Posted on Leave a comment

The Second Deal, Part I – The Strike Second Deal

by Sam Case
(From Blackjack Forum Vol. I #3, December 1981)
© 1981 Blackjack Forum

The most devastating, and unfortunately, the most common, cheating technique in the single-deck game is the second deal. In essence, the dealer appears to deal the top card, when actually the second card from the top is dealt. The second deal most often is used when the dealer knows the top card (by peeking), and wishes to withhold it to increase his chances of winning.

The deck is held in the mechanic’s grip (Fig. 1). This is the grip used by most dealers (including honest ones) since it exposes no cards and offers great control. There are two types of second deals – “strike” seconds, and “push-off” seconds. The mechanics grip is used for both types. A “perfect” second appears to be dealt in exactly the same manner as the top card would be dealt. If the mechanic is good, no one can tell the difference. But there are tip-offs you can watch for which would indicate the possibility (or impossibility) of being dealt a second.

The Strike Second Deal: The deck is held in the left hand, using the mechanic’s grip. The right thumb appears to be sliding the top card off the deck, while the left hand remains stationary. Actually, the left thumb has drawn the top card slightly back toward the dealer, exposing the front right corner of the second card. (Fig. 2). The right thumb strikes this exposed corner and slides the second card out. Simultaneously, the left thumb slides the top card back to its original position.

If you watch an expert execute this deal, you cannot possibly tell when he is dealing the top card or the second card. Both his speed and the Bee design (standard diamond pattern on most casino cards) prevent you from perceiving any “flash” of the exposed seconds’ corners. You will be unlikely to detect the very slight movement of the left thumb as it draws back the top card, because of the arcing motion of the left hand as it swings around to aim the deck at the player. What you may notice is that the left thumb never leaves the top of the deck.

You will not frequently encounter a strike dealer (honest or dishonest) at any casino blackjack table. Strike dealing is quite vigorous. The right hand rips the card from the deck. There is no reason for an honest professional dealer to work this hard. Most dealers just push off the top card with the left thumb, and then deal it with the right thumb and forefinger. I would suspect and avoid any dealer who uses a strike dealing style. He may be honest, but I wouldn’t chance it. Since strike dealers are uncommon you will not be eliminating many potentially profitable games by avoiding all such dealers.

An excellent example or strike second dealing may be viewed on the Rouge et Noir “Cheating At Blackjack” videotape (available from Rouge et Noir, Box 6, Glen Head, N.Y.. 11545). Joe Baseel deftly executes the deal in segment #9. It’s smooth. It’s fast. It appears natural. But look again. He’s employing that uncommon strike style. On the tape, they refer to this deal as the “pitch out” deal. This is the fast deal which Mr. Baseel demonstrates by turning up the ace on top of the deck.

Unfortunately, the second type of second deal, the pushoff second, closely mimics the dealing action of the majority of honest single-deck blackjack dealers. Like the strike second deal, the push-off second deal is undectable by a player, when executed by an expert. But there are tip-offs you can watch for which will indicate with a fair amount of certainty that a dealer is not capable of dealing push-off seconds. In the next issue of Blackjack Forum, I will describe and illustrate the push-off second deal, and explain the big tip-off. ♠

Posted on Leave a comment

Part 2: The Push-Off Second Deal

by Sam Case
(From Blackjack Forum Vol. II #1, March 1982)
© 1982 Blackjack Forum

[Ed. Note: In “The Second Deal, Part I” Sam Case described what a second deal was, explaining the difference between the two types of second deals, the strike second deal, and the push-off second deal. The strike second deal was described in detail so that a player could detect the tip-off that a dealer might be employing this uncommon method of cheating. In this article, Sam Case describes the push-off second deal. –Arnold Snyder]

What the Push-Off Second Deal Looks Like

To facilitate dealing the push-off second, the deck is held in the left hand in the Mechanic’s Grip. As illustrated in Blackjack Forum Vol. I #4 this grip alone is not a tip-off that a dealer might be cheating. This is the most common method of holding the deck for any single-deck dealer. Likewise, most dealers, and almost all honest ones, are push-off dealers. By this, I mean that they push the top card slightly off the deck with the left thumb, so that the right thumb and forefinger can easily deal the card.

The push-off second dealer appears to be using the same dealing style, when in actuality he is pushing off the top two cards, perfectly aligned. The right thumb and forefinger then pinch the two cards, as if they were a single-card to be dealt. However, the left thumb now draws the top card back to its original position on top of the deck, while the right (dealing) hand simultaneously whips the second card out from under the top card, and deals it.

Push-Off Second Deal Tip-offs

You cannot visually detect whether the top or the second card is being dealt. The motion is too quick to see. There are a number of tip-offs you can watch for that would indicate that you may be in the presence of a push-off second dealer.

Tip-off #1: Some push-off second dealers hold the deck slightly fanned or spread in the left hand. This makes it easier to push off two cards with the left thumb.

Tip-off #2: The push-off second dealer must make precise contact with his left (push-off) thumb and the top two cards only. He can only do this by pushing the cards with his thumb from the outer edge or the left side Or the deck. Most honest dealers push off the top card with the left thumb on top of the deck, away from the edge. Pushing from the edge is a tip-off that a dealer may be pushing two cards. See Figures #1 and #2.

Tip-off #3: The left thumb never leaves the top of the deck. This is the most obvious tip-off.

An honest dealer, after pushing off the top card, most often lifts his thumb to facilitate dealing the top card. The push-off second dealer must control the top card as he deals the second.

Many honest dealers lift their “push-off” thumb an inch or more above the top of the deck in order to deal the pushed-off top card. Honest dealers also frequently describe small “circles” with the push-off thumb as they deal—pushing, lifting the thumb, and circling back to the top card after the pushed off card is dealt.

The push-off second dealer cannot do this, as he must use his left thumb to slide the top card back into its original position on top of the deck. If you observe most dealers closely, you can easily see that the left thumb does not clamp down on the top card as (or after) the card is dealt.

If you clearly see that the dealer’s left thumb never lifts off the deck, beware. If the dealer’s hand motion coincides with the deal in such a way that you can’t be sure whether or not the left thumb is lifted off the top card during the deal, beware. Card mechanics often disguise their work by using unnecessary hand motions, such as well-timed tilting, swinging, arcing, etc.

Finally, some tip-offs of a “sloppy” second are: Hesitation during the deal; re-squaring a pushed-off card and starting the deal over; dealing two cards as one, especially a dealer who winds up with two hole cards. If you see any of the tip-offs described above, beware, especially if you’re losing. You may or may not be in the presence of a second dealer, but don’t take chances. Once you know what to look for, you’ll see clearly that most singledeck dealers you encounter are probably not dealing seconds.

Joe Baseel performs a push-off second deal on the Rouge et Noir “Cheating At Blackjack” videotape*. Note the awkward grip that the right hand uses to grip the pushed-off cards fingers at the far end, thumb at the rear end. Never play against a dealer who does this. Joe Baseel is an expert, and you cannot “see” the push-off second being dealt, but you can see his unnatural dealing style when you know what to look for. [Note from Arnold Snyder: For a more recent demonstration of second dealing, see Steve Forte’s excellent Gambling Protection Series, Volume 2.]

Summary of Second Dealing Signals

Any “strike” deal (see Blackjack Forum Vol. I #4).

The dealer holding the deck slightly fanned, not squared.

The left (pushoff) thumb contacting the edge or end, instead of just the top card.

The left thumb never lifting from the top of the deck during the deal.

Unnecessary motion of the left hand during the deal,which may be camouflaging any of the above tip-offs. ♠

Posted on

Interview with Darryl Purpose

Interview with Darryl Purpose – Grizzled Veteran of the Blackjack Wars

by Richard W. Munchkin

(From Blackjack Forum Vol. XXIV #1, Winter 2005)
© 2005 Blackjack Forum

[Richard W. Munchkin is an inductee into the Blackjack Hall of Fame and the author of Gambling Wizards: Conversations with the World’s Greatest Gamblers.]

[Comments from RWM: Though Darryl Purpose is only forty-something, he is a grizzled veteran of the Blackjack Wars. He started playing blackjack almost thirty years ago at the ripe old age of 19. He moved to Las Vegas and learned just enough about counting cards to lose all his money.

He says, “I was the kind of counter that made Las Vegas.” He went from sleeping in his car to a job in a boiler room selling pens. He fell into a familiar pattern in Las Vegas—working a job, and blowing his paycheck. At the same time he must have been learning something about blackjack. A year later he was one of the best players on the Ken Uston team, driving down the Las Vegas Strip in a Rolls Royce with thousands of dollars in his pocket. “Isn’t that why we came?” he says with a smile.

The last bet Darryl made as part of a Ken Uston team was in December of 1979, yet he says that reputation haunts him to this day. In Two Books on Blackjack, Ken Uston named Darryl as one of the four best blackjack players in the world, but playing with Ken “was not a badge of honor,” says Darryl. “Still, the reason you want to interview me is because I was part of the Ken Uston team.”

It’s true. That is why I wanted to interview Darryl. But then I heard the stories of what happened after 1979. Stories that will take you from Moscow to Sri Lanka. Blackjack tales of the Sicilian Mafia, the Russian Mob, the Japanese Yakuza, and the Tamil Tigers, who invented suicide bombing.

Matter-of-fact stories of running over to Caesars Palace to play a hole card because they needed a down payment on a house, or winning a million dollars with Thor, a shuffle-tracking computer. For Darryl it was his job. “My job was to play until they didn’t allow me, and then take the money home. I really didn’t consider whether it was dangerous.”

Darryl is also a talented musician, who now does 150 concerts a year as a touring singer/songwriter. I’ve seen him in concert, and his audience is mesmerized by his tales of traveling the world playing his guitar, and yes, blackjack.]

RWM: How did you first get interested in blackjack?

Darryl: My mother put a copy of Beat the Dealer in my Christmas stocking when I was 16. I was interested in cards and games, and I had a natural affinity for math, so it appealed to me. I’ve since forgiven her.

RWM: You couldn’t play at that age. [Legal gambling age is 21.]

Darryl: Right. I was a little bit lost when I got out of high school, but I signed up for college. I was a classical guitar major. My left hand started to hurt for some reason, and they put a splint on it. I had only one hand to use so I practiced finger picking. Then my right hand went. So there I was, a classical guitar major at Cal State Northridge, with splints on both hands. I dropped out of school, got in my ’62 Chevy, and headed to Vegas. I had $50, a couple of shirts, and my guitar.

RWM: Were you 21?

Darryl: I was 19. I spent the $50 to get a room for a week downtown. I wandered around living off the free breakfasts and other freebies. I landed a job selling ballpoint pens in a phone room.

It was cold calling. I’d call Joe’s Auto Parts in Fargo, North Dakota. Joe, this is Jack Baker at DD Enterprises here in Las Vegas. We’ve got a problem here, and I’m hoping you can help me out. We got a regular customer down in Texas, Joe’s Auto Parts in Fort Worth. Now Joe put in an order for those Deluxe Writograph Pens, with the printing on them. They last forever and have a lifetime guarantee. Anyway, so what happened is my secretary put an extra 0 on the order, and instead of 500 pens we got 5000 pens. Now I’m willing to…

It was like that. Of course they didn’t pay you right away. They paid you a commission the following week. I was on the street for a little while. Then I was offered a room with one of the other guys who worked there. I think my first paycheck was $20. The next week was $50, and the next week was $200. I went to the Stardust and gambled with $50. I turned it into $500. I thought, “This is easy.”

RWM: You had learned to count already?

Darryl: I had read Thorp’s book. I was a bad counter like thousands of other people. I thought I knew something about counting, and I thought that maybe it was enough. That night I was the kind of counter that made Las Vegas.

From there it was a year and a half of working this phone job, and regularly losing my paycheck. I was living week to week, and never making any money. One day I was in the Horseshoe spreading 1 to 4 in dollars. I was counting the Hi-Opt I with a side count of aces. There was another guy at the table, and he was going 1 to 4 in nickels. I noticed from his play that not only was he counting cards, but also I could tell he was using a side count of aces.

I followed him when he left the casino. Somebody at the phone room had told me that there were professional teams out there. At that point to me they were very dark and mysterious, and not something I thought I would ever have any access to.

RWM: Where did you get the Hi-Opt I?

Darryl: That came from a guy I worked with in the boiler room.

RWM: What year was this?

Darryl: Probably 1976. So I followed the guy out of the Horseshoe, and he thought I was from the casino. I followed him into the Fremont coffee shop. I said, “Hey, you’re a card counter.” He said, “I don’t know what you’re talking about.” I told him, “I’m a card counter, too. I count the Hi-Opt I with a side of aces.”

That player was a guy named Art. We became friends. He lived in Berkeley at 21 Channing Street. He would say, “My age is 21. My address is 21. And my profession is 21.” He knew more than I did about professional teams because he had met a guy from the Bay area who was one of the big players on the Ken Uston team.

Art and I formed a little team with a $2,000 bankroll. We ran around playing single-deck betting up to $20. I was losing, and Art was winning, but overall we were down. It was all Art’s money, so it was not fun.

You know the problem with blackjack? It is that the bankrolls that are no fun drag on forever. The bankrolls that are really great are over really quick. You spend most of your career down.

One day Art said he knew one of the top BP’s on the Ken Uston team was living in the same apartment complex as me. It was a crummy little complex called Enchanted Gardens on Swenson. I went around the corner in my complex, and knocked on this guy’s door. I said, “Hi, I’m Darryl. I’m your neighbor, and I play blackjack.”

His name was Ron Karr. Ron is a nice guy and he invited me in, even though he didn’t know me from Adam. I asked him about cheating, because we were losing and I didn’t understand why. He offered some advice, and I went on my way.

A week later I knocked on the door a second time. I had more questions. That second time he offered me a job. The team would pay me $25 per shift to count down decks and call in the big player. I pulled Art into that also. So we counted down decks for players on Ron’s team. I called my mother and said, “Mom, I’m a professional.”

RWM: Ron was not playing with Ken at this point?

Darryl: No, he had split from Ken. I remember the first time we got barred was at the Marina. They knew everything. We had just started, and this pit boss comes up and points at me. He said, “You,” then he pointed at Art, “And you,” and he pointed to the BP, “And you. If you guys don’t want to end up in the desert, you get out of here right now, and don’t come back.” That was exciting, so I called my Mom again and said, “Mom, it works.”

At some point during that time I quit my job selling pens, and that was the last real job I had. Ron’s team was trying to make a little money counting while they worked on developing a shuffle-tracking computer. Art and I were calling BP’s into hot shoes not knowing that this R & D was going on. Apparently it wasn’t going so well.

At one point one of the players wanted to put up $10,000 to form a counting team to bet up to $100 on single deck. He invited Art and me to be part of that. There were six of us. I wasn’t even 21 yet, and it wasn’t so long ago that I had arrived penniless in Las Vegas, and I remember thinking, “Bet $100!”

My apartment was $200 a month. I was earning $200 a week at the boiler room. The idea of walking into a casino and betting $100 made me very nervous. We were going to play single-deck 1 to 4 in quarters. We won some money, and they raised the top bet to $200. I thought, this is too much, I would have to quit and go back to Los Angeles. I don’t remember the transition exactly, but soon after that I was the guy who always wanted to bet more.

RWM: How much did that team win?

Darryl: We ended up winning about $60,000 which was a great win back then, especially considering we started with a $10,000 bank.

RWM: How did it end?

Darryl: Well, I guess they were ready to focus on the non-random shuffle machine they were building. Art and I hadn’t known anything about it, but we were invited to a big meeting where we were told about it, and invited to participate.

They were going to split the money according to pre-arranged percentages based on how valuable a player was deemed to be to the project. Down at the bottom of the list were Art and me who would each get ¾ of 1% of the win. On the one hand, it was not much, and on the other it was a generous offer they made to two green wanna-be counters.

RWM: But you were going to have to put in hours.

Darryl: Yes. We were good counters, but we were 20 and 21 at that point. At the end of this one of the players said, “You have another option. I happen to know that Ken Uston’s team is looking for players. You can try out for them, or you can stay here with the shuffle-tracking computer team.” True to our personalities, Art picked the computer team, and I picked the Ken Uston team. The Ken mystique was pretty compelling to this twenty year old, at least for a while.

RWM: Did that computer ever come into existence?

Darryl: No. So I made the right decision as it turned out.

RWM: So, now you must go meet the great Ken Uston.

Darryl: Exactly. He was already the world’s most famous blackjack player. Of course, that was because none of the real blackjack players want to be famous. That didn’t matter to me. I was totally in awe of him. It was like hearing that Stevie Wonder needed a player in his band, and getting an audition. I counted really well at the time. I quickly made my place on the team because I tested so well.

RWM: Tell me about the first meeting.

Darryl: I might have just met his partner Bill first. Bill and Ken were running the team. They were operating out of the Jockey Club. I met him, and then there was some testing. The stories of Ken and the Jockey Club were mythic. All the debauchery and excellent card playing combined in this mysterious scene. I got to the Jockey Club, and it was just as advertised.

RWM: Debauchery and card playing?

Darryl: Drugs and women and really good card counting.

RWM: Do you remember what the test was?

Darryl: It’s not clear in my mind, but I’m sure it was counting down shoes. Also, they would flash hands at you on a slide projector, and you had to tell them the index number. Then they would deal hands to you, and check the cards left at the end of the shoe.

What they were looking for were people to call plays for a big player. That began my training for calling plays. I’ve probably called more plays than I have played myself. There were some classic BP’s on that team. Jimmy, the southern gentleman—we were worried about heat at the Hilton and had told him to wade into the play, not to bet so much that it would attract their attention. But when he sat down they asked him for ID and he was furious. He said, “Here’s my ID!!” as he whipped out $20,000 cash and threw it on the table.

