I know it is years away. But with the heavy hitters backing it, casinos and gaming are bound to become legal in Texas. I would bet the casino in Dallas will be spectacular and I would also bet there will be only two zeros on the roulette wheel and blackjack will pay 3 to 2. So will this, in your opinion, have a significant impact on Vegas? Hard to say I know, but could it end the gouge on the Strip? (Will you start a TGA (Texas Gaming Advisor) newsletter?
We believe you're right: Texas appears to us to be years away from gambling, not least due to the slow-moving political machinery in the Lone Star State.
At present, “the Lege,” as political columnist Molly Ivins styled Texas lawmakers, has been resistant to casino legalization. Despite heavy GOP contributions from the Adelsons, both the late Sheldon and his widow Miriam, politicians on the Republican side of the aisle have persistently ignored their casino ambitions. More support can be counted on from Democrats, but neither the state GOP nor Adelson wants to reach out in that direction.
As for the "heavy hitters," Las Vegas Sands and now, thanks to its relationship with Dallas Mavericks' owner and billionaire, Mark Cuban are the only ones in the ballgame at present. Other casino corporations are hanging back and while Texas’ own Tilman Fertitta has lent lip service to the cause, he’s been leading from the rear. No wonder: He’s heavily invested in nearby Lake Charles, Louisiana. Large commitments to Louisiana may also be staying the hands of Caesars Entertainment, Penn Entertainment, and Boyd Gaming, all interested parties.
Where would casinos go in Texas? One prevalent view attempts to achieve consensus by offering to sprinkle five megaresorts across the state. However, safety may be in numbers. Las Vegas, Reno, and Atlantic City succeeded as gaming destinations because they offered clusters of casinos in relatively isolated locations. Dallas is an obvious casino location (with Mark Cuban wanting a new stadium for the Mavs surrounded by an entertainment-casino district) and Houston has historical claims in that department.
What would the impact on Las Vegas be? Probably slight.
Figures for Texas’ contribution to Sin City aren’t available, though we have noted over the years the number of Texas license plates around town. However, it's difficult to accept at face value Sheldon Adelson’s claim that the Lone Star State is a $10-billion-a-year market. That would make it almost as big as Nevada in gambling revenue, in a state with limited casino penetration (two tribal gambling houses at present) and vast distances to cover if you want to have a flutter. Also, if Texas were full of people just itching to gamble, why are we not seeing bigger numbers out of Lake Charles and Shreveport, as well as Oklahoma’s myriad tribal casinos?
Would Las Vegas Strip casinos be forced to end their price-gouging ways for fear of Texan competition? Toe put it bluntly, not bloody likely. The success of tribal casinos in California hasn’t done it, nor has the proliferation of gaming across the country. A handful of resorts in Texas aren’t going to change that.
And we'll take your bet on double-zero roulette and 3-2 blackjack. How about $50,000? Las Vegas Sands, after all, introduced triple-zero at the Venetian. And 6-5 tables are now the norm on the Strip, whence any major casinos in Texas will come.
Finally, would or will we publish a Texas Gaming Advisor? Nah. Las Vegas is enough for us.
|
David
Dec-16-2023
|
|
Thomas Dikens
Dec-16-2023
|
|
Thomas Dikens
Dec-16-2023
|
|
John Hearn
Dec-16-2023
|
|
Kevin Lewis
Dec-16-2023
|
|
Sandra Ritter
Dec-16-2023
|
|
Robert
Dec-16-2023
|
|
lloyd crimm
Dec-16-2023
|