asking for a small carveout, which they’re calling a “sliver,” that doesn’t impact culturally or environmentally sensitive areas, but gives them access to what they consider some of the best resources for clean-energy development on the continent — the strong winds of the many canyons in the proposed monument, plus flatlands that enjoy 300 days a year of sunshine and no cloud cover, along with numerous mining claims for rare-earth elements, especially valuable for clean-energy technology.

Thus far, the feds have been holding hearings. But it seems likely that the national monument will be created, marking the largest tract of land that will be preserved in this presidential term.  

 

No part of this answer may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, without the written permission of the publisher.

Have a question that hasn't been answered? Email us with your suggestion.

Missed a Question of the Day?
OR
Have a Question?
Tomorrow's Question
Has Clark County ever considered legalizing prostitution?

Comments

Log In to rate or comment.
  • Bob Dec-29-2022
    Oxymoron?
    " mining claims for rare-earth elements, especially valuable for clean-energy technology."   Realt ain't much clean about a Lithium Mining operation!  

  • JimBeam Dec-29-2022
    Caution
    Be careful with this stuff. This is just another example of the government reclaiming a lot of the land in the West/BLM land that actually belongs to the people. Obama did it during his administration too, along big portions of the 95, just north of Vegas. Free land like this is wonderful to have - just ask people on the east coast where BLM land is virtually non-existent. 

  • David Dec-29-2022
    Not sure what Jim Beam means
    Not sure what Jim Beam means about land that “belongs to the people”. BLM land belongs to the people. I live literally up against BLM land and I am grateful that this land will be kept in its natural state in perpetuity.

  • Maggie Dec-29-2022
    David
    Not sure exactly what Jim Beam means but they could mean being able to graze livestock on public land.  BLM has something like 150 million acres of public land where it is possible to obtain a permit to graze livestock.  If the national monument is approved this might mean land that is taken out of the pool available to ranchers.

  • steve crouse Dec-29-2022
    Feds
    Just another federal land grab.

  • Lotel Dec-29-2022
    Great Idea
    Last thing you  need is more corporations destroying that land for some stupid development in that beautiful area. 

  • Doc H Dec-29-2022
    NIMBY
    David, while I'm sure you do indeed appreciate the privacy of no development near your house being up against BLM land, the other side is it's not the taxpayers job to give you a NIMBY existence.