Ike was a cool one. He always had a girlfriend, and he always called her “George,” so he wouldn’t slip up in front of his wife. The downside of playcalling at that time was that they sent me out on my first plays into incredibly steamy situations with BPs that were already very hot. I was barred right away, and they knew I was part of the Ken Uston team. Within weeks I was completely Griffinized for life.

RWM: Did you have any hard barrings?

Darryl: I had a hard barring at the Hilton shortly after the Jimmy incident. This was shortly after Mark Estes [a card counter] got beat up there. I had just lost $10,000 with a BP and they dragged me to the back room. They 86ed me and trespassed me.

RWM: Did you call your mom?

Darryl: No. At that point it wasn’t fun anymore. I didn’t like getting thrown out. I took it personally. One time I was calling plays on the single-deck at Caesars. I was betting quarters while the BP was betting thousands on the other side of the table. At some point I hear the pit boss say, “Oh, there’s Purpose. He must have lost his bankroll. He’s down to betting quarters.” They never caught on. Caesars at that time had a no-barring policy. They were the classy joint back then.

RWM: I’ve read that you were the fastest card counter on the team.

Darryl: I got really good at counting down a single-deck. Part of it was smoke and mirrors, and didn’t translate into play on the table. I got to a point where it was really about how quickly you could spread the cards.

Someone would say with a stopwatch would say “Go” and I’d spread the cards and be looking at about 10 cards at a time. I’d look at the last cards and say, “stop,” and fold the deck up in one big motion. What they didn’t know was I was still counting because I had taken a mental picture of the last quarter of the deck. I could regularly count a single-deck in 10 seconds.

RWM: Weren’t there races or contests with substantial money bet?

Darryl: There was one legendary contest between the West Coasters and the East Coasters. This was shortly after the Atlantic City no-barring period. We were in Las Vegas. One of the East Coast guys had brought in a ringer. Although this guy never did that well in a casino, he could really count down a deck, especially six decks. We had an all-night session, and we had bet a lot of money on this. I was the reigning deck-counting champion, and Joe was the ringer newbie.

RWM: When you say you bet a lot of money, are we talking thousands?

Darryl: Yeah. Of course our pride was more important than the money. This happened at four in the morning. Who knows what debauchery had gone on before that, and we hadn’t slept. It was going to be a best two out of three. I won the first round, and Joe won the second. We both thought we were counting slow, but we thought it was because it was late and we had been drinking. After the counting of the first deck I went to my friend Craig and said, “I counted 26 aces.” Craig said, “Oh shit.” This was six decks and we were counting Hi-Opt I with a side count of aces.

RWM: Didn’t you have to give a count?

Darryl: I gave a count but I said there were two aces left. I figured I would be off by a whole deck not just two. I didn’t tell them what I actually counted. I told them what I thought were left, and I won the first round.

RWM: How many cards were they holding out?

Darryl: It was six decks so they would take out six cards. The second round I count 28 aces. I went to Craig and said, “There are seven decks there.” Joe was doing the same thing. He was getting the wrong ace count, but he wasn’t admitting it to anyone.

Going into the third round I knew there were seven decks. I knew why the times were slow, so I wasn’t trying to push it. I won the last round because I had the correct count and he was off by one because he was rushing so much. We finished, and we were celebrating. I turned to Joe and said, “Joe, how many decks are there?” “That’s it!” he screamed. “There are seven decks there!!” It was quite funny.

RWM: When you started with Ken, was he still using hidden computers?

Darryl: I think I came in right as the computer project using George ended. [George was the first blackjack computer developed by Keith Taft. Some of the details of his teaming with Ken Uston were discussed in my interview with Al Francesco in the Summer 2002 issue of Blackjack Forum. You will find the interview in the Blackjack Forum Gambling Library on this Web site.]

When I first joined we had BPs [Big Players], and we just called plays for them. They had just come up with this idea where they would have the BP signal what his hand was. The counter had to count the cards, bet and play his own hand, and take the signal from the BP from across the table by the way he held his cards. This was supposed to give you exactly what he had in his hand so you could count it.

RWM: Rather than just show you his cards.

Darryl: There was some heat on that, so they thought this was a good idea. But what happened was that all the counters started making a ton of mistakes. We weren’t winning any money, and they stopped that idea and got rid of all the counters except for me. I was testing really well at that time.

RWM: I’ll bet that made the players really like Ken.

Darryl: A lot of players didn’t like Ken–certainly anyone who wasn’t willing to overlook Ken’s gratuitous self-aggrandizement. I had a soft spot, and mostly forgave Ken all that. But that led to a lot of problems for me, because one of the fired players became a counter catcher for the casinos. He really came after me.

RWM: Why would the firing make him mad at you?

Darryl: I was an easy target. He knew me, and I had a look that I couldn’t disguise well. The fact that I was a member of the Uston team made me a good catch. He could show off to the casinos by nailing me more so than some guy who didn’t have an association with Ken.

Craig joined in August of ‘78, which was right after this mass firing. They decided to do things differently, and it was basically a sham business model they came up with.

Ken got big players who were willing to put up money. Ken and his book, The Big Player, impressed them. He had this team of expert card counters. We would call plays for these big players and then split the money 50-50 at the end of every trip. One of the BPs that won a lot of money rented a Rolls Royce. He gave us the Rolls for the last week of the rental. It was 1977; I was 20 years old and driving around Las Vegas in a Rolls Royce with thousands of dollars in my pocket. Isn’t that why we came?

RWM: This was a pretty sweet deal for you guys. You take no loss but get half the win?

Darryl: This was how I split from Ken the first time. There was one BP who lost money on a trip, and he talked Ken into carrying the loss over onto the next trip. Bill was really running the team at that point. Bill went for that for a couple of trips but we ended up stuck. At that point Bill said, “That’s it. We aren’t going to work with you anymore.”

RWM: Because he didn’t want to make up the loss?

Darryl: Right. In fact, the deal was that it was per trip and Bill had gone much further than the original deal called for. Of course the deal he had cut in the first place was not good for the BP. [See Beyond Counting, pages 59-60.]

At that point Craig and I said to the BP, “We’ll make your money back for you. And we’ll make 50% after that.” Again, we were 21 or 22 with a chance to really make some big money. We did that. We got them even and then started using a strategy of betting half of what we were up.

Most of our plays were first-basers, so you had an edge all the time. We made some good scores that way. [A first-baser is a dealer who reveals his hole card when checking under a ten or ace for blackjack. Casinos stopped checking under tens in the mid ’80s because of advantage players exploiting this weakness.]

Craig and I decided to buy a condo from a friend. We had to come up with $20,000 as a down payment. We needed the money on a Monday, and come Saturday night we had about $1,500 each. We hadn’t really played on our own. We had only worked with teams.

“Where can we get $20,000?” we’re asking ourselves. It occurred to both of us, “Let’s go play a first-baser at Caesars.” There was a problem because Craig had been calling plays there a lot, and one of us had to BP. Craig went out and got a dark wig and a pair of glasses. He came over to a friend’s house where I was staying. He knocked on the door, and our friend let him in. I said, “Hi, I’m Darryl.” I did not recognize him. We went out and won the down payment.

At one point we brought Art in to BP for us. We were still using the “Bet half of what you are up” strategy. Art was a very “by the book” kind of guy. We were a little concerned about his willingness to bet it up. We wanted to do this now with our own money. In the past it was the BP’s money.

So three of us and Art went to play first-basers for a weekend at the MGM in Reno. Art was going to BP, and the other three of us were going to read. [The “reader” is the person who spots the hole card, and then relays that information to the Big Player.] We each put in $2,500 so we had a $10,000 bank.

Until this point Art was very systematic, scientific, and conservative about the whole thing. We had to remind him that we wanted to really bet it up. Going into the very last play we were even. I wasn’t going to be playing the last session, and I went by the game to see how it was going. Art was betting five hands of the limit, which was $1,000. He won $40,000 on that play. I think this was the weekend where Art really found himself, because he later went on to set new standards for betting ridiculous amounts of money.

RWM: When did you get back together with Ken?

Darryl: Ken called and told me about the first no-barring period in Atlantic City. I’m really drawn to colorful people, and Ken did have a lot of charm. He called and said, “Come to Atlantic City. There’s a game here.” I went and joined the team. This was the team he wrote about in Two Books on Blackjack.

I was out there for two weeks. I was 22 years old and sharing a hotel room with Ken Uston and Ron Karr. Two years earlier I was homeless on the streets of Vegas. Now I’m sharing a hotel room with Babe Ruth and Joe Dimagio. I was on a rollaway and they had their own beds. Ken and I were friends, as best as someone could become a friend with Ken. He was in a constant battle with chemical dependency. He eventually died from it at 53, overdosing on heroin in Paris.

I saw Ken in many weak and vulnerable moments. He cried in front of me a number of times. I ran into him right after he had been beaten up in Reno. Several bones in his face had been broken. I did care about him, but I also spent most of my life trying to get over the heat I got from being on the Ken Uston team. I also wanted to prove myself to other blackjack players. Being a member of the Uston team was not necessarily a badge of honor.

We accomplished a lot, and did a lot of innovative and interesting things after my association with Ken. Still, the reason you want to interview me is because I was part of the Ken Uston team. Ken Uston is still the world’s most famous blackjack player.

RWM: Let’s talk about that first trip to Atlantic City in 1979. How many people were on the team?

Darryl: Well, both the no-barring periods actually happened in 1979, the first in January and the second in December. I met Ron, my neighbor from the Enchanted Gardens, and Mark Estes at the Philadelphia airport. Mark was notable for getting beaten up by a security guard at the Hilton in 1977. That was a big deal because they hadn’t gotten physical with card counters (that we knew of) before that.

We were all college dropouts who were good at math. We were not tough guys in any way. That was a big deal. [Mark Estes successfully sued the Hilton.]

We went to Atlantic City together from the airport. We stayed in a crummy little $23 per night motel. Ken was trying to come up with maybe $25,000 as a bankroll. The world’s most famous blackjack player, and here he was trying to scrounge together a bankroll. I remember it was cold. I’m from Southern California, and it was colder than anything I had ever experienced. I didn’t understand why people would live in a place that got that cold. We had to walk from the motel to the casino.

RWM: Why was there no bankroll?

Darryl: I didn’t have any money. Mark and Ron didn’t have any money. In the book Ken claims his money was all invested in this and that. The fact was that none of us put any of the talent that we had, to squeeze every last hundredth of a percentage point out of a blackjack game, into our personal finances. Over the course of my career that never changed. I made a lot of money, and pissed it away. When I got into music I had less than nothing to lose.

RWM: Was it just the four of you, or were there more on the team?

Darryl: There were others. There was a guy in Philadelphia who had told Ken the no barring policy was coming. He had a full-time job in Philadelphia, and was a part-time counter. Ken wanted to believe that our team members were better than anyone else.

At that time a lot of people still used the Revere Advanced Point Count, a three-level count. A lot of people believed that using this stronger count was a lot better than any one-level count could be. Over the years this was revealed to be not true, particularly with the shoe game. As it turned out, simpler was better.

Anyway, this guy wasn’t testing that well, and someone had seen him make some mistakes. We were considering whether or not to let him play on the team. We were having a meeting in the hotel room. Ken and Ron decided they needed to talk in private, so they went into the closet. Then they called me in, and then Mark went in the closet. At some point the entire team was in the closet, and he was in the room with the bankroll spread out on the bed in cash. We all started laughing, and that was bad. [In Two Books on Blackjack Uston relates this story of the closet on page 42. He calls the player, “Ty.”]

RWM: Did he end up staying, or being voted out?

Darryl: He was voted off that bank, but then we made a bankroll and he was allowed to play on the next one. He had some restrictions on his earnings. I forget exactly, but I think it was based on him winning. Eventually he was brought back in, and did win some money. All along he was allowed to invest in the bankroll.

RWM: Sure, you guys needed the cash.

Darryl: Well, at some point Ken hooked up with Peter. Now there was an interesting match. Those guys had polar opposite ways of doing everything. I was caught in the middle. I had met Peter in Las Vegas through the Czechs, and I had run into Peter in Europe in 1978. [Cathy Hulbert talks about this bankroll in Atlantic City in the book Gambling Wizards.]

By the way, I read what Cathy said about this bank in Gambling Wizards, and I don’t think it’s true that Ken didn’t want her to play because she was a woman. He didn’t want her to play because of the power balance. I really think that was the case. That doesn’t make him any better of a person, but that’s the way I remember it.

Cathy was Peter’s girlfriend, and if they were both on the team, that might have upset the tenuous balance of power. We had some power structure on the team that was some democracy and some dictatorship, so if Cathy were a player, to the extent we were democratic, Cathy would have had a voice. Then Peter and Cathy’s voices together, well… Peter’s voice alone really threatened Ken. They had incredible clashes.

RWM: What were the arguments over?

Darryl: Anything. Peter liked to do things by the book. When you went to dinner with Peter he would break the bill down to the penny. He thought nothing of getting change for that nickel. He insisted on it. That couldn’t have been farther from the way Ken did things. They both needed to be in control, but they couldn’t. They both saw an advantage to working together to build a larger bankroll and bet more money. I wonder what was in it for Peter really? For Ken it really was about not having any cash.

RWM: In Two Books on Blackjack there was a big rivalry with the Czech team. Was this just in Ken’s mind, or was there competition there?

Darryl: Oh yeah. It was a friendly rivalry for the most part. In the book he talks about a four o’clock meeting that he called with the heads of all the teams. That may be true, but there were a lot of other things going on that didn’t involve him in such a pivotal way. He doesn’t mention any of those other things. The thing I loved about the Czechs at that time was, whenever someone made some large bet, the dealers would call out, “Checks play.” It was hilarious.

It was on this bank that I won my first 15 sessions, which pretty much puts to rest all the argument of, who is the best blackjack player in the world. [laughing]

RWM: You said this bank lasted two weeks.

Darryl: Yeah.

RWM: What was your payday? Did you make a bunch of money?

Darryl: It says in the book I made $11,000. I can’t argue with that since I don’t remember.

RWM: He put that in the book?

Darryl: Yeah. I had no investment. I went down to the Honda dealership with a friend, and we both bought Honda 750s. I had barely ever ridden a motorcycle, but we bought them and drove to Los Angeles.

RWM: After Atlantic City did you and Ken play hole cards?

Darryl: I don’t think Ken ever got into hole cards.

RWM: He talks about it in his book.

Darryl: He heard something about it, but he didn’t play them a lot, as far as I remember. I’ve been talking to a screenwriter in Hollywood who is interested in doing a screenplay, partly on blackjack, and partly on the story of my life. Because of that I reread Two Books on Blackjack, and I just read Million Dollar Blackjack for the first time.

One of the most amazing things I discovered in reading these books is that, the fact that I played with the Ken Uston team, that I was a friend of his, has colored my entire blackjack existence. I did the math, and the last time I placed a bet as a member of a Ken Uston team was December of 1979. Yet it is a huge part of my blackjack identity.

History is not what happened. Ken wrote the books. I had never read Million Dollar Blackjack, even though I knew I was in the book. At the time I was trying to distance myself from Ken for a lot of reasons.

So I start reading it recently, and he was saying that blackjack is the only game where you use your skill to change the odds. He’s explaining this, and I’m thinking, “Yeah, this is really solid. I guess this is a good blackjack book.” But the best lies have a large element of truth in them. He started talking about the history of blackjack, and he mentions the paper in 1956. Then he starts talking about Revere and the Advanced Point Count, and I was thinking, “Wow, this is really comprehensive.”

Then boom, he leaves out Wong and the Hi-Lo completely, and inserts Stanley Roberts into the history of blackjack counts and how they developed. I was amazed. I’m guessing the Stanley Roberts count he mentions is the Hi-Lo. It was so well-written it almost fooled me. He left out the 1959 Dubner paper, and he left out Wong’s book. Most professional blackjack players consider themselves counters of that “Hi-Lo.”

I read the story of what he calls Team Six. This was the second no-barring period in Atlantic City in December 1979 and the few months leading up to it. At that time I was living with Ken in a small studio apartment on the boardwalk in Atlantic City.

This place was no bigger than most people’s kitchens. It had two Murphy beds, and we ran a team out of this place and lived there for months. In the book he was talking about the Casino Commission, and all the work that he was doing to try to make everyone happy. But nobody was interested in a game where skilled players could play alongside bad players and everyone, including the casinos, would be happy. In the book he’s trying to create this, and it very much colors the whole story.

I read about the team, and I read about how we had these big wins in the beginning. I remembered it so well. With the early surrender we had a slight edge off the top. We were betting half Kelly. Our bankroll got so big that we were able to bet table max, $1,000, off the top. Then he starts talking about how the casinos were over-reporting counters’ wins, and how all that played out. Then he said that we thought about under-reporting our wins, but then decided against it.

He goes on to say that we lost most of our money, and people began to drift away even before the barrings were allowed again. The game wasn’t that good anymore because they were only dealing half a shoe. He says we ended up breaking even. I was reading this thinking, “God, I thought we won a lot of money.” Then I realized—he made all that up! Of course we won a lot of money. I think we won $680,000.

I think Ken learned some lessons from Two Books on Blackjack, because Million Dollar Blackjack is much better written. The self-aggrandizement in Two Books on Blackjack is so on his sleeve. It makes it a horribly written book and I cringed when I read it. At one point I thought I couldn’t finish it.

RWM: After Atlantic City did you go back to Vegas?

Darryl: I went back to playing with Craig in Vegas. Craig and I worked together for most of fifteen years. I think we went to Aruba in April of that year. They had early surrender, and it was another counter convention. We started saving our chips. We weren’t cashing them because we didn’t want them to know how much we had won.

