Logout

Question of the Day - 25 November 2025

Q:

I was interested to read your take on Vegas as a family destination and was surprised by 1) how many are taking family vacations there and 2) how many activities and attractions there are for kids that are also of interest to adults. My question, based on that, is this: Can Vegas be considered Sin City anymore? Seems to me the more it grows as a city, the less the "sin" part pertains.

A:

The short answer, to us anyway, is yes. But "Sin City" is a brand now, not an admonition.

In some ways, Las Vegas hasn’t been Sin City for decades, at least not in the way the nickname was originally intended. But in other ways, it’s never fully lost that identity — it’s just been rebranded for a new era. In other words, it’s certainly not the outlaw town it once was, but the spirit of indulgence is still baked into the Vegas DNA — only now, a $50 resort fee and $20 parking fee are attached.

In the 1940s, '50s, and '60s, Sin City referred to wide-open gambling, long before it was legal anywhere else in the country, with lots of drinking, risque entertainment, gangster shoulder rubbing, and, perhaps primarily, ready sex for sale or even comped. In addition, the sense of lawlessness and indulgence gave visitors a kind of dispensation to do what they couldn't, shouldn't, or wouldn't dream of doing at home. 

Of course, the corporate era diversified Las Vegas in order to attract new crowds. That included family-friendly attractions, high-level dining, even cultural (gasp!) events, while the Sin City aspects, such as topless revues, showgirls, shills, and a tolerance for working girls, faded into the mists. True, that transition backfired to a certain extent and by the early 2000s, Vegas was back into hedonism, personified by the slogan “What happens in Vegas stays in Vegas.” Even then, it was corporate-sanctioned hedonism — sanitized, expensive, and heavily surveilled.

Today, you could call Las Vegas the home to "polished vice." There's still plenty of sin, we suppose, but now luxury has replaced affordability: dayclubs, bottle service, upper-end escorting instead of open prostitution. You can indulge, but within highly managed and  powerfully profitable parameters.

We'd add that while Sin City remains associated with Vegas' history of gambling and nightlife, the city is actively rebranding once again, having insinuated a family-friendly insert into its other traditional moniker of the Entertaiment Capital of the World -- and Sports. Other than the occasional cheating scandal and misbehavior of athletes, the sports focus is decidedly beyond the traditional meaning of Sin City. 

In short, Las Vegas wears "Sin City" like a sequined cocktail dress: flashy, unapologetic, and eternally alluring. But most of the "sins" have been adapted and coopted to draw broader crowds. The ones that remain are the province of the well-heeled and celebrity-crazed.

 

No part of this answer may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, without the written permission of the publisher.

Have a question that hasn't been answered? Email us with your suggestion.

Missed a Question of the Day?
OR
Have a Question?
Tomorrow's Question
Where did casino shills work in the '70s and '80s and how much did they earn?

Comments

Log In to rate or comment.
  • Kevin Lewis Nov-25-2025
    Not a real city for decades 
    From 1931 (legalization of gambling in Nevada) to at least the mid-1980s, Las Vegas lacked basic features that any city a tenth its size would have. There were few or no parks, bad and undersized schools, no culture of any kind, not even sidewalks on many major streets, a truly pathetic and inadequate transit system, and most of all, there was a lack of municipal government other than lackeys who served the casinos. Vegas was nothing more than a bunch of casinos surrounded by trailer parks and walled-off mansions. So it became known as Sin City well before it became a city.

  • Sharon Nov-25-2025
    MISS YOU 😢 
    Thanks Kevin!  Always a pleasure to read what you have to offer!  You’ve always been at the top of my list!  Thanks!!

  • Doug Miller Nov-25-2025
    This has been reflected in a couple of movies
      As far back as 1981 (I think) the movie Atlantic City was released, and I believe the character played by Burt Lancaster dismissed the Atlantic City casinos as Disneyland.  In the movie Casino, which is now 30 years old, a similar point was made in narration by Robert Deniro towards the end of the movie about Las Vegas itself.  I don’t have a problem with the “new” Las Vegas, which in my mind goes back at least to the opening of the Excalibur around 1990 and the Mirage in 1989, but I understand the point made by Burt Lancaster’s character in Atlantic City that we have lost something in the process, maybe gambling, topless shows and open drinking had more allure when they were illegal, or at least disapproved of.