Last weekend at a blackjack table at Aria, my wife said "Vegas" without the "Las." Another player at the table piped up to say that saying Vegas without the Las is a way that outsiders try to sound like insiders, but insiders never say say just Vegas, always Las Vegas. Is that true? (By the way, he sounded like a know-it-all, but it still stung my wife.)
We get this question every so often; the last time was six years ago and we fielded some excellent comments about it.
Also, we've heard this contention many many times since we moved here (and that was a long time ago).
It seems to us to be similar to the way it’s drummed into visitors’ heads that it’s hopelessly uncool to call San Francisco "Frisco." (The late San Francisco columnist Herb Caen was the point man on that detail; he published a book, as far back as 1953, titled Don’t Call it Frisco.)
Though we’ve never seen anything official or even unofficial about it, we suspect it’s just a way to separate us (the locals) from them (the out-of-towners), though it doesn't really. We call it Vegas on occasion, both in speaking and in print, as do almost other Las Vegans we know.
Case in point: The most successful marketing campaign this city has even seen was, "What happens in Vegas stays in Vegas." And that was thought up by locals for sure.
For the previous answer, one commenter cited the Vegas Golden Knights as evidence that just Vegas is perfectly acceptable. On the other hand, we also have the Las Vegas Raiders, the Las Vegas Aces, the Las Vegas Lights, the Las Vegas Aviators, and if/when they show up, the Las Vegas A's. So that's certainly not definitive.
Also, our self-described "outside insider" blogger Bobby Vegas tells us, "Hunh. Well. I'm not changing my name to Bobby Las Vegas. Just sayin'."
Several commenters distinguished between Las Vegas as "a metropolitan area with a couple million people" and Vegas as the tourist corridor. "When I rent a car, I consider it a 'Las Vegas' trip. When I take an Uber from the airport and don’t plan to leave the resort area, I consider it a 'Vegas' trip." And this one: "Vegas is more of a state of mind, a place people go to have fun."
Another interesting comment was about the difference between Vegas and Frisco. "Saying Vegas is not parallel to saying Frisco. Not even close. When we say Vegas, we simply omit the Las; nobody simply omits San and refers to San Francisco as Francisco. When anyone says Vegas, everyone knows you're talking about Las Vegas. Bay Area folks are defensive about Frisco, because the word is a bastardization (while "Francisco" would not be). Just saying Vegas does no such thing. I can see how Frisco can seem disrespectful. But Vegas is not disrespectful."
Someone else took the same tack, but from an entirely different angle. "I've been coming here since 1963, have had a weekend condo since 2003, and have lived here permanently since 2013. I cringe when I hear Vegas. Nobody says, Angeles for Los Angeles, or York for New York, or Diego for San Diego. And those cities are as vibrant and tourist-oriented as Las Vegas. So for me, it's something tourists say and is uncool."
But then there was this. "People call things what they're comfortable with. Neither Frisco nor Vegas diminishes either one; they're more terms of affection than ones to demean. Even if I were to say Lost Angels, you'd know I mean Los Angeles. Bottom line, we all know what any of the terms means."
In the end, we like most what one commenter wrote, "Whatever you call it, this is the greatest metropolitan area in the world!"
|
AL
Oct-02-2024
|
|
Donzack
Oct-02-2024
|
|
Bob
Oct-02-2024
|
|
Thomas Dikens
Oct-02-2024
|
|
Randall Ward
Oct-02-2024
|
|
asaidi
Oct-02-2024
|
|
Michael Mendoza
Oct-02-2024
|
|
IPA Noah
Oct-02-2024
|
|
Henry
Oct-02-2024
|
|
PaulaNH
Oct-02-2024
|
|
Sandra Ritter
Oct-02-2024
|
|
Kevin Rough
Oct-02-2024
|
|
Roger Gallizzi
Oct-02-2024
|
|
Hoppy
Oct-02-2024
|