My wife and I love video poker, but take very different approaches to the game. She doesn't accept that hands are randomly dealt independent events. She believes that machines are pre-set to be hot (or not) on any given day and machine-hops trying to find one that has been “set to pay out.” I play for hours on my machine of choice (based mostly on pay schedule) whether or not a particular session is profitable. Recently, playing side by side at a Strip casino, I went on a mini hot streak, hitting several four-of-a-kinds during a brief stretch of Bonus Poker. After I finished play, she stayed and continued at her machine. She says that I was barely out of my seat when a casino employee swooped in, opened my machine, and worked on the inside for a few minutes. She's convinced that the technician was “cooling off” my machine, because it was paying out too much. What is your take?
Unless the slot tech was installing cooling pads, ice packs, or cold bricks, we doubt that he or she was "cooling off" your machine. Frankly, we don't know why the tech opened it up, but it wasn't to "turn a screw" or reprogram the machine on the fly.
We've addressed this question many many times, but it is, admittedly, a difficult concept to grasp and it keeps coming up in different forms. That said, the answer is always the same: Video poker machines must be based on a random deal from a complete 52-card deck, 53 if there’s a joker. The key word here is random, which precludes a video poker machine from doing anything but dealing out unplanned hands every round.
Now, conceivably, VP machines could be programmed with "hot and cold cycles," but that would essentially constitute rigging the game: One player might come in at the beginning of a programmed down cycle and lose his shirt, while another player might come in at the beginning of an up cycle and win the moon.
Yes, this sometimes happens anyway, but since every hand is the result of a random deal, the cycles, too, are random functions of luck -- or what mathematicians refer to as "variance" or "fluctuation."
In the end, a machine gets to its specified rate with play volume, strictly in accordance with its pay schedule.
Let’s take a 9/6 Jacks or Better schedule, the full-pay version of this game, with an expected return of 99.54%. The more hands you play, the closer the machine will get to returning $99.54 for every $100 you put through it -- with perfect play.
Now, compare that to the 8/5 version of Jacks or Better, with an expected return of 97.3%. The more hands you play, the closer the machine will get to returning $97.30 for every $100 put through, assuming perfect play. Then there are the 7/5 and 6/5 versions, with an expected return of 96.15% and 95%, respectively.
This explains one of the attractions of video poker for the player: Simply by reading the pay schedule, which is posted on the face of every machine, you can determine what the return rates will be in the long term against perfect play. You can’t do that for slot machines.
So back to the original question: The machines in Nevada and similarly regulated jurisdictions aren't programmed with streaks. For all intents and purposes, that would be cheating.
|
Kevin Rough
Apr-04-2024
|
|
Dave
Apr-04-2024
|
|
vegasnow
Apr-04-2024
|
|
Gregory
Apr-04-2024
|
|
Kevin Lewis
Apr-04-2024
|
|
Deke Castleman
Apr-04-2024
|
|
Ronald Kaim
Apr-04-2024
|
|
Hoppy
Apr-04-2024
|
|
AL
Apr-05-2024
|