At some point they changed the chips, and announced that if you didn’t cash the old chips in the next 24 hours you wouldn’t be able to. The heat was coming down. Craig was the guinea pig to go cash out the chips. He got the cash, and came back to the room. I was in the bathtub. He said, “Darryl, we have to go now.” He just told me this story recently. He said I got out of the bathtub, did not dry off, and threw on my clothes.

We grabbed our things, my guitar and suitcases, and took the elevator down to the basement. We walked out to the beach, down the beach half a mile, and caught a taxi to the airport. Two months later I ran into a guy who was there when that happened. He said, “Where were you guys? The security guards were looking all over the island for you.”

RWM: How much money was it?

Darryl: I don’t remember, but the limits were much lower then. I remember that was the first time I played shuffle tracking. That was April of 1979.

RWM: I wanted to ask about that. I remember hearing that Ken threw people off the team for attempting to shuffle track.

Darryl: That was the second trip to Atlantic City. He just didn’t believe it was the same as counting down a deck and knowing exactly what was left. There was a guy named Q who worked with the team. His thing was a little more exotic than shuffle tracking. He tracked shuffles of new decks. He thought there were clumps, so if he saw a bunch of fours and fives, he believed there were more fours and fives coming and would adjust his play accordingly.

In Million Dollar Blackjack there was one style of play that was notable for its inclusion, and one notable for its absence. Front loading was notable for its inclusion. Nobody had really talked about it to the extent that Ken did in that book. That didn’t make a lot of people happy. The thing he left out was shuffle tracking.

RWM: How long before the phone call came again to go back to Atlantic City?

Darryl: So much happened during that time. We played some first-basers, some front loaders, we counted cards, we called plays for BPs. It seems like we had a million different little bankrolls. Craig and I bought the condo in Vegas, which was our team place for many years.

Then Ken called again, and that was when I had the little apartment with him on the boardwalk. We played some blackjack, trained some people, and ran the team out of there.

RWM: How long were you there this time?

Darryl: I would say from August to December of ’79.

RWM: Was this the same group of guys on this team, minus Peter?

Darryl: No, it was a different group. We invited a lot of players out. I invited my uncle; we trained a guy named Jack from Cherry Hill, New Jersey. He made enough money to go back and buy the pool hall he had been playing in his whole life.

I think Ron was there, but Mark wasn’t. Craig and Matt came. We remembered how we won like pigs in January. We were going to be ready for December 1st. When December 1st came we had a large group of experienced guys, and a good-sized bankroll. It was at least $100,000, which was good sized for that time. We won a ton of money.

RWM: Do you remember how much?

Darryl: I’m guessing $680,000, but Ken lied in the book so we may never know. I think it lasted nine days, or maybe thirteen days.

RWM: I heard that although you won a ton of money, you somehow managed to lose three cars.

Darryl: Well, it was over a period of five months.

RWM: How exactly did that happen?

Darryl: Remembering how that happened would require the same brain cells that would have prevented it from happening in the first place. I do remember one situation. There were two casinos open at the time. Caesars had opened in addition to Resorts International. At that time, these were the only casinos in the United States outside Nevada.

I had a safety deposit box at Resorts. I wanted to play at Caesars. I pulled up to the door at Resorts because there didn’t look like there was any place to park. It was really cold there, so I just left the car running with the heater on. I went in to get my money, and I thought as I went in that I would go check the game. I went around, and sure enough there was an empty table in the high limit pit.

The high limit pit generally had fewer decks and better penetration. I sat down to play, and ended up staying there for eight hours. I went out and got a taxi back to the apartment, which was team headquarters. At some point someone said, “Where is the car?” I didn’t even think about it. Then someone said, “Didn’t you take the car this morning, Darryl?” “Oh, that’s right.” It turned out the valet had it.

RWM: Were all three of the cars recovered? The three you lost?

Darryl: I don’t think I lost any cars for good. That would be irresponsible. [laughing]

RWM: When the no-barring policy ended, they went to the three-step barring policy. After the third step people were getting arrested for trespassing. Did you suffer many of these arrests?

Darryl: No. I think I left before that. They never barred me. Some time later I was back in the club, I don’t remember why, but I wasn’t playing. They asked me to leave, and I said, “No, you can’t ask me to leave. The rules say you must first ask the person not to play blackjack. If they play, then you can ask them to leave.” We disagreed over this, and they carried me out.

RWM: You’re a big guy. How many of them did it take to carry you out?

Darryl: One on each limb. It was a passive resistance on my part.

RWM: Sort of like lying down at the Nevada nuclear test site?

Darryl: Exactly. It was all training for my future anti-war activism.

RWM: You lay down, and they picked you up and carried you through the casino.

Darryl: I didn’t lie down. I was standing. Two guys grabbed my arms, and two guys picked up my feet.

RWM: Was anyone saying anything as they carried you through the casino? Or was this just a normal day in Atlantic City?

Darryl: You know how oblivious people are in the casino. It would take a lot more than that to get a gambler’s attention.

RWM: What did they do once they got you out the door?

Darryl: They dropped me on the sidewalk.

RWM: You were injured from this, right?

Darryl: Yeah, I hurt my shoulder.

RWM: You did sue, and win. How much was the settlement, or are you not allowed to say?

Darryl: I did win, but I can’t say.

RWM: So the team did really well, do you remember what your paycheck was this time?

Darryl: I think it was thirty or forty thousand.

RWM: What did you do then?

Darryl: I probably pissed it away as fast as I possibly could. Actually, I gambled. One of the handful of times in my life. I decided to blow $500. I went to the craps table, and bet $100 on the pass line and took odds.

I turned the $500 into $1,000 and went to the baccarat table. I bet $500 per hand, and kept betting more as I won. They all knew that I was Darryl Purpose, professional card counter. They also knew that professional card counters don’t play baccarat or any other game unless they have an edge. It drove them nuts.

I won 13 consecutive hands in baccarat. My last hand I lost some huge bet. Maybe the limit was only $5,000. I lost a hand and said, “Thank you very much,” and walked with $20,000.

RWM: They are probably still studying those tapes trying to figure out what you were doing.

Darryl: They probably are.

RWM: What kind of testing did you guys have for that team in Atlantic City?

Darryl: We had them count down single-decks and six-deck shoes. Single decks we wanted them to count in thirteen seconds.

RWM: That’s quite fast.

Darryl: Then I would deal to them and count along, and ask them about how they were playing. They would have to make bets according to some prescribed bet plan. If I found it interesting to do so I would ask them how much they would bet if there were another deck in the discard tray. I knew that not only could they make the right play, but also that they could easily calculate whatever the right play was at any time. They might make a play, and I would ask how close a call that was. They would describe the way they thought about calculating the true count.

Part II

RWM: If you were to go back to blackjack, do you prefer working with a few people or a big team?

Darryl: I guess I’d prefer a small group of guys that I was tight with. In the old days I lived with teammates. Now it wouldn’t be like that. If I were to play blackjack again, I’d like to work with a small group of guys who had known each other for a long time. I was on one team or another for over twenty years, but it’s been many years now since I’ve played a hand of blackjack in a casino. Why leave home when you don’t have to?

RWM: You have been on big teams, and small teams. A question that comes up all the time is how do you compensate the people on the team?

Darryl: It was simple in the beginning. Half the money went to the investors in proportion to the amount they invested, and half went to the players, according to some combination of hours played, and money won.

There were two schools of thought; one that the win should be distributed according to hours played and that players shouldn’t lose out because they had a bad run. I always liked crediting a player for their win, partly because some players would consistently win more.

In those early days I was fairly naive. I was a team player, and in the beginning assumed that everyone else would be that way too. When I realized that wasn’t going to be the case every time, I looked for guys to work with where you didn’t have to worry about those things. Most of the bankrolls I’ve been involved in were like that. The few that weren’t, where people tried to take advantage of each other, were huge disappointments and eye openers for me.

RWM: I interviewed Keith Taft and he told me about his shuffle-tracking computer, Thor. How did you get involved with Thor?

Darryl: Oh, two of the sleaziest guys I’ve ever known. [laughing] Do you know who I’m talking about?

RWM: Well, the name Rats Cohen has come up in a number of interviews.

Darryl: That’s him. The other was Bob W. We paid Cohen a lot of money for Thor.

RWM: How did you know Cohen?

Darryl: Hmm, I don’t remember. He got a hold of us, and we bought Thor from him. We set out to learn Thor, and play it. We also bought technical support. I learned first, and then my teammate learned.

I think at that time I was living on the Balboa Peninsula in Newport Beach, California. We had a house on the beach. Ken Uston lived there for a short time. He brought Harry Reasoner over. He was doing a piece for “60 Minutes” about Ken. It was a big bachelor pad with five bedrooms. I also had a place in northern Nevada, and the condo in Vegas.

RWM: Tell me about learning to use Thor.

Darryl: Thor used a binary code system. We had two switches on each foot, one up, one down. On the left foot the up switch was one, and down was two. On the right foot up, four; and down, eight. We entered the exact value of the cards, and the order that they went into the discard rack.

Before we started we would tell the machine what the rules were for that particular game, what kind of shuffle they were doing, and how many decks. When it was time to shuffle the dealer would take the unplayed cards and we had to tell the computer where they were placed. If they were placed in the middle, we had to tell the computer where in the middle.

Then we would tell the computer that the dealer took 51% of the cards and put them on the right. Then the dealer would grab cards from each pile, and we would tell the computer how many cards were in each grab. If the dealer used four “grabs,” you would have four distinct segments of about one and a half decks each in the shoe.

Thor would have a good idea what cards were in each of those segments. The computer would give you an option of cutting the best segment to the front of the shoe, or the worst segment to the back. For cover you would cut the best section to the front so you could bet big off the top. For the best overall game you cut the worst section to the back. Then it would tell you how much to bet, and how to play each hand. It would occasionally make some very bizarre plays.

There was another nonrandom shuffle computer out at that time which was far simpler. It just used the Hi-Lo, and in hindsight I would have used that if I had the option. The people using this other machine only played basic strategy. They never varied their play except for insurance.

Because of that, they didn’t risk the huge negative value of a basic strategy deviation that went wrong due to an inputting mistake or something else. With these NRS computers you were betting big off the top all the time, and you didn’t have to spread that much to have a good edge.

RWM: How long did it take you to learn to use Thor?

Darryl: I was focused and a quick learner. I think I was probably casino ready at it within 100 hours. Because I had some heat in Nevada, we decided to first try it out in European casinos.

RWM: What happened when you got to Europe?

Darryl: We started out in Germany and Belgium but found that the games were unplayable because the machine couldn’t handle those shuffles. Then we went to England. In England, the casinos are private clubs. You have to join, and then wait 48 hours before you can enter.

We joined a bunch of clubs in London, and while we were waiting our 48 hours, we decided to go north of London to a town called Leicester. We signed up for the two casinos in Leicester, but then still had to wait 48 hours. There was a tiny town near Leicester called Enderby. We read in the local paper that they were having a folk festival, so I grabbed my guitar and off we went. I played at the festival, which was held in a large garage. My international debut.

I remember it was the middle of February, and snowing. This wasn’t your typical tourist destination. There was a sock factory in Leicester, so we decided if we got pulled up we would tell them we were businessmen, there to go to the sock factory. What were we thinking?

We bought a book on walks around central England, and I think we may have taken a walk. We went to a play at the Haymarket Theater in Leicester. It was rare that we got time off like this on blackjack trips. For some reason we decided to kill the two days in Leicester rather than London. What was that about? Can I have those two days back?

When you sign up for these casinos, some of them require you to show a passport and some don’t. Our policy was, if they didn’t ask for the passport we would give a fake name. In the first casino we went to in Leicester they didn’t ask for a passport, so we gave a fake name. At the second casino, named Annabelle’s, they did ask for passports, so we used our real names.

Finally we started playing at Annabelle’s. The shuffle was very simple and Nick was sequencing aces while I operated Thor. Everyone in the place was betting two pounds per hand, and I was betting three hands of the maximum, which was either two hundred or five hundred pounds. There was no one betting in between.

We won about 10,000 pounds. Unbeknownst to us, the owner of Annabelle’s called the other casino and asked if two Americans named X and Y had been in there. The owner of the other casino told him that two Americans had signed up but under different names. Anyway, after we were up 10,000 pounds they changed the shuffle and Thor couldn’t handle it, so we quit. We went to cash out and they told us they’d have to give us a check, but would be happy to cash the check if we came back tomorrow. This was the first time that a casino told me they didn’t have enough money to cash the chips. We were from Vegas. We had never heard of such a thing. They told us they would go to the bank the next day, and we could come back and get cash in the morning. Right.

The next morning we had a big discussion about what to do with Thor while we went to the casino to cash out. Should we hide it, or should I wear it in and see if we could maybe play some? We decided I should strap up and consider playing depending on how I was received at the casino.

We got to the casino, and I went to cash the chips while Nick went to check if the game was good. The game wasn’t good anymore, and when my partner came to the cashier to find me, I was gone. They directed him up some stairs to a bar that was closed. When he came up, he found me talking to Scotland Yard.

Now, we had talked about the possibility of being pulled up. Our plan was, if this happened, we would ask for a lawyer and not say anything. But when they separated us for questioning, somehow we both knew that we should break that code and talk to them. They kept saying, “You’re a professional gambler.” I kept telling them I was in real estate. He asked for my business phone number. I gave him a fake number, and he actually picked up the phone and started dialing this number I gave him.

Then he hangs up. Several times they were very close to the evidence they were looking for. They wanted us to admit we were professional gamblers, which we never did. Well, they knew we were professional gamblers. So what? My partner kept saying, “Are you accusing us of doing something wrong?” The police would say, “No, we just want to know you are who you say you are.” They knew we had given different names at the other casino. We gave them our passports.

Eventually they said they wanted to look at our hotel room. So Scotland Yard takes us back to our hotel. They start looking through everything. They look under the towels and take the mattress off the bed. They look in my guitar case. All we are worried about is a briefcase sitting on the end of the bed. In the briefcase are extra toe switches, a soldering iron, lithium batteries, and membership cards in dozens of names for casinos in London, Belgium, Netherlands, and Germany.

We try not to look at the briefcase, but we also are trying not to not look at the briefcase. This whole time we are talking to them, and we are winning them over. They knew this was a roust. We thought they were going to pass up the briefcase entirely. The last thing, he lifts the lid of the briefcase and says, “Well, I guess that’s it then.”

He didn’t look down into the briefcase. He opened it, and didn’t look. In the end, my ankle was the only thing that wasn’t searched. They searched the car, the hotel room, my guitar case, but never searched us. As it turned out, my ankle, where Thor was strapped, was the only place they didn’t search. Then they drove us back to the casino, and the casino cashed our chips. We got the cash, packed our bags, and headed for the next ferry out of Dover.

RWM: Did you go back to Vegas?

Darryl: After I came back from Europe, I went to great lengths to change the way I looked. I lost weight, died and curled my hair, wore brown contact lenses. At the time I couldn’t grow facial hair, so I had a little goatee I put on with spirit gum. I bought it from a makeup guy in Hollywood. I started wearing three-piece suits, which I had never done before. I used makeup, and I got clear glasses. I had a mole removed, and had veneers put on my teeth. Then I legally changed my name. My old identity was history and I was remaking myself.

I wish I could remember some of the bizarre plays Thor would have you make, because Thor didn’t have any discretion. If it felt you could gain half a percent by hitting a hard 18, it would tell you to hit it. There were some very interesting plays. In practice sessions, when it told us to hit a hard 17 we spread the deck, and there would be a bunch of threes and fours.

One of my favorite stories from that time involves us as Shoesmiths. We built our own Thor shoes. We’d buy shoes with a thick rubber sole and cut a hole in the padding in the front of the shoe. We had our tools, and our glue, and Exacto knives. We became little handymen in putting this stuff together.

One of my teammates was working on his shoes with an Exacto knife. It was pointed at his chest and it slipped. It went hard, right into his sternum. There was a loud thwack, and the knife was sticking right into the center of his chest. The funny thing was that the two other teammates that were there didn’t want to drive him to the hospital because they were about to go out on a hole-card play. They didn’t want to miss getting the seat.

He said, “I can’t drive. I have to hold something over my chest so I don’t bleed to death.” They were miffed, but they did drop him off at the emergency room.

RWM: Did you play in the islands with the computer?

Darryl: When I was playing Thor, I was a young twenty-something trying to bet thousands of dollars. We sort of understood this was a difficulty and wished we were older, or Chinese or something. But we didn’t really get it the way it is so obvious now. Looking back, we must have stood out. We tried to dress up, but we weren’t very good at it. We’d buy an expensive pair of shoes, but there was always something a little off. We would pick the wrong tie or something. We tried our best to look like a tourist and not a professional gambler. One of the ways we did this was to get women to go along with us.

The first time I took Thor to St. Martin, I took Sabrina. I knew her through a friend. For her it was just a free vacation. She was a buxom blond. We stayed in one room at the hotel, and my teammate, Bob, came with me on that trip for no other reason than to be my bodyguard. He would watch from afar and move into action if I was pulled up. (I don’t remember what it was he would have done—call the U.S. embassy? Is there a U.S. Embassy in St Martin?). He was staying in the next room. He would have all the equipment, and we never told Sabrina that I was going into this Sicilian-run casino completely wired.

We would play every night from eight o’clock until two or three in the morning. Before we would go out, I would tell Sabrina I was going to Bob’s room to talk about strategy. I’d go over there and suit up with Thor.

Now, as a young blackjack player I had to have a story as to why I had so much money to gamble with. I always had my guitar, and my story was that I was a songwriter, and the reason they hadn’t heard of me was that I wrote commercials. I would bring my guitar down to the casino. There was a bar adjacent to the casino, and the waves would lap up on the sand. There was no wall. The bar was right on the beach.

I have pictures of Sabrina and me sitting there with the owner of the casino and his wife. I was playing guitar for them. They had no idea I was completely wired with this blackjack computer. I think back on that and wonder what would have happened if they had discovered this?

At the beginning of the trip, I lost and lost. In fact I had lost all the money we came with. I had gone down there with $40,000, and it was gone. The casino owner offered to loan me $5,000.

Bob and I called back home and said, “These guys also own a casino in Sicily. Check it out and see if you can find out if they have any reputation for cheating or anything bad.” The word came back that they did have a bad reputation. Our connections told us we really didn’t want to play there. For some reason we decided to take the $5,000 anyway, and try to get our money back. I honestly can’t remember why.

It was the last day of our trip. I was flying out at five the next morning. I start winning, and then I won some more. As it got later there weren’t many other people in the casino, so they closed it down. This meant that Bob, who was always at the next table, was no longer there. I’m winning all this money back, and there is no one else in the casino.

There is the dealer, the pit boss, and the owner of the casino has taken a seat at the table on my left. The casino manager is sitting at the table also, and he’s on my right. Sabrina and I are sitting in the middle of the table between them, and I can’t lose a hand. I wanted to quit, but I thought, if I quit they were really going to be pissed. I remember being scared to quit. This is odd because I had been through a lot of things without being scared. But this scared me.

I ended up getting all my money back plus about $20,000. They knew about my morning flight, and about three a.m. I said, “Guys, I have to go.” They were very deliberate, but they were gentlemen about it. They slowly counted out my money and we were on our way with a big Phew. This was not what I imagined when I was learning to count Hi-Opt on the kitchen table.

RWM: Didn’t you once have a disguise where you became black?

Darryl: It was not my intention to look black. That’s just how it turned out. I wanted to look foreign. I was using skin tint, and a lot of people thought I was Mulatto.

I remember one play with the Mulatto look at the Cambridge Hotel in Atlantic City in 1983. A friend had loaned me a man’s full-length mink coat. Under it I was wearing a black three-piece suit. There was a beautiful young woman on my arm and I had a black doctor’s bag with $100,000 in cash in it.

I went in and dumped the cash out on the table and said, “I came to play.” I won $150,000 that session. At that time it was the largest session win of any of the professional blackjack players we knew. They gave me a limo to take us to New York. It was stocked with Dom Perignon, and we went to a Broadway show and had dinner, all paid by the casino.

I tried various disguises at different times. Sometimes they’d work and sometimes they wouldn’t. I remember once coming up with an elaborate disguise, and the first time I walked into a casino, the Holiday Inn on the Strip, I got the tap within 15 minutes.

RWM: Was that $150,000 your biggest session win ever?

Darryl: Yeah.

RWM: Do you remember your biggest loss?

Darryl: $80,000 at the MGM in Las Vegas, also with Thor. It was graveyard. Graveyard was always kind of surreal. Walking out of the MGM with nothing as the sun was rising.

RWM: How did Thor end?

Darryl: At some point the combined effect of our team and the other computer teams put heat on the move. They were looking for players with their feet flat on the floor. They realized people were tracking the shuffle with computers. It was time to move on.

I talked to Bob recently, and he said we won a million dollars with Thor. I don’t remember.

RWM: What did you do when Thor was over?

I fell in love, rented an apartment on Venice Beach, and pissed away my money. Then the Great Peace March happened.

RWM: What was that?

Darryl: The idea was that 5,000 people were going to walk from Los Angeles to Washington, DC, for peace. Madonna was doing commercials for this, and Sting was going to do the going away celebration at the Rose Bowl. There were portable shower trucks and laundry trucks. Club Med for peace.

I signed up for that. It wasn’t what it was advertised to be. Instead of Sting at the Rose Bowl, it was Mister Mister at City Hall. We walked anyway. We walked 15 miles through east LA, where my mother had told me never to go. We got to our first campground, which was a parking lot at Cal State LA. There were 1,200 people. One of the volunteers from the organizers came to me and said, “Stay vigilant. You guys are on your own.”

All these people had given up their lives to do this, and the whole thing was going to fall apart on the first day. We kept walking anyway. We got to 25 miles outside of Barstow, and the organizer flew in on a helicopter and told us to all go home. There was no more money. We looked at the helicopter and knew where the money had gone. People drifted away, but there were a few hundred left. Someone got up and said, “If you want to finish this meet tomorrow morning at the kitchen truck.”

We decided to go for it, and people did what they could to contribute. People who knew how to remove distributor caps did so on major support vehicles so they wouldn’t be repossessed. The people who could cook did that. The musicians formed a band. We started performing as we went across the country. We raised money for the marchers. We performed at rallies, at clubs, at benefits.

We walked into Washington on schedule eight months later. One of my distinct memories was marching down the Las Vegas Strip with my guitar around my neck. I just looked at all those casinos I had been thrown out of months earlier.

The next year I did a walk from Leningrad to Moscow. Our band played in the first outdoor rock concert in the history of the Soviet Union. We played in a show with James Taylor, Bonnie Rait, and Santana.

RWM: Did you play blackjack while you were in Russia?

Darryl: I didn’t play any blackjack in 1986. There was no blackjack in Russia at that time. Rock and roll was still illegal at that time.

I did go back to Russia to play blackjack later. On the peace march I met a Lithuanian cameraman. I trained him to count cards, and he went to Russia with me. It was the Wild West there. This was maybe 1993.

Vlad was at a bar in the casino and the guy next to him turned and said, “You’re going to give me all your money.” He said, “What do you mean? There are pit bosses right over there.” The guy said, “The pit bosses are with me. You’re going to give me all your money.”

Vlad pauses and the guy turns his back, and my friend takes off running. He hit the door and kept going. We did not stop our trip at that point. We kept playing. It took a little morning chase through the streets of Moscow by the Russian Mafia to actually convince us to leave.

RWM: How did that happen?

Darryl: I’m still a little unclear on the details. Maybe they wanted to rob me. I had finished my play at a casino late one night. I dropped my Russian girlfriend off at her apartment. I came back to the taxi, and the taxi driver said, “Who are those guys?” I said, “What guys?” He said, “They came and asked me about you. They’re following us.”

It was about five in the morning and I looked back and I couldn’t see them. I said, “Lose them.” He drove on and he said, “I can’t lose them. They’re good drivers.” I said, “Who are they?” He said, “The Russian Mafia.” I said, “Well, drive faster. Go to the embassy, or the police station.” He said, “You don’t understand.”

He was going faster and faster, and they were going faster. I put my money under the seat. At some point my driver stopped and they pulled up along side us, about ten feet away. They started to talk in Russian. At some point I heard my driver say, “Please, I don’t want any trouble with my family.” They talked some more and my driver turned to me and said, “They just want to talk to you.”

It was a small sedan with four big, burly guys. One of them got out and started over to my car. Just as he was reaching for the handle of my taxi I screamed at the driver, “GO!” Somehow the driver found it in himself to put his foot on the gas and we were off again. These taxis were old cars that seemed to be held together by wire and glue. We’re going up to 90 miles an hour, I’m guessing, through the streets of Moscow.

At one point we reached a big intersection and another car was coming right at us head on. There were screeching tires and everyone came to a stop in the middle of this big intersection. There were three cars; me in a taxi, the Russian Mafia, and a police car. We’re all at a stop sort of facing each other. I thought, “Whew, we made it.” I just blinked, and the police car was gone. They just took off.

We were back on the road and back to this 90 mile an hour chase. At some point I said, “Go back to the casino.” He drove to the casino, and either they didn’t want to do their dirty work near the casino, or maybe by then it was getting light and there were too many people out. I don’t know, but they left when we got to the casino. I really didn’t feel all that secure in asking the casino for a ride back to my place. That was the last time I played in Russia.

RWM: In retrospect, do you think you did a lot of dangerous things in your blackjack career?

Darryl: At the time I was very focused and I wanted to be good at what I did. I did my job, and I didn’t really consider that it was dangerous. Looking back I see where over and over I made these odd decisions that really didn’t have anything to do with my safety or my welfare, or anybody’s welfare really. They had to do with—this would make a good story.

RWM: Or this would make me some money?

Darryl: There was some of that I suppose, but not in the way you’d think. It was more of a workmanlike attitude of getting the job done. If it was about the money, I might have saved some of it.

RWM: I heard about a trip you made to Sri Lanka. What made you go there?

Darryl: We had tentacles around the globe and we would hear about games. At that point I was pretty steamy in Nevada and I was hard to disguise. We ended up playing in a lot of far away obscure places. We had heard that Sri Lanka had a significant advantage off the top. I forget the exact rules, but it probably involved early surrender and 21 pushes versus blackjack. It had all the standard rules, plus a few things that were pretty weird. It had maybe ½ to 1% advantage off the top. I went with Art, and it is such an odd place, even for a globetrotting blackjack player.

On the way to Colombo in the plane I opened a tourist book about Sri Lanka. It said in the book that one of the odd things about the people in Colombo is that when they want to say “yes” they shake their head from side to side, the way we say “no.” I thought that was the strangest thing, so I turned to the guy next to me on the plane. He was from Colombo, and I said, “It says in here that when you want to say yes, you shake your head from side to side. Is that true?” He shook his head from side to side, and I thought, “Of course not. That’s ridiculous.” It took me a while to catch on. I went up to a taxi and said, “Can you take me to the casino?” He would shake his head from side to side and I looked for another taxi. An elevator would open, “Are you going up?” They would shake their head from side to side. “Okay, I’ll get the next one.”

When we first got there it was Buddha’s birthday, so all the casinos were closed for two days. We decided to have a little vacation in Kandy, which is one of the spiritual centers for Buddhists. It was a beautiful country but at that time there were two civil wars going on. The Tamil Tigers, who invented suicide bombings, were battling from the north.

It was fierce and ugly, and bodies were turning up every day. At the Colombo Hilton where we were staying, they had about 15% occupancy. There is a picture of me at the Colombo Hilton pool and I am the only person there. I’m reading a newspaper, and the headline says, “Parties to Replace Slain Candidates.” We would read the paper every morning just to check if the place we ate lunch was still open—that it hadn’t been bombed.

RWM: Were there many people in the casino?

Darryl: The casinos were very small, maybe three or four tables at the most. There were other players, but not many.

When we started playing I won a bit and got the tap on the shoulder. The casino owner invited me to the back room. The owner was part Dutch and part Indian. He spoke English very well. He accused me of being a professional blackjack player. In his mind that was the equivalent of cheating. He kept repeating in a slow, Mafia Don kind of way, “It’s a very dangerous game you’re playing.”

He was basically telling me to leave without my chips. I had between $5,000 and $10,000. My attitude was, “No way. I’m not leaving without the chips.” Then he wanted me to give up half the chips. Again, I was, “No way.” We had this 45-minute conversation and I ended up giving him $200 and keeping the rest. I declined his offer of a ride back to the hotel. I got on the phone and called Art. I let him know the situation I was in. He said, “Do you think they might kill you?” I said, ”I’m not sure.” He sent a taxi. We got on the next plane out of there and never went back.

On the way to Sri Lanka we were in Korea. Somehow we ended up playing blackjack at the Disabled American Veterans Club. There were no disabled people, no Americans, and no veterans. As I understand it, this place was a front for a Yakuza-run casino and meeting place.

Art and I went in there and lost, and lost, and lost. It was a $300 limit, and we got stuck $20,000. We had a video camera with us. It’s the only time I’ve ever had video inside a casino, and it was just Art and me in there. I was on one table and he was on another. We lost all this money and then went to Sri Lanka. After Sri Lanka we came back to Korea to win our money back. One day we just could not lose a hand. We started cashing out a few thousand at a time. That worked for a while, but then all of a sudden they didn’t have any more money. They owed us maybe $14,000. Art and I left the casino being owed this money.

RWM: Did you take the chips, or a check? Or was it, “We’ll pay you the next time we see you.”

Darryl: It was exactly that—we’ll pay you next time. What were we going to do? We insisted on the money; they insisted they didn’t have it. Art and I had a reverse auction to decide who would stay and collect the money from the Yakuza. It started off with Art saying he would stay for $1,000 per day plus expenses. This would be paid by our bankroll. I said I would stay for $500 per day plus expenses. I think it was bid down to me staying for $300 a day plus expenses.

RWM: It sounds like this was more about the inconvenience of staying in Korea for three days, than fear of the Yakuza.

Darryl: That’s right. I went back to the casino on Monday, and they gave some story about their bank and said I should come back on Wednesday. I went back on Wednesday, and this time it was, “Call us tomorrow.” I called on Thursday and they still didn’t have it.

I made a couple of trips down there. One of them ended with the casino manager grabbing me and ripping the buttons off my shirt. I was trying to be a bully as best I knew how, which is not very well. My job was to collect the money they owed us. Fair is square, right?

I came back the next day, and was asking for their superiors. They wanted to deal with me in the front room and have me go away. I wasn’t going to let that happen. I started opening doors. I ended up bursting into some Yakuza meeting. There were all these Japanese guys sitting around a conference table and I started talking in English about how I wanted my money. I did leave there alive that day.

A couple of days passed, and they called me and said, “We’ve got your money. Come on down.” I’m like, Right, you’ve got my money and you’re just going to give it to me. So before I went down there I called another blackjack player named Jake. He was the only guy I knew in Seoul at the time. I told him what was going on and that I was a little worried. There was no explaining the casino’s apparent change of heart. I told Jake, “If you don’t hear from me in an hour, do whatever you can. Call the embassy, or the police, or whatever.”

I went out and got in a taxi. I got into one of those remarkable Seoul traffic jams. They have billions of these tiny little cars. They have wide streets with no lanes, and everyone is trying to go their own way. Everybody uses their horns.

We’re sitting for 10, 15, 20 minutes in this sea of cars. It occurred to me that I wouldn’t be able to call Jake within the hour. In the distance I saw this barbed wire and a chain-link fence. It was an American Army base. I told the driver, “I’ll be right back.” I got out of the cab and maneuvered through all the other stopped cars, and I found a little hole in the chain-link fence where the guard was standing.

I said, “I’m an American citizen, and this is an emergency. I need to make a phone call.” He said, “Right this way, sir.” I remember that was one of the first times in my life where—I had always been the young person dealing with adults, but here was this 19-year-old soldier treating me like the American businessman. I got to the phone and called Jake. I said, “Give me another hour.” He said, “Okay, I was starting to wonder.” The end of the story was, I got there and they gave me all the money.

RWM: One of the people I interviewed said, “How did we ever play blackjack before there were cell phones?”

Darryl: Right. How did we live before cell phones? A lot of people got lost going from one play to another. There are some interesting stories about that. There was a guy who didn’t know about the Sahara in Vegas, but did know about the Sahara in Lake Tahoe. He got the signal to go to the backup club, which was the Sahara, and he went to the airport and hopped a plane for Tahoe.

RWM: You’ve told me now about being chased by the Russian mob, sitting in St. Martin with the Sicilian Mafia, and collecting money from the Japanese Yakuza. At some point did you ever stop and say, “This is dangerous, and I don’t want to do this anymore.” Or are you still ready to hop a plane and play in Iraq?

Darryl: There are casinos in Iraq? ♠

Posted on Leave a comment

How to Stack a Deck

How to Stack a Deck

by Sam Case

(From Blackjack Forum Vol. III #1, March 1983)
© 1983 Blackjack Forum

Stacking a deck requires two stages — location and placement. Location is just finding the cards, placement is putting them where you want them in the stacked deck. Whenever the exact order of the deck is prearranged, the location step can be omitted. One example of a prearranged deck is a fresh one.

All players know that a deck comes in a standard order. From the front to the back, according to suit, they read A to K, A to K, then K to A, K to A. Many players know that the center clump, which consists of 8 tens, can be shuffled to the bottom, and kept out of play (see the last issue of Blackjack Forum). Few players realize that a dealer starting with a fresh deck could stack himself a blackjack on the first round, even with his eyes closed.

Try this yourself. Get a deck in it’s new order. You will need that ace that’s sitting on top and the clump of tens in the center. Cut the top half of the deck to the right. Be sure to cut near the center so you are left with a paint (face card) on the left hand half.

We’ll set up a dealer blackjack against a head-on player. Riffle shuffle the cards together evenly, except make sure that the top card from the right hand packet falls directly under the last card from the left.

Square up the deck. Now we have a ten on top, an ace under it, then the rest of the deck.

Now shuffle as I described last time to preserve the top two cards of the stack, since most dealers do three riffles and only two are needed to do the dirty work. This is basically a “stalling” shuffle.

Now it’s stack time. Cut the top half to the right, and riffle evenly except hold back the top three cards on the left side, and the top two on the right. Do this slowly and carefully. Drop one from the right, one from the left, the last from the right, and finally the last two from the left. (Forget the cut for now.)

Square up, burn a card, and deal to an imaginary player. Shame on you! By hiding your ace you didn’t even give the player a chance to insure!

If there had been seven people at the table, the shuffle would be similar. The first two shuffles would be the same. On the third shuffle, hold back fifteen instead of three cards. Drop one from the right, seven from the left, one from the right, then eight from the left. Deal out the deck to a full table, and you still have your blackjack. This would take a more skilled cheat.

You may be wondering what would happen if a player joined the table after the dealer had stacked the deck. Well, using the old standby, the second deal, the hand can be saved.

Now, what about the next shuffle? Well, the dealer would scoop up the cards carefully, making sure that the blackjack goes just under the burn card. He would first bring the blackjack to the top in the first two shuffles, then stack on the third. Thus, he could keep getting the same blackjack over and over.

Often, if you’re being cheated by a dealer who keeps getting first round blackjacks, this is what is happening. Until you catch on, it will seem as if lady luck is out to lunch and it will cost you time and money. You could spot this quickly if you remember the Sam Case First-Round Blackjack Rule: Any time a dealer gets a first round blackjack, memorize the suits of the ace and the ten. Walk if the dealer gets that pair again.

Getting back to the cut, which is supposed to be your insurance against a stacked deck, a good cheat can nullify your cut, but this will have to be covered in detail in a future article. For the simplest method of nullifying a cut see my article on “Crimps” in Blackjack Forum Vol. II #3.

While I’m on the subject of memorizing an occasional card or two, I’ll let you know the simplest method to prevent a dealer from pulling a turn-over on you. That’s when you’re playing, and during the first half of the deck you’ve seen a pile of low cards. You push out a big bet, but as soon as you glance away the dealer flips the deck over.

You start playing against those discards — the same low cards that already brought you so much grief. You’re at a big disadvantage, but continue to bet more and more since your count keeps climbing higher. Very bad. But suppose you took the trouble to memorize just one card on every round. If one of those cards flips out a second time before a shuffle, you’ll know it and save yourself some money. If you don’t trust your card memory, try reading “Perfecting Your Card Memory”, available from the Gambler’s Book Club.

Final words: Be very suspicious of a dealer who watches his hands while shuffling. There’s no reason for that. Touch is enough. A dealer who watches the shuffle is probably either a rookie or a cheat. Experienced, honest dealers usually spend their shuffling time making eye contact with customers to encourage tips. That’s the way it should be. ♠

Posted on Leave a comment

Stuck in Aruba with Darryl Purpose

Stuck in Aruba with Darryl Purpose

By Nick Alexander
(From Blackjack Forum Volume XXIV #1, Winter 2004/05)
© Blackjack Forum 2005

[Nick Alexander is a professional blackjack player who retires every three or four years. He currently lives a life of leisure in the south of France. After reading the last issue of Blackjack Forum he is considering coming out of retirement to tour South America. Darryl Purpose is an inductee into the Blackjack Hall of Fame. See also Richard W. Munchkin’s Interview with Darryl Purpose, and www.darrylpurpose.com.]

I retired from blackjack for the first time in 1983 after a trip to Europe with my friend Darryl. But then in 1985 I was reading Gambling Times magazine, and an ad caught my eye. A new casino was opening in Aruba, and they were going to offer single-deck. I thought this might not lead to much since many other card counters would surely see the ad. But it was worth investigating when combined with a second piece of information, which was that a casino in Curacao was offering early surrender. I have no memory of how I got that info, but I thought this definitely called for a Caribbean trip.

Back in the early ‘80s the blackjack world was very small. All the teams knew each other and would socialize at parties that consisted of 25 guys who stood around and talked about nothing but blackjack. You can see why it was difficult to ever get women to attend. At one point we made an effort to invite more women to the parties, and instituted a rule against discussion of blackjack or casinos. A few women came, but the rules were soon broken. As discussion turned to what a sweatshop the Hacienda was and, “I had a true +9 and the dealer hit her 16 with a …,” the women retired to the kitchen and talked about what nerds we all were.

I bring this up because I needed someone to go to the islands with me. My old team had gone off in different directions, but I had met Darryl at one of these parties. I was one of the investors in his Thor bankroll, and had gone to Europe with him on his first attempts at using Thor. (Note—when traveling in foreign countries with a blackjack computer, it’s a good idea to have someone with you.) I called Darryl, and gave him my pitch. I didn’t want to get involved in any long bankroll, and I had these potentially great games. Darryl’s response was exactly what I wanted to hear, “Let’s go play, and we’ll split up the money at the end of the trip. Of course if we lose we’ll have to play to make up the loss.” Great! How could we lose? Early surrender and a single-deck game with a bunch of island rubes.

I made arrangements and called Darryl. “Okay, we leave three weeks from Thursday.” “Three weeks? Why so far off?” I explained, “Well I needed 21-day advance notice for the tickets. These tickets are $540, but if we go sooner the tickets are over $1,000.” He said, “We’re going to play some games that may be worth $1,000 per hour, and you want to save $500 on airfare. Let’s leave tomorrow.”

This was my first indication that playing for this team would be much different from my last. You see, on my old team we pinched every penny. We played absolutely no cover plays, no cover bets, and no tipping. No expenses were covered by the team—none, zip. We all lived in Vegas, and were required to play 12 hours per week. If you had trouble getting your hours in Vegas because of heat, and you wanted to go to Reno, you paid your own plane fare and hotel bills. If the team had to pay for something, you’d better check the price at five different stores and make sure you got it on sale, and with a coupon. I admit that I called Darryl in the first place because I knew his team covered expenses, but this seemed quite extravagant. We left the next day.

I had managed to find a deal at the Concorde Hotel and Casino in Curacao. We each put up $20,000 front money. This gave us RFB and they would rebate some of our airfare based on our action. The only problem was that this was not the casino with early surrender, and their game sucked. We did put in some play to ensure our comp, but then went off looking for the other game. We found the game just as advertised. The casino opened at 1 p.m. and closed at 4 a.m. They had very few tables, but were willing to give us a private game with a limit of $500. We decided to each play an eight-hour shift. I would play from one to nine. Darryl would come in about eight, and we would play together for an hour. Then I would leave and he would continue until closing. Our plan was to do this for a week, or until we won so much they cried uncle. Then we would move on to Aruba, and attack that single-deck.

The next morning I went down to the pool for breakfast and a swim. One of the things I quickly realized was that Darryl and I didn’t fit with the normal Curacao crowd. We were lacking blue hair and liver spots. But that morning I met what may have been the only woman on the island close to my age. We spent the morning talking, but then I had to excuse myself to get ready for the casino opening.

I was the first customer in the door at one o’clock. “Ah, sir. We have a table ready for you.” Indeed, there was a table with six decks of cards already in the shoe. This wasn’t my first time at the parade. “Why are the cards already in the shoe?” “We have them all ready so you can play.” I said, “That is very bad luck. Would you mind bringing new decks, and spreading them so I can see all the cards?” “No problem.” They brought new decks, and I satisfied myself that all the cards were in the shoe. By the time Darryl got there seven hours later I was stuck about $12,000. We played together for about an hour and agreed to meet for lunch the next day.

The next day at lunch I filled him in on the girl I had met. I explained that we had really hit it off. She was bright and witty. He asked me what happened. I said, “Nothing happened. It got close to one o’clock, so I went to the casino and lost $12,000.” He looked quite angry, “Damn it. We have rules on this team. If you have a choice between playing blackjack and meeting your future wife, forget about the casino.” Now he tells me.

At 1 o’clock I went in to start my shift. I did much better that day; I lost only $8,000. Darryl came in at 8:00 and joined my table. This was always the best hour of the day because it is much more fun to play with a friend at the table. We were playing along when I noticed the casino manager talking to someone. Oops! It was the casino manager of the Concorde. He was not happy to see us playing at the Holiday when we were staying on a comp at the Concorde. I think he was also comparing notes with this casino manager since they weren’t used to players who bet three hands of the limit. “You don’t like my casino?” “Oh, we like it just fine. We thought we would try this place for a change.” They went back to confer, and I left Darryl to face the heat alone. Later I went to the casino manager of the Holiday and told him, “You know, you really have a much nicer casino than the Concorde, and we would be willing to move over here… RFB of course.” The next morning we packed our bags, and moved to the Holiday.

My routine was to go swimming or scuba diving in the morning, and get beat up in the casino in the afternoon. One morning I was out at the pool reading a book. A woman came over and said, “Oh, the sun is very dangerous here, and your skin is so white. You should get in the shade. Is this your first day here?” I said, “No, I’ve been here a week.” I guess sun block wasn’t as well known back then.

That morning I went scuba diving. When I entered the dive shop the guy working there was getting my gear. He stopped and looked at me. “You look really familiar. Are you from Vegas?” Jeez, please don’t tell me he has affiliations with the casino. Fortunately he didn’t. That morning I had the best dive of my life. Off Curacao the water was so clear that visibility was 200 yards. I was marveling at all the colorful fish when suddenly a giant sea turtle went cruising by with our dive master holding on to his back. It was his personal underwater sea scooter.

I wish I could tell you we crushed this little Banana Republic casino; that the counts would rise, and the blackjacks would fall, and we raked in the money. But the truth is that even with a game that offered an advantage off the top and 80% penetration, we couldn’t win. After ten days we had to move on to Aruba stuck $37,000. (I lost a little over $19,000, and Darryl lost about $17,500, which proves once again who the better player is.)

Aruba also had a Concorde Casino, and a Holiday Casino. We picked the Holiday since it had been so much better in Curacao. I sat down to play, and a boss came walking through the pit and did a 180 to turn and stare at me. “Hey, aren’t you from Vegas?” I hadn’t played blackjack in a year and a half, I’m 17 miles off the coast of Venezuela, and I’m still getting heat. So much for that casino.

Darryl and I set out to scout the island. We found the new casino. They had been open a week, but no single-deck. They had never heard of the ad, and had never had single-deck. We headed home, our tails between our legs. A few months later we heard the news that made us sick. There was another small casino that we didn’t find. They had put in single deck with early surrender. The counter that found it only spread 1-2, and the casino owner thought no game could be beat with that small spread. The player won $300,000 before the casino manager cried uncle. Note—if you’re going to scout a country, make sure you really scout it.

Remember that little clause in my contract? “Unless we lose.” We came home to find that one of Darryl’s blackjack teammates had been pulled up with a computer in his shoes after losing $200,000. After backrooming him, calling Gaming, and confiscating his money, they sent him out at 2:00 in the morning … barefoot. I was now on a bank stuck $240,000. So much for retirement. ♠

Posted on 2 Comments

Dangerous Shoes

Dangerous Shoes: Casino Cheating at Blackjack

by Steve Forte

(From Blackjack Forum Vol. XI #1, March 1991)
© 1991 Blackjack Forum

Over the years, between letters, phone calls and personal meetings, I’ve talked with hundreds of concerned players who suspect they were cheated in card, dice and gambling games of all kinds. When the game is blackjack, one of the most commonly asked questions is: “Can I be cheated when the cards are dealt from a shoe?” As you may suspect, the answer is a definite yes. What you may not suspect is that you can be cheated easier and more deceptively in shoe games than in games where cards are dealt from the hand.

One reason shoe games can be so dangerous is that everyone knows you can be cheated in hand held games, and bad luck naturally invites suspicion. You also have many players who believe you can’t be cheated in shoe games. With such a false sense of security, these players could lose entire bankrolls against some of the following techniques, and never suspect foul play.

Most of what you are about to read has never been “tipped” in print. There are many ways to cheat players in shoe games, many more than most players would ever imagine. They range from rank moves like the “Selective Upcard,” a technique discussed in the December 1988 issue of Blackjack Forum (p. 8) to the sophisticated “Set Up Games” where the dealer, boss and players all work together to “take off” (cheat) one or more players.

This article addresses three of the most common methods of cheating players with a shoe. They are the “Short Shoe,” “The Anchor,” and “Crooked Dealing Shoes.” Although these techniques are somewhat known, I think you’ll see that a little knowledge can sometimes be a liability!

Cheating at Blackjack: Short Shoes

Removing high cards from the shoe is the easiest way to cheat players at a multi-deck blackjack game and requires no skill or brains. Removing 8-10 ten-valued cards and 2-4 aces from a four-deck shoe before the game starts will effectively increase an operator’s advantage. If you are consistently left hanging with a positive count at the cut card, you may be bucking a short shoe.

The following story shows one way to “short” shoes after the game starts out on the square.

I know a winning player who frequented this private game. The operator dealt three out of four decks with Vegas rules. The player was hip to the short shoe so he insisted that whenever he played, four new decks were opened and spread face up for inspection.

The player always played two hands and generally played alone. The game was dealt under the guise of a challenge proposition. The operators boasted that no one could beat the 4-deck shoe with a card counting strategy. They actually knew better, but this was all part of the hustle.

The ploy was simple. The dealer simply waited until a rich round showed up (i.e. two twenties and a blackjack). The complete round would be picked up, apparently placed into the discard rack, but actually “held out” (palmed). The dealer would reach under the table for a tissue, and during this action would drop the cards into the waste basket. The dealer would then wipe his glasses and throw the tissue away, conveniently on top of the trashed cards.

The move would be repeated once again, and in no time at all the deck would be significantly short. Since the player was put to sleep with the initial inspection of the cards, he never caught on. If the player woke up and demanded a count down, you can bet that all four decks would have accidentally been spilled all over the table and the floor, and, of course, some cards would have ended up in the trash can.

There are also ways to short shoes without actually removing cards. There have been some sophisticated shuffling procedures designed to “slug” or keep groups of high cards together. These slugs are then cut out of play by an accomplice posing as a player, or the dealer just gambles with a legitimate player cut. This turns out to be no gamble at all as some rules allow no less than one deck to be cut from either top or bottom. [Note from Arnold Snyder: For an example of this kind of cheating, see Stickin’ It to the Safari Club.]

Even without this rule, influencing the cut is not a problem. Some players always cut deep, some thin, some always cut center. The dealer just picks his spots. A hustler once told me, “When I need a center cut to hit a brief (crimp) or cut a slug out of play, I give the deck to the player paying the least attention to the game. When I catch them off guard they cut center about 8 or 9 times out of 10.”

[Note from Arnold Snyder: Since the writing of this article, I have encountered short shoes in two Las Vegas casinos. If you see high counts shoe after shoe but the high cards never come out, don’t imagine that a short shoe is impossible, even in a casino on the Las Vegas Strip.]

The Anchor–Another Method of Cheating at Blackjack

The “anchor” was a ploy developed quite some time ago. It was used in single-deck games as a subtle substitute for the second deal.

The “anchor man” would sit on third base. He would receive signals from the dealer to hit or stand depending on the top card and the dealer’s total. This information was obtained through the use of marked cards or various peeking techniques.

If the top card would bust the dealer, the anchor would be signaled to hit; if the top card would help the dealer, he would be signaled to stand. Sometimes the anchor would even hit a three or four card standing hand. When the hand eventually busted, the cards would be picked up quickly, making it difficult for anyone to spot the unusual play.

Anchors allow all cards to be dealt slowly and cleanly, which naturally puts all players at ease. A “double anchor” is also sometimes employed, using two players to help take off cards for the dealer. Needless to say, either way the frequency of dealer busts decreases dramatically.

The “anchor” and “double anchor” can and have been used in shoe games. Typically sand, trims, blockout or any type of marked cards that can easily be read across the table are used. The shoe is legitimate, and although the cards are marked, these games are always dealt face up making it impossible for anyone to “burn” (watch closely) the back of any card for any length of time. With the cards dealt face up, some discretion must be used by the anchors in their playing decisions.

One variation, known as the “early anchor,” is subtle, and designed to take dead aim at an individual player. Instead of playing third base, the anchor sits immediately before the targeted player. His goal is to take off good double down cards and put the targeted player on as many stiffs as possible.

For example, the dealer shows a ten, the anchor has 13 and the targeted player has a total of nine. If the top card is read (remember the cards are marked) to be a 4, 5 or 6, the anchor stands. The player, after hitting once, will be stiff against a dealer ten, not a lucrative situation.

Or, the player may have nine, ten or eleven vs. a dealer low card, and is obviously going to double down. If the top card is read to be ten valued, the early anchor will hit almost any hand, taking off at least one winning card from the player. This can be very frustrating. The early anchor often plays two hands, allowing the greatest chance to alter the hit card distribution favorably for the dealer, or unfavorably, if you happen to be the targeted player.

Crooked Dealing Shoes at Blackjack

There are a number of crooked dealing shoes in existence today. The most common is the “Prism and Second Dealing Shoe.” The prism is the peeking gaff that allows the dealer to see an image of the top card. It is a semi-transparent solid piece of plastic that works a bit like a periscope. It hides behind the upper part of the face plate (front of the shoe) and to the uninformed simply appears to be part of the plastic casing. When the top card is pushed back slightly, it gets wedged between the prism and face plate. In this position not only can the top card be peeked but the second card can be dealt.

It’s ironic, but when dealing shoes first became popular many players thought that blackjack’s two most dangerous cheaters’ moves, the peek and the second deal, would finally be eliminated. What really happened is that the second deal, a prized gambler’s move taking hundreds of hours of practice to master, became easier to deal and more deceptive to boot. And the peek became automatic and almost foolproof without any of the unnatural moves that tip off handheld peeks.

In many ways, crooked dealing shoes became more dangerous to players’ bankrolls than skilled card mechanics. Gaffed shoes are sold in various parts of the country, usually costing from $1200-$1500. They are frequently sold with a “front” (legitimate dealing shoe that perfectly matches the gaffed shoe) for an additional $100. Most of these shoes come with various locking mechanisms. With the shoe “locked up,” second dealing and peeking become impossible and the shoe could be safely passed out for inspection.

An inferior variation of this shoe has the prism replaced by a “shiner” (mirror). Each time the top card is pushed back into the second dealing position a small mirror mechanically pops out from behind the face plate to peek the top card.

The most sophisticated “Peek” and “Two Shoe” I ever saw was made of a black shiny plastic. There were no extra or moving parts, just a front, back, two sides and the bottom. The optics necessary to peek the top card were molded right into the face plate. In peek position only 1/8 of the card’s index was readable. This means you could be standing on top of the dealer and probably never suspect the peek.

The decks had to be aggressively shuffled, putting a natural wave in all cards. This allowed each top card to hug the plastic and contact the optical part of the face plate. To deal this shoe expertly required tremendous practice, and you couldn’t buy the shoe for less than $10,000. I mention this particular shoe only to show how much thought and energy can go into perfecting these gaffs.

When you remove the prism or peeking mechanism from one of these gaffed shoes, you end up with a plastic box that really looks like a legitimate, ungaffed shoe from all angles. The only visible discrepancy is the slightly longer face plate which goes unnoticed by all except those in the know. This extra room allows the top card to be pushed back for the second deal. Since a second dealing shoe is of no value unless the top card is known, other means must be used to get this information.

I know of spots where they deal “rough and smooth” from these shoes. Rough and smooth are marked cards that can be distinguished by feel alone. Some card manufacturers use more than one finish on the same back design. The high cards (9-A’s) are taken from decks with a rough and grainy finish, while the low cards (2-8’s) are taken from the smooth finished backs, and both are sorted together to make complete four-deck shoes.

With the dealer’s left hand resting naturally on the shoe and top card, the different back finishes are easily discernible. The dealer can now read every card without any unnatural moves, and use the second deal when needed to go for the money. If you happen to be in this game looking for the prism or watching the dealer’s eyes, trying to detect him glancing in the shoe’s direction for the peek, you would have to wait a long time.

In closing, let me point out that some of the techniques discussed can also be found in multi-deck games where the shoe is not used. Dealing the cards from a spread on the table is a very common practice in private games.

Secondly, if you do happen to run into one of these techniques, use your head, dummy up, and find another game. In some spots, if you let your suspicions be heard, you can expect to be escorted to the street. Hopefully, there will be no traffic at the time.

Finally, we’ve only touched a few bases. There are a number of other ways you can be cheated in shoe games. There are also other variations on the short shoe and the anchor. I’ve simply described the most common techniques. Hopefully this information will be worth something to you in dollars and cents, somewhere down the road. ♠

Posted on Leave a comment

Interview with Al Francesco

Interview with Al Francesco

by Richard W. Munchkin

(From Blackjack Forum Volume XXII #2, Summer 2002)
© 2002 RWM

[Note from A.S.–Richard Munchkin is the author of Gambling Wizards: Conversations with the World’s Greatest Gamblers, one of my favorites on professional gambling and gamblers. Since the time of this interview, Richard Munchkin has been elected into the Blackjack Hall of Fame.]

[Note from RWM: One of the seven inaugural members elected into the Blackjack Hall of Fame by professional gamblers was Al Francesco.

In his interview for my book, Gambling Wizards (Huntington Press, 2002), the great professional gambler Billy Walters told me, “If you’re committed to being a professional gambler, and you want to be the best you can be, you spend every waking moment trying to figure out a way to beat the game.” No one exemplifies this more than Al Francesco.

This is the professional gambler who invented the Big Player blackjack team concept and taught Ken Uston how to count cards. He ran the first computer blackjack team, teaching players how to operate hidden microcomputers with their toes. He wasn’t content counting cards at a time when the casinos didn’t think blackjack could be beaten. He was a professional gambler who wanted bigger edges, and moves that the casinos hadn’t seen before.

Many people have heard of playing “warps,” but how many people could do what Al did in Korea? He spotted a dealer inadvertently bending the cards, immediately started signaling his partner at the table, and within eight hours won over $50,000 in a club with a $100 limit! That is what separates the Blackjack Hall-of-Famer from the mere professional gambler.]

Start of a Career in Blackjack

RWM: When did you start playing blackjack?

Al Francesco: Ed Thorp gets the credit for that. I started playing in 1963 shortly after I read his book. It took me about five weeks to learn his system, the Ten Count. You had to count backwards with a ratio of small cards to large cards. You started with 36/16, and if you saw one of each, a ten and a non-ten, you went to 35/15. You had to divide one into the other. That ratio would then determine when to hit or stand, and your bet size. I remember going up to Reno and playing with it, but it was a very difficult system.

RWM: Did you meet Thorp back then?

Al Francesco: No, Thorp wasn’t a professional gambler and really didn’t play much. He tried to play and got cheated all the time. He wasn’t able to spot the cheating, because he didn’t have the background I did. He had someone with him to see why he wasn’t winning, and that person witnessed all the cheating.

RWM: Were you a gambler before that? Did you go to Vegas just to play?

Al Francesco: I had never been to Vegas or Reno. I had just moved to California when I read the book. Earlier in my life when I was 19 to 21, I gambled in my hometown, Gary, Indiana. I used to play some games like Greek Rummy and some other games that aren’t popular now. I guess I was good at it, or else my opponents were extremely bad. I won just about every time I played. It was small stakes. I made about $5,000 a year, but back then that is what I would have made at a regular job. So I guess I became a professional gambler back then.

RWM: So you were used to looking for an edge?

Al Francesco: I have always looked for an edge. I probably only played without an edge twice in my life. At least, every other time I thought I had an edge. I remember those two times I played without an edge very clearly. I remember the thrill, which is totally different than when you’re gambling for a living.

RWM: What were you playing?

Al Francesco: I was in a crap game. I was making $10 and $20 bets. It was a high. I lost $200 and ran out of money. I ran home to get some more, but by the time I got back the game had broken up. I probably saved the rest of the money I had. Maybe someone was doing something funny in the game. At that time just about any home game had something funny going on.

RWM: It was 1963 and you learned the Ten Count. What was it like counting cards back then?

Al Francesco: The first time I counted cards, I got a headache within twenty minutes. It was an extremely tough system. I thought I was ready for it, but I wasn’t. I went home and studied some more, and then when I went back I was ready and could keep up with any dealer. It was all single-deck at that time.

RWM: You started off betting small?

Al Francesco: Yes, I was betting from $5 to $25 and then started building a bankroll to the point where I was betting up to two hands of $200. They didn’t know the game was beatable at that time. I was varying my bet from $5 to two hands of $200. I was one of the first people that were really beating the game. I played to my heart’s content. I’d just play and play and play.

The Games Back Then

RWM: Did you have problems with them cheating you?

Al Francesco: Oh, that was the biggest problem. In 1963 I would catch dealer cheating six to eight times every single day. Most of it was at night. It seemed that all the cheaters worked night shift. I always made money during the day, but at night I got my clock cleaned numerous times. I spotted most of the cheating I think, but evidently there were some moves that were beyond me.

Back then blackjack dealers would switch their hole card. When they had a ten as an upcard, they had to check their hole card to see if they had a blackjack. If they had a stiff, when they were ready to play out their hand, they would switch the hole card as they were turning it over. The top card of the deck became their hole card and the original hole card went to the top of the deck. I was facing twenty over and over again. I didn’t know about that cheating move until years later.

The Cal Neva in North Lake Tahoe was notorious for cheating. Frank Sinatra owned a piece of the place at that time. I went in there because I wanted to see it first hand.

I went to the blackjack table and got ten silver dollars. I bet a dollar a hand and it took eleven hands to lose the $10. During that time I got the five of hearts three times in one deck. The dealer was rolling the deck on me, dealing seconds, every cheating move you could imagine. He was practicing on me at $1 a hand.

[In the ’60s the dealers would place the discards face-up on the bottom of the deck. A dealer who cheated would spot a combination of cards that guaranteed the player would lose, place them on the bottom, and then roll the deck over–inverting it. He would then deal the same cards that had been played on the hand before. This is how Al received the five of hearts three times in the same deck. A more thorough description of this cheating technique can be found in How to Detect Casino Cheating at Blackjack, by Bill Zender.]

I left the table and I walked over to a busy crap table. Right away I saw something funny going on. I never play the game, but I’m familiar with some cheating moves. I knew some guys back in Gary, Indiana who could switch dice, and I’d read a lot of books on how to spot cheating. I saw the croupier give the dice to the guy next to him. The guy picked up the dice, and put them back down. I knew that he had switched them.

Everybody at the table was betting the “do,” so I immediately bet the “don’t.” If I had been smart, I would have just bet the “don’t” and not paid any attention to the dice. But it was the first time I had ever seen anything like this in a casino. I couldn’t take my eyes off the guy, because I was so amazed.

Evidently there were some outside guys who were protecting the game, and they noticed that I was betting “don’t” and had my eyes on the guy switching dice. They got the message to me that I’d better leave. I knew I wasn’t welcome, and I got out of there. I probably won $300 but they didn’t like me having any part of it.

RWM: Did the casinos ever assault you?

Al Francesco: I got roughed up one time at Harvey’s. My brother, who is also a professional gambler, had told me about seeing a guy there get the hell beat out of him by security guards. Nobody did anything or said anything. They just assumed he had done something wrong.

About two weeks later I was in Harvey’s. They had barred me before and told me not to come back. I was just scouting the place, and they spotted me and took me upstairs to a security office. While we were going upstairs they were tripping me. They were trying to get me mad.

I didn’t do anything at all because of the story my brother told me. They hit me a couple of times, but nothing really bad. This was back in ’63 or ’64 and I had heard about people being found out in the desert, so I wasn’t going to take any chances.

The First Blackjack Team

RWM: Did you form a team right away?

Al Francesco: No. I played by myself, mostly in Reno and Tahoe. After a year and a half I started getting barred left and right. I was being hassled too much, so I quit playing. I stopped for about eight years, and then they introduced 4-deck games, and Lawrence Revere came out with the Advanced Point Count.

I learned that system and started playing blackjack again. I played for about a month, started getting heat again, and stopped playing. I knew that I had to come up with a better way to play. [Lawrence Revere wrote Playing Blackjack as a Business.]

RWM: Did you know Revere?

Al Francesco: Yes. We went to Mexico together on a vacation.

RWM: Were there casinos in Mexico at that time?

Al Francesco: No, we just did it to spend a few days together. It was a fun trip.

RWM: How did you know him?

Al Francesco: I called him up because I was using his system. He wanted to give me lessons, but as it turned out I played the game better than he did. He was a character. He would always take a card out of the deck without his students knowing it. The student would always end up with the wrong count. That way he could charge them for more lessons. He made more money off his students than he ever did off the casinos.

He played both sides, too. He would teach people how to play, and then he would go to the casinos and point out the people he had taught. We went to Panama together once and were arrested. I believe it was Noriega who arrested us. They picked us up and put us in jail. They didn’t speak English and we didn’t speak Spanish. They wouldn’t let us make any phone calls. The next day they let us go. They never did explain why they arrested us.

RWM: Did they keep any of your money?

Al Francesco: No. I didn’t have a lot of money on me, maybe $5,000.

RWM: How did you come up with the Big Player concept?

Al Francesco: I was in Lake Tahoe with my brother and sister and her husband. We had reservations for the Top of the Wheel in Harvey’s. We were killing time waiting for dinner, and my brother was playing blackjack. He was betting from $1 to $5 and he knew how to count.

I was standing behind him talking with my brother-in-law, and every time I noticed my brother make a $5 bet, I threw $100 on his hand. I just kept talking to my brother-in-law and let my brother play the hand. It looked like I couldn’t care less about what happened. If my brother went down to $1, I pulled all my money back. We did that for about thirty minutes and the pit boss loved it, because they didn’t see many hundred-dollar bettors at that time.

When it came time to leave, the pit boss ran outside the pit and tried to stop me from going. He wanted me to keep playing. They bought that hook, line, and sinker. I didn’t give it too much thought, and then when I was playing in that four-deck game, it came to me that this was the way to outsmart them.

I started recruiting people who were interested in blackjack. Some were people I played poker with. The first trip I was the big player and I had three teammates. We went to Las Vegas with $8,000 and I remember being in the Stardust betting three hands of $500 on an $8,000 bankroll. I didn’t know at the time that I was way over-betting. I got really lucky and in 45 minutes I won $8,000. We did that for about a year.

RWM: Wow, if you can double your bankroll every 45 minutes, you’re going to get rich quick. What year was this?

Al Francesco: It was 1971. I was sort of on a high at that point. After 45 minutes I signaled to my partners that the play was over. We had originally planned to play three hours, so they were kind of surprised. The pit boss asked me if I wanted lunch and he asked me my name. I gave him the name Frank Fisano. He asked what I did for a living, and I told him I was in real estate.

I had lunch, and when I came back out, the pit boss stopped me and said, “Hey Frank. I just did some checking on you. There is nobody in the San Francisco area with a real estate license named Frank Fisano.”

I said, “I never told you I had a real estate license. I told you I was in the real estate business. I buy and sell.” It was all bullshit, but he bought the story.

About fifteen years later I played at the Stardust again, only it was a hole-card play. We had dealer after dealer with the same weakness, exposing the hole card at first base. I must have played for 24 hours straight. We won about $48,000 and the same pit boss was still there in the pit. Of course he didn’t recognize me after all those years, but I remembered him.

The Team with Ken Uston

RWM: How did start get Ken Uston on your team?

Al Francesco: I was always looking for new people because with three counters the BP didn’t keep busy all the time. It looked like he was waiting for something. If he was betting big all the time, the act looked a lot better. You looked like a raving maniac. Eventually we had six counters and the concept got better. Then I met Ken Uston. We were dating the same girl. She told him he should meet me, so one day he called me up.

RWM: Did he know how to play at that time?

Al Francesco: No, he was not a winning player at that time. I taught him to count and he started off as a spotter. I had another guy who was one of my best friends that I was using as a BP. I found out he was ripping us off, so I had to get rid of him. I had to replace him and I replaced him with Ken Uston. [Al laughed.] I probably should have stayed with the guy who was stealing. He wouldn’t have written a book about it.

All the time Ken worked for me he broke even. All those trips we made, he didn’t win any money. I don’t think he was dishonest. I think he spent so much time trying to put on an act that he lost his edge. The dealers probably ripped him off.

RWM: Did you know he had plans to write a book?

Al Francesco: Oh no. I had no idea whatsoever. I didn’t know about the book until about a week before it hit the bookstores.

RWM: When the book hit the stands, the casinos already knew what you guys were doing, didn’t they?

Al Francesco: Not really. To be honest with you, I think Ken wanted to get caught on the last trip we made, because the book was coming out. We were playing at the Sands that particular time, and his publisher was there watching him play. Ken was putting on a big show for him. It was Ken’s play that ended it for us.

On any given trip there were 22 of us. We had three teams of seven–six counters and one Big Player–and myself as the 22nd person. I was in the background answering the phone in case things happened, and things did happen often enough.

The three teams would be in three different casinos. The Big Player would stay at the casino for three days but the counters would rotate casinos every day. That way the BP had a new set of counters each day. Just in case the casino started to put it together, the next day it would be totally new faces. This bought us more time. We got away with this for 3½ years.

RWM: What were the criteria for people who wanted to join the team?

Al Francesco: The first thing I did was teach them how to count down a deck with the Revere APC, and I would give them basic strategy. I told them to come back and I would test them when they could count down a deck in 30 seconds, and knew basic strategy. If they could pass that test, then I would teach them the rest. Then they had to improve their time to 20 seconds. But to start, if they could get it down in 30 seconds, I knew they were interested and had potential. If they didn’t put forth the effort or call me back, I didn’t worry about it because I had enough people that were interested. Most of my people came from other people on the team.

Incidentally, I taught a lot of women how to play. We had a lot of women on the team and that may be one of the reasons for our success. Women were not given credit for being able to play blackjack.

RWM: When I interviewed Cathy Hulbert for Gambling Wizards, she said that the casinos were not used to seeing young women bet $1,000 a hand and they became very suspicious.

Al Francesco: That’s right, but I just used them as spotters and the casinos never suspected them.

One time, Ken was playing downtown at the Fremont, and called a session off after 35 minutes because he was up $27,000. One of our BPs, named Bill, was in a casino that only had double decks. We normally didn’t play double decks. The counts didn’t stay hot very long, so you had to jump around too much. So I had six counters that wanted to play, and I sent them over to help Bill. I wanted to oversee it since there were thirteen of my people in there. That kept Bill busy. He was jumping all over the place. There would be three or four people giving him the hot signal at the same time.

I saw that Bill was losing and realized that he might run out of money. I walked through the casino and I put my hand on my crotch. Bill saw me and knew I meant he should meet me at the bathroom. I headed for the pay phone and acted like I was making a phone call. I had $15,000 in an envelope and he just knew what I was doing. I hung up the phone and left the envelope just as he walked up. He got the money and resumed play.

He saw someone giving him a hot signal at another table. He yelled at the pit boss, “Make three bets over there for me.” He gave the boss some money to do it, and then he saw another hand go up, so he said, “Make three more bets over there for me. What have I got over there?” The boss said, “You have a 15, a 16 and a 20.” Bill said, “Stand, stand, stand.” He could see the dealer’s upcard on that table. Then he yells, “Make three bets over there for me,” pointing at another table, “Three more over there.”

It was like watching an orchestra leader. The bosses were running all over the casino making bets for him. It would be nice if he had won, but unfortunately he lost about $30,000. The next day we thought we would have a field day, because they liked his action so much. But the next day they wouldn’t let him play more than one table at a time. The reason they gave was, there were too many opportunities for the dealers to rip off the casino.

RWM: It’s been a long time since I read The Big Player (by Ken Uston and Roger Rapoport), but I seem to remember a story like that only Ken was the BP.

Al Francesco: Ken was constantly taking credit for things he didn’t do. Usually it was for things I did, but in this case it was really Bill.

The Great Plays

RWM: Did you play much out of the country?

Al Francesco: A couple of years after I went to Panama with Revere, I went back with Bill. It was my first really successful trip. We won about $39,000 in three weeks with a maximum bet of $200. The game was very good over there. They had surrender and you could resplit aces and then double down. The first card off the 4-deck shoe they would show you and then burn it. Then they would deal the entire 4 decks except the last card and then show you that one.

Bill was in training the first few days and I would watch him play for a while, and when there was half a deck left, I would ask him what the count was. He’d tell me, and then I’d count the rest of the shoe to see how accurate he was. He was pinpoint accurate every time, so he started playing one table and I’d play my own. After a couple of weeks we were playing at one casino spreading to seven hands of $200. We’d play about three hours and then it would be time for a break. The casino knew we were friends but not partners.

Anyway, we had been playing about three hours and I thought it was time for a break. I got up and went over to Bill’s table. He had five hands with $200 on each, and he was thinking about what to do. I had more experience than Bill, and I saw that no matter what the count was he couldn’t hit any of the hands. In Panama the dealer doesn’t take a hole card.

I said to the dealer, “Hit your hand,” and pointed at the dealer’s face card. The dealer instantly hit himself with an ace. Bill jumped about three feet in the air and said, “What are you doing?” as the dealer started scooping his money. The dealer pointed at me and said, “He told me to hit.” Bill said, “That’s my money.”

The pit boss came over, and they loved our business, so the pit boss told the dealer to give the ace to Bill. Bill had all pat hands except one hand with a pair of nines. He split the 9s into the face card, and got the ace on one and a face card on the other. The dealer drew a 7, so Bill won six hands instead of losing five. Bill really knew how to read little situations like that and take advantage of them.

The Bahamas are just bad news. I heard what happened to Tommy Hyland but that was after my trips there. My first trip was in 1972 or ’73. I was with Bill and we were on our way home after playing in Panama. We stopped in the Bahamas and saw a headline in the paper. It said something like, “52 murders in the last year, not one arrest.” We played for a short time and lost about $6,000. The game didn’t look beatable so we were going to leave. On the way out we were picked up by casino security. They took us up to our room and claimed that we were cheating them.

RWM: Even though you lost?

Al Francesco: They claimed we were ahead $6,000, and they wanted their money back. Bill had never been on a trip like this before, and he let me make the decisions on how to handle it. I refused to give in to them even though there were five security guards and a couple of pit bosses in our room. We were outnumbered and at their mercy.

They went through our stuff and found a lot of traveler’s checks. Fortunately we didn’t have a lot of cash. I just wouldn’t admit that we had won $6,000 when we had lost. Plus, we weren’t doing anything wrong. We were just counting cards.

I told them they should check with the pit boss in the casino, because they had their information wrong. They checked downstairs and then they said it was $3,000 not $6,000, but they wanted the $3,000. We went back and forth and by now it was five o’clock in the morning. Now instead of seven people in our room it was down to three.

Eventually they left, but called us on the phone and said they would report us to the IRS. That was good news to me, because it meant we were going to get off the island.

An hour later it was time to leave and we had to go to the cashier’s cage where we had a safe deposit box. They didn’t know about the box, but that was where all our cash was. We had to wait about twenty minutes to get in the box. We thought they were stalling for time to have security there when we opened the box, but the way it turned out it was just ineptness on their part. We finally got in the box with no interference and got on the next plane out of there.

A year and a half later, Ken Uston and another of our players, named Blair, were in the Bahamas with Bill and me. [An interesting side note–the “Blair” that Al mentions here is Blair Hull. He went on to become a hugely successful options trader in Chicago, and sold his company to Goldman Sachs for over 500 million dollars. He is featured in the book New Market Wizards, by Jack Schwager, and is considering running for senator in Illinois in 2004.]

There were two islands with casinos. One island was okay and the other was bad. We started off in one casino playing hole cards. They were lifting the hole card way up and it was so easy to see — it was the sloppiest game I’ve seen in my life. Bill won $13,000 and I won $15,000. We were at separate tables.

After we left that casino they wanted to go to the other casino in the bad part of the Bahamas — the same casino where Bill and I had been held hostage. I was surprised Bill wanted to go back there. We went, and there were no hole cards to play, so we decided to take the night off. We let our hair down and spent about three hours drinking wine and having a nice dinner.

After dinner Ken went over to a blackjack table and started playing $10 a hand. I walked by the table and he was reaching for $10 to double down on a hand and I reached into my jacket pocket and threw him $10,000 on the table and kept on walking. There was no good reason to do it, but I did it. I don’t know if that was a good thing or a bad thing as it turned out. It might have called attention to me, and that was why they picked me up a few minutes later, or maybe that was one of the reasons they recognized me. On the other hand, when they picked me up, I didn’t have any cash on me.

About ten minutes later I was picked up by security. Nobody saw them pick me up. I was in this back room all by myself, and it was three o’clock in the morning. One of the guys flashed some kind of ID really fast, and I asked if I could see it again.

He said, “Fuck off.”

With that kind of remark you don’t know if these guys really are police or security guards or what. I recognized the people from a year and a half earlier that had told me not to come back to the island. I told them I didn’t play, and I had reservations on the first plane out in the morning. They got my wallet and went through all my stuff. They found some names and phone numbers which I didn’t want them to find, like Ken’s and Bill’s. They started leading me out of the office and I saw they weren’t going to let me go.

I asked if I could make a phone call. They asked whom I wanted to call. I said I wanted to call my brother in San Francisco. As soon as I said that, three of them picked me up by the belt and whisked me out a side door. They put me in an unmarked station wagon. I remembered that headline about the 52 unsolved murders and my life flashed in front of me. I really thought I was a dead man. Remember that it was three in the morning and none of my friends knew this was happening to me.

They took me to my hotel and searched my room. Then they said, “Be on the next plane out of here,” and they let me go.

Bill and I went to France four times and always had a field day because at that time they didn’t know the game was beatable. We actually broke one casino, which was supposedly the eighth largest casino in France. We beat them for $230,000. Casinos in France are nowhere near as large as in Vegas. They had three blackjack tables and a nice hotel. It didn’t seem like $230,000 would be enough to break them, but it was. We didn’t collect all the money we won, but we got most of it. I still have a check for $20,000 in my files.

Another time, Blair and Ken Uston were in Monte Carlo, and they knew Bill and I were planning a trip to Europe. They called because they were running low on money. Two days later KP and I were in France. KP was the girl I was dating at the time and a very good counter.

We went to Monte Carlo and they had opened a new modern casino, Loews. Normally, because of jet lag, I don’t even consider playing the first day I arrive. This time we went straight to Loews and when I walked in the casino, Ken was jumping around from table to table back-counting. Blair was sitting down at a table by himself. They were both betting up to two hands of $500, because they only had about $25,000 with them.

When I came I had $125,000 with me. KP sat down and right away had a hot deck so she called me over. I started playing seven hands of $500. Ken saw me so he started calling me onto his table. Then Blair started calling me in. Ken and Blair were betting two hands of $500, and I’d bet the other five spots of $500. We got up $29,000 in under two hours and the pit boss threw his hands up in the air and said, “That’s it. If you want to continue playing, you have to start making big bets off the top of the shoe.”

My comment was, “Cash me in.”

RWM: That sounds like a pretty sharp pit boss for that time.

Al Francesco: Yes. The following morning we knew we weren’t going to play there anymore, so when KP and I went down to eat we saw Ken and Blair having breakfast. Two tables away there were five pit bosses eating. We walked straight over to Ken and Blair’s table and sat down, letting the pit bosses know we were all together. I had never done anything like that before, but I knew we weren’t going to play another hand in that casino, so I felt like rubbing it in their face.

RWM: You went there with $125,000. Were you worried about carrying such a large amount of money?

Al Francesco: A good portion was always in traveler’s checks. Those are easy to cash. But carrying cash is just part of the problem of the game. It’s something you have to contend with.

It was really a problem in Korea. In Korea you aren’t allowed to take more than $10,000 out of the country. Bill and I played there. After about a day I noticed that the dealer was marking the cards, but not intentionally. Every time the dealer had a face card or ace as her upcard, she would peek to see if she had blackjack. She would snap the corner of the card trying to protect the hole card from anyone behind her trying to see it. Evidently, a few weeks before there had been a team in there spooking, so they were making a great effort to protect the hole card.

[Spooking is a move where a spotter, known as a “spook,” is positioned across the pit from a dealer that lifts his hole card too high when checking for a blackjack. The value of that card is signaled to a player sitting on that dealer’s table. This move has been thwarted since the ’80s, when casinos either stopped checking the hole card, or started using mirrored or electronic card readers. There is an entertaining scene involving a spooking play at the beginning of the movie “Casino.”]

While they were protecting the hole card, they were bending all the tens and aces in the corner. Later, when that card was the dealer’s hole card, I could identify it as a face card or an ace with 100% accuracy. The deck stayed in play for 24 hours, so it didn’t take long for the whole deck to be marked. When I noticed that, I started signaling Bill. He was playing and I was looking for the marks.

I was signaling him when to hit and stand. He didn’t understand why I was making some odd plays. Eventually we took a break, and back in the room I told Bill what was going on. We got out Thorp’s book and there was the complete playing strategy, given this information. Two hours later we were back in the casino betting seven hands of the limit, which was only $100. We played for eight hours and won $51,800.

When we went to Korea we didn’t know how long we were going to stay, so we only had a five-day visa. We had to leave the next day to renew our visas, and we had to figure out how to get all that cash out of Korea. We had to deal with the black market to change the money into dollars. You never know what you’re getting into when you deal with the black market, but it’s just one of those things you have to deal with as a blackjack player.

Then we had to take the money out. If they caught us they would confiscate the money, and we could go to prison for ten years. We decided to put the money in our shoes. We both had $10,000 in each shoe. We walked right through the airport, and we were both an inch taller that day. They searched us pretty thoroughly, but they didn’t look in our shoes.

We went to Japan to renew our visas, and then went back to Korea, thinking we were really going to clean up. When we got back, the first time the dealer had a ten as an upcard she did the same move, bending the corner. Then the pit boss gave her a mean look. She picked up the face card and straightened out the corner. Next time, she kinked the card again, the pit boss gave her the look again, and she straightened it out. We started just counting and they started shuffling up on us, so we left Korea.

More on Ken Uston

RWM: What year did you start the Big Player concept?

Al Francesco: I came up with the idea in ’71 or ’72 and I probably met Ken in ’73.

RWM: When did it become exposed?

Al Francesco: That probably happened in 1975.

RWM: Didn’t you continue to play with Ken Uston after that?

Al Francesco: We were friends after that. He was doing a lot of hole-carding after that. [Hole-carding means seeing the dealer’s hole card through various methods. I mentioned earlier that this could be done by spooking, or by “first basing,” which is seeing the card from the first seat at the table when the dealer checks for blackjack. A third method, called “front loading,” is to spot the hole card when the dealer tucks it underneath the upcard. Any of these methods provide a much bigger edge than counting cards, but spooking and first basing are almost non-existent, since most casinos don’t manually check the hole card anymore.]

RWM: So you didn’t hold a grudge against Ken for blowing the Big Player concept?

Al Francesco: I should have, but I didn’t. All the people on the team were pissed off at him except Bill. They became very close, but everyone else hated Ken with a passion. They were having the time of their lives and making good money and Ken ruined it for them.

Blackjack Computers

RWM: When did you play with the hidden computers?

Al Francesco: That was probably two years later.

RWM: How did that project come about?

AF: Ken Uston introduced me to Keith Taft, who lived in Sunnyvale at the time. He was an extremely religious guy and he was ingenious. He came up with this idea of putting a computer in your shoes. He was looking for someone to run a team for him, and Ken thought I’d be the right guy. Keith and I hooked up and I was retired at the time, but I liked the idea. I started teaching people how to use these computers operated in their shoes.

RWM: How did it work?

Al Francesco: We were inputting the exact value of the card but the suit was immaterial. There were two switches in each shoe. They were on the top and bottom of our big toes.

With those four switches you could input any card. The four switches had values of 1, 2, 4, and 8, so by combining switch 8 with switch 2 you could make a 10. If you were playing heads-up, you saw your first two cards and you would input those two. Then you would input the dealer’s upcard, and the computer would tell you how to play the hand.

The feedback was a buzzer on the ball of your foot. It didn’t make any noise but you felt a little vibration. A buzz would mean hit and buzz-buzz would mean stand, and so on. We had various signals telling us what to do in any situation — double down, surrender, raise your bet, and lower your bet.

We had a house in Reno for about three months. When we first started out there was always something going wrong. Wires would break, the shoes would fall apart, the batteries would fall out of the heel, and you needed someone to maintain the equipment all the time.

Our idea was to play single-deck and flat bet. At that time the casinos were very paranoid about counters. We thought that if we flat bet we would get away with it forever. But the shoes we put the computers in were a little on the bulky side. We had some comments from the pit bosses about the size of our shoes. One of our players told the boss that he had a big toe problem, and these were the only shoes he could fit into.

One time, one of our players was walking across Las Vegas Boulevard thinking about what had happened to him in the Desert Inn on a play. As he was walking across the street, a car hit him and knocked him right out of his shoes. I happened to be coming across the street and saw the whole thing. But he was okay. He was just wrapped up in his play and oblivious to the traffic on that street.

Most of the players that I trained were new to the game of blackjack. Our training took six or eight weeks and I had to start at ground zero, because most of these people had never played before. Some of them were not even gamblers. The biggest bet they had made in their life might have been $5, but in short order I had them out betting a hundred or two hundred dollars. We probably had an edge of 1½%, but if you run across a dealer who’s cheating you, that can evaporate quickly. I think that’s what happened to us a few times.

We played for nine months, but we didn’t make any money. I think we tried to do too much, and flat betting might not have been aggressive enough. We lost about $75,000 altogether between Keith’s work and our losses. It wasn’t a big deal, just nine months of our time. Not one person was arrested or pulled up. At that time computers were not illegal.

I’ve always been able to come up with new ideas. I hit the casino with an idea they haven’t seen before, so I’m able to take advantage of it. They have no idea how they’re getting beat.

The Drop

RWM: What other plays have you tried?

Al Francesco: Another concept I played was called “the drop.” I’d play single-deck, and when I cut the cards I would lift the top of the deck and tilt it toward someone at the next table who would spot the card. Then I would drop four or five cards back onto the deck and cut. When the dealer completes the cut, I know either the fourth or fifth card down.

Depending on what that card is you know how many hands to play to either get the card for yourself or give it to the dealer. The skill you had to master was knowing exactly how many cards you dropped. I could do that with 95% accuracy. I’d generally play three hands of $500 off the top. The casinos thought they had a big edge because you’re starting off with a zero count, but I had an average edge of 16%.

I played that for about six months, but it was the type of idea that couldn’t be used a lot because you needed perfect conditions. It was usually a three-man concept. You needed a table to yourself. Then you needed someone at the next table who could see that card when you flashed it to him. Then you needed another person across the pit who would relay a signal to you letting you know whether it was a big card or a small card. Those conditions were hard to find.

RWM: I suppose that is why they did away with letting people cut by hand.

Al Francesco: Right. That and there was another team that was cutting to aces which may have had more to do with them introducing the plastic cut card. I was arrested for playing the drop at Fitzgerald’s in Reno. To this day they don’t know what I was doing. They knew I was doing something, but they couldn’t figure it out. I had to hire an attorney, but after a while they just dropped it.

RWM: Do you think that was cheating?

Al Francesco: The drop concept was tainted. Some people would say it’s dishonest, but if it was dishonest I don’t give a damn. I know how many times I was mistreated or cheated by the casinos and I was getting even with them. Hole-carding is not dishonest; it’s been tested in the courts.

RWM: How did your wives handle this gambling?

Al Francesco: I got into playing blackjack at the tail end of my first marriage. I was married the second time to a Venezuelan girl and she knew about my blackjack. She took it pretty well.

RWM: Are you still playing blackjack?

Al Francesco: I went back to blackjack again in the ’90s when Arnold [Snyder] put together a team called CRAPS. We started as a straight card counting team. We had great people on the team, but for some reason we didn’t make any money. After about a year we threw in the towel, but at that time I came up with the idea for an ace-sequencing team. It took me about six months to put together the concept. I played around with four or five different ideas on how to memorize these sequences of cards. Some of the ideas weren’t very good. I finally came up with one that worked extremely well.

RWM: Did you read memory books?

Al Francesco: I read every book I could find about memory and had eight hours of tapes I studied. I can’t do it now because I’m out of practice, but one time I played an eight-deck game where I memorized 24 sequences and was able to recall all 24. Most of the time you play a six-deck game and you might see 12 or 13 that you memorize. I taught a number of people and we did very well with it.

RWM: What are you working on now?

Al Francesco: At the moment I’m on the other side of the table in a way. I’m involved in a banking operation here in California. These card rooms can’t accept bets from customers. The bets have to be between players. If one customer wants to bet $1,000 and there is no one at the table who wants to bet that much, then he can’t make that bet. That’s where I come in. I supply someone at the table who accepts all bets. We have bankers in a bunch of casinos, so it is like being on the other side right now. I never thought I’d be in this position. I’m still not the casino, I’m sort of a middle man.

I’m also involved in horse racing. I’ve tried to beat the horses on and off for over 20 years. The first time I tried with my three brothers. We spent $45,000, twenty years ago, gathering data from all the California and New York tracks. We had a guy named Bill Quirin help gather all this data, and he ended up writing a book about our study – without our okay [Winning at the Races, by William Quirin, 1979].

He was just like Ken Uston. It was a very successful book. It was the best book on horse racing at that time. We thought we had some winning systems at that time, but they didn’t hold up. About four years ago we started playing the Pick 6 and we hit a few. We think we have a winning system right now, but we haven’t played long enough to know for sure.

I also have a website, http://www.freesportsplay.com. It’s a place to play games for free and have a chance to win from $500 to $100,000. I’m supposedly retired now but I probably work ten hours a day.

RWM: No blackjack?

Al Francesco: I think blackjack is behind me now. I may not play another hand of blackjack in my life, but I don’t know. [Al stopped to think for a moment.] I did come up with another concept about two years ago… ♠

Posted on Leave a comment

How Much Can You Win Online on $10 or $20 Free Play?

Learn the Optimal Strategies for Free Play Bonuses at Online Casinos

by the Editors at Blackjack Forum
© 2006 Blackjack Forum Online

At the time this article was written, Mummy’s Gold online casino was offering players a $500 free roll. The deal was: Play for an hour on the house on $500 free (no deposit required) and your winnings up to $100 become your bonus for a $20 deposit.

Crazy Vegas and Golden Riviera were giving away $75 free to play on with no deposit required from the player at any time. The deal was: Transfer your winnings up to $75 to a real account and play on them, and your winnings were yours to keep.

7 Sultans online casino was offering players $50 free, with no deposit required at any time, with any winnings up to $100 becoming a no-deposit bonus.

Casino Classic was offering $500 free to play on for an hour, with your winnings up to $200 becoming a bonus for a small deposit, and Captain Cook’s was offering exactly the same free play deal.

Blackjack Ballroom was also offering players $500 free to play on for an hour, with your winnings up to $200 becoming your bonus for a $20 deposit.

At Royal Vegas, new players could try out the casino with free slot spins with their winnings becoming a bonus, while at Fortune Room you could get $100 free to play on, no deposit required, to earn a bonus up to $500 for a $50 deposit.

Lucky Emperor, Virtual City and Zodiac Casino were all giving away $10 in free bonus play money, no deposit required.

Plus, all of these online casinos (and many others) regularly put free gambling money (from a few dollars up to hundreds and even thousands of dollars) into the accounts of their loyal customers—again, no deposit required.

To many players, these small free bonus offers may not look all that valuable. You can’t even pay your monthly light bill with $10 these days. But what you have to remember is, these free play bonuses give a lot of gambling power. How much gambling power?

Online Players Win Thousands Playing on Free Play Money

Players at Blackjack Forum Online have scored big on small online casino free money offers many, many times. For example, when Golden Palace gave a player $16 free about a year ago, he bet the entire amount on one spin of the 8-line Gold Rally slot, and immediately hit a bonus round that paid him $900!

Another player at Blackjack Forum Online played $2 coin on single-line Jacks or Better video poker with his $10 free at Lucky Emperor. She got a pair of Jacks on the first deal, and using the double-or-nothing feature, doubled her payout four times, to $160. Now she figured she had some money to play on.

A few hands later, she hit a royal, for a payout of $8000! But it didn’t stop there. The $10 free had a small wagering requirement before this player could cash out, and while playing off this wagering requirement she hit 4-of-a-kind—not once, but twice—for another $500! She ended up cashing out just under $8500 on $10 free, without ever depositing a penny herself.

Another player at Blackjack Forum Online had good luck on the Royal Vegas free spins offer. After hitting some good payouts on Lara Croft, Tombraider, he had won a little over $100 that he could transfer as a bonus to a real account.

There, he chose to play Secret Admirer, betting all nine lines for $45 a spin, and on his second spin got a $30 payout. He gambled it on the double-or-nothing feature three times to turn it into a payout of $240.

He hit nothing on the next few spins, and only small returns on the ones after that. But when he was down to his last $45 spin, he hit three Diamond Rings in a row, and before he’d even realized what was happening was launched into Free Spins that made him over $4500!

“It was the first time I’d ever played slots,” this player said.

Another player at Blackjack Forum Online ran up the first big gambling win of his life at Casino Classic, on the casino’s “play free for an hour on $500” deal.

“For me, it was just a lark,” he said. “I figured, what could I lose? I had some time to kill and ran up the $500 to $1000 just trying out various slots, then transferred the max [editor’s note: $200] to a real account. Then I played Thunderstruck, and hit some kind of jackpot. At first, I didn’t even know I hit it, because I never hit a jackpot before. I was just sitting there and staring. Suddenly there was all this money in my account.

“After I won, I didn’t really expect to get paid all this money. This was an online casino, and I’d never even put in a dime. But you know what, they did pay me—every penny, and with no trouble at all. There I was, just fooling around, and suddenly I was $1900 richer.”

Free Play Bonuses are Great Deals and Easy to Play

The requirements attached to most online casino free money offers are minor. Some casinos (but not all) require that you download the casino software. (Don’t worry, this is easy to do, and the software is easy to uninstall if you don’t want it later. To uninstall, just highlight the casino in the list of programs on your computer, found by clicking your “Start” button, and click “Uninstall”.)

Most online casinos require you to give some wagering on your free money winnings. And many require you to make a small deposit (typically $20) before transferring or withdrawing your winnings (there will usually be no requirement to wager this small deposit).

Some online casinos, like Casino Classic and Mummy’s Gold, treat your free money winnings as a bonus. In this case, you must complete a wagering requirement on the bonus to withdraw it, but you may withdraw your deposit and any winnings on the bonus at any time.

The purpose of these requirements is to direct the free money, which has a lot of potential value, to players who might truly be interested in becoming a long-term customer.

Winning Strategies for Playing on Free Money Bonuses

So, what’s the best way to give yourself a good shot at big money on a small free money bonus? The answer is two-part. The first part is to play with aggression. Remember, it’s hard to win big if you’re betting only a penny a spin on slots, or a dollar a hand at blackjack.

The second is to play a game that offers big payouts for small bets, like slots or video poker. Don’t play a game like blackjack, where if you bet $10 you win $10 (or at most, $15, if you get a natural). You would have to make too many bets, and have too long a run of luck, on an even-money payout game to ever get close to big money. On slots, video poker, or roulette (where a lucky hit straight up on a number pays 35:1) you only need to get lucky once to make a good score.

Just be sure not to bet too aggressively for the particular free money bonus. When your win amount is unlimited, you should play as aggressively as possible. But what’s the use of hitting a royal that pays thousands when your maximum win is $100? Adjust your aggression for your goal.

So don’t ignore those baby bonuses—whether they’re free gambling money offers designed to entice you to try an online casino for the first time, or one of those free play bonus gifts online casinos give to loyal players. These small free money bonuses are great deals for players. Almost every player we know who has given them a chance has won big on at least one, and some professional gamblers have actually launched their gambling careers with free money wins. Give yourself a chance to get lucky. ♠

Posted on Leave a comment

The First Line of Defense: Selective Shuffling

The First Line of Defense: Selective Shuffling

by Sam Case

(From Blackjack Forum Vol. IV #1, March 1984)
© 1984 Blackjack Forum

I recently talked with a long time professional blackjack player who’s seen the game change over the years. He told me that false shuffles and second deals–all the cheating moves–used to be much more common than they are today. He said he used to see dealer cheating at blackjack in casinos all the time. Now it’s pretty rare. I asked him what he thought is the most common cheating technique nowadays and he said, “Shuffling up.”

I must agree with that. Generally, the first thing a pit boss does to discourage a card counter is have the dealer shuffle up. This happens much sooner than it used to. In fact, whatever ways I’ve used to get an edge at the blackjack tables (besides counting), the pit bosses will often order more frequent shuffles as a first line of defense.

These days a dealer will often be instructed to “shuffle up after three hands;” unlike the old “shuffle up when he ups his bet.” They’ve wised up to that one. You can’t usually get a dealer to shuffle away those bad decks by simply raising your bet anymore. That ruse looks like a thing of the past.

To make matters worse, many dealers now know that if a lot of low cards come out, the player has the advantage. So even if you’ve got a great act, you may find that your sweet 39-card dealer shuffles after two rounds if the cards are all low. This hurts not only counters, but non-counters as well. It’s a neat little percentage play. It forces all of the players at the table to play at a greater disadvantage.

I’ve seen a good bit of selective shuffling. I’ve also seen what it does to beginning counters. They will frequently sit through deck after deck, cursing their luck, just because they occasionally get a 75% shuffle point (on negative decks, of course!). Also, they get so bored by all of the negative counts and small bets that they jump their bets when they get the slightest edge. They wind up increasing their fluctuations more than their bankrolls.

Who’s behind selective shuffling? According to Anthony Curtis, publisher of the Las Vegas Advisor, no Las Vegas casinos appear to be using selective shuffling as a standard operating policy. As publisher of a monthly report on Las Vegas casino conditions, Curtis says he’s heard many reports of selective shuffling, and has witnessed it himself on numerous occasions. His observations indicate it’s never house policy — just enterprising dealers doing it on their own.

Dealers who shuffle selectively probably don’t do so for personal profit. Although the casinos do their best to promote an image of relaxed, easy going fun, there’s lots of pressure.

Statistics are kept on all dealers, pits, etc. When the pit falls short of expectation — even from normal fluctuation — the heat gets turned on. Pit bosses get pressure, and they pass it on to dealers. Dealers soon learn that all goes well when the players lose. They’re the only ones in position to do anything about the pressure, so it’s not surprising that some of them are tempted to up the house advantage.

Is Selective Shuffling Cheating?

Is it cheating? I think so. It’s an intentional manipulation of the cards to lessen a player’s advantage. Could a casino be successfully prosecuted for selectively shuffling? I doubt it. First, the casino would argue that it’s not to blame. Secondly, it is nearly impossible to prove that the shuffle point changed with the count. You’d need hours of movie film to prove anything, and they have the cameras, you don’t.

You may feel it’s possible to get a quick-shuffling dealer to deal deeper by toking him. It may be possible – but it probably won’t be worth your while. A couple of years ago, I used to toke for this purpose. I thought it was damn clever, too. Then the good Bishop told me how much money I was wasting (see Chapter 12 of Blackbelt in Blackjack — “Toking Guidelines”). Now I just walk. I always figure there’s a better game somewhere else.

I don’t want you to get too paranoid about dealers who shuffle away those positive decks. Since rounds that are composed mostly of low value cards tend to use up lots of cards, shuffles often follow after fewer hands when low cards come out. The trick to catching a dealer who’s cheating you with a shuffle-up is to watch the shuffle-point, not to count rounds. If you notice a large difference in the depth of penetration, with a deeper deal when your count is negative, that’s the tip-off. You should find another game.

Along the same lines–when I was just starting out as a card counter, I noticed this guy would pop over when the count got high, and leave during the shuffle. I hadn’t heard of table-hopping yet. I learned, though, after about 10 minutes. Not knowing what to do, I quietly left.

As it turns out, that’s the right move. You can’t sit through dealers who shuffle-up or table-hoppers who consistently eat your high counts. To earn your percentage, you must get in the expected number of good hands. ♠

Posted on Leave a comment

A Funny Thing Happened on My Way to the Forum

A Funny Thing Happened on My Way to the Forum

By James Grosjean

(From Blackjack Forum Volume XXI #1, Spring 2001)
© 2001 Blackjack Forum

[Ed. Note: Last year, when I published James Grosjean’s first book, Beyond Counting, I wished that I could tell you the story that follows. I couldn’t. In fact, I only knew a small portion of what had happened when this casino surveillance department, to harrass two professional gamblers for a win, falsely accused them of cheating on a game. Now, James relates the whole story. — Arnold Snyder]

[Follow-up note from A.S.–Since this article was first published, James Grosjean has been voted into the Blackjack Hall of Fame. He is the author of Beyond Counting, one of the great works on professional gambling.]

Easter 2000

“Brighter days are ahead, young man.” What nerve he had trying to cheer me up. He was the one who had already missed one insulin shot because of the apathy of the jail guards, and no remedy was in sight. I smiled. He had caught me in a down moment, but of course he was right. And, I couldn’t help but be pleased that he had called me “young man.” I guess it’s all relative; he was quite old.

At that moment, I was bored more than anything else. It was Easter Sunday, there was nothing to watch on TV, no one to talk to, nothing to talk about, because I was sitting in a “holding tank” at the Clark County Detention Center. My “crime”? I am a professional gambler who is good at a card game. Very good.

Money Eyes

That Friday morning started like every other day that week: Wake up on the couch at Mike’s place and get ready for the Vegas heat. The addictions kick in right away: Mike always wants to swing by Starbucks first, I want to hit the games first. We strike our usual compromise. I’ll check one or two particular games high on my list, and if they aren’t immediately available, then we’ll go grab some coffee.

Checking on a particular game is in fact the only reason I am still in Vegas. I was scheduled to leave four days ago, but after my ex-partner Fredo betrayed me to a bunch of Vegas hustlers, I am hanging around town monitoring things, verifying the extent of the damage, but that’s another story (“The $80,000 Game”). Though my ex-partner already broke our deal, I am still keeping my word to not divulge that game, not even to Mike, with whom I’ve been staying all week. So, Mike and I hit the Strip a bit before noon, and I tell Mike that I’ll check on a few games and meet him at Caesars in about ten minutes.

Not much is happening at Caesars. Mike is checking out a game. It looks beatable, maybe an edge around 3%–6%. Perhaps it isn’t worth the exposure, but if we can pop it for $500–$1000, I could afford a muffin with my latte, so we decide to experiment a few hands. I sit in one seat, then another, with Mike playing here, then there. The dealer is definitely flashing, but she is a bit inconsistent, and I don’t want the frustration. Surely there are better games out there.

We are about to leave, when we see a new dealer come to the table. She watches for about 15 minutes, learning the game for the first time. We’re willing to teach her a few things. Then, to our amazement, she says this will be her table for the day, until 7 p.m. Where I’m from, a dealer would receive instruction away from the table, then watch an experienced dealer for a while, then deal for a few hours with an experienced dealer shadowing, and only then would the dealer be “signed off,” if competence has been demonstrated. Could Caesars be so arrogant to think that they could just tell a dealer the rules of a game for 15 minutes and then assign her the table?

After only a few hands, we know that our new dealer Steph is a “superstar,” so we start right in: “So, Steph, how long you been dealin’?” “What other games do you deal, Steph?” “Is today your Friday, Steph?” “Steph, would you mind filling out a questionnaire so that we can add you to our files. Please attach a passport-size photo, too.” It is going to be a good Friday.

In terms of the numbers, the SCORE of this game is around $5000. We are underbetting, though, because we are afraid that Caesars might not be able to stomach the action. We don’t want them to banish Steph to the roulette wheel, or worse, kick us out. Mike has been half-joking about wanting to win enough this week to buy a boat, so he is betting around $400 per hand. I am betting less, about $300 per hand; I want that muffin with my latte.

Steph says that she has been dealing ten years. Really, it’s more like a week, 500 times. Apparently no one has ever shown her how to hand-deal a game. Or perhaps she underestimates the training of our eyes. She isn’t giving it up too blatantly, just a bit off in the angle of her wrist when she snaps her hole cards. Not much, really just enough to give us a 35% edge.

After a couple of hours, I am getting quite used to the speed, the angle, the lighting, the design of these cards. I am very pleased with my play. I have made some gutsy calls, and though my chip pile is only treading water, my eyes are on the money. Beating the card game is always the easy part.

On the dead roulette game behind us, there is a nosy dealer who keeps trying to see our cards. If we had a third teammate, we’d send him to play roulette. It’s important to turn observers. This dealer is nosy to the point of being rude, and is costing the crew some tips, at least from me.

At around 4 o’clock, after three hours of play, Mike and I are ahead $18000, right at expectation. I am up only $800 of that, and we are not splitting, but I have enough for my muffin. I turn to Mike and whisper, “Now the question is: At what point do we leave?” Mike answers, “At 7 o’clock? What are you talking about? Where are you gonna find a game as good as this?!” That isn’t the point, but our decision is made for us about 15 minutes later.

The Tap

With no prior warning or indication of heat, we suddenly get the tap on the shoulder. We are told to step away from the table. We are the only ones playing (probably why the tap came at this moment), and we know we’ll be barred, so without much more than a “Sure, what’s the problem?” we step back and stand there, surrounded by three security guards. Our chips are still sitting on the table, and I’m relieved when they say we can take our chips, an indication that they are going to bar us, but that that will be the end of it. We put the chips in our pockets, and then continue to stand there. And stand there. For twenty minutes we stand there by the table, as security waits for instructions. In the distance there are suits on phones, and it sounds like Gaming Control agents are already on the premises, and have been here for an hour or so watching us play.

We have dealt with incompetent Gaming Control agents before, but in the end, they will have to concede that we have beaten the game legally, and we’ll be out of here, off to laugh about it over coffee. The guards will not answer any of our inquiries about what is going on, and why it is taking so long. They say only, “Thank you for your patience.” In the past, I have recommended that players in similar situations proceed to the exit with cautious confidence. In general, that’s still my advice, but I also always say that each situation is unique, and the player’s response must weigh all factors carefully, and quickly. Here, Mike and I consider it, but agree that there is no chance we could leave. The exit is far away, and we are surrounded by guards. There is no doubt in my mind that any move to the exit would be denied by the Caesars grunts, and the situation would escalate. Worse, the guards would then claim that we “tried to escape” or “created a public disturbance,” or some nonsense. It is clear: we have to stay cool, be sharp, and hope that the Gaming Control agents are not complete morons.

After twenty minutes of staying cool and being sharp, a suit comes over and asks for our names and birth dates. He is apparently a Caesars person; we have no obligation to tell him anything. I hope Mike realizes this, and, true to form, Mike fires off an alias right away, and the guy writes it down. Then I give an alias: “Jack Pozzi, 7/6/51.” Having given names, I’m expecting the guy to read us the Trespass Act and then kick us out. Then the unthinkable happens. The suit announces, “I’m taking you into custody for cheating,” and with that we are handcuffed and led through the casino to a back door.

I have been interrogated once before in my career, surrounded by security and threatened with handcuffs on another occasion, and chased