Do the tribally owned casinos have to disclose slot payout percentages? They don't in California.
This question is a bit outside our area of expertise, so we turned to the dean of gaming law, I. Nelson Rose.
He writes, “Tribes are domestic nations, self-governing except to the extent Congress has limited their powers. Congress enacted Public Law 280, which gave some states the power to enforce their criminal, but not civil, laws on Indian lands.
“In Cabazon the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the test for whether a state has enacted criminal as opposed to mere civil control over its own gambling is whether there is a complete prohibition. The high Court also ruled there was no public policy reason to allow any state which legalized a form of gambling to prohibit tribes from operating that gambling; and tribes are self-regulating. Since California allowed charity bingo, tribes could operate bingo, but were not subject to the state’s regulation of a $250 jackpot limit, which was merely civil.
“Congress codified, that is, wrote Cabazon into law, by enacting the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act [in 1988]. That law divided all gambling into three classes. Class I is traditional and social games, like home poker, and is completely under the control of the tribe. Class II is non-banking card games, like card room poker, and bingo, including pull-tabs. Class II is regulated by the tribe, with some minimal oversight by the National Indian Gaming Commission, created by IGRA.
“Pull-tabs were originally used in charity bingo games, which never made their payout schedules public. One of the reasons was the pay-outs are terrible, often 85 percent or less, compared to more than 90 percent for slot machines. When tribes put these games onto electronic machines, calling them video pull-tabs, they kept the rotten payouts and also kept the payout schedules secret.
“Class III is all other forms of gambling, including slot machines. Class III requires a state-tribal compact. States could have required tribes to make their payout schedules public, but I do not know of any that do. From my observations, tribal payout schedules appear to be pretty bad for players, particularly where the tribal casino is the only game in town.”
Adds former California gaming regulator Richard Schuetz, private-sector casinos aren’t much better (and he used to run one, the Stratosphere). “I do not believe that Nevada casinos disclose their payout percentages, other than massively aggregated in the Nevada Gaming Control Board stats. I believe in Pennsylvania they list the payout percentage by the property, but again that is a weak number in that it is different for each denomination (meaning a big high-end market results in a lesser hold percentage for the property). Back in the day in New Jersey, it was required by denomination and property. They used to be published in the papers.”
Needless to say, you could wade through a lot of newsprint without finding the payout percentages for a tribal casino.
|
Donzack
Jan-06-2022
|
|
[email protected]
Jan-06-2022
|
|
Randall Ward
Jan-06-2022
|
|
jay
Jan-06-2022
|
|
jay
Jan-06-2022
|
|
Kevin Rough
Jan-06-2022
|
|
Roy Furukawa
Jan-06-2022
|
|
rokgpsman
Jan-06-2022
|
|
AZmaddog
Jan-06-2022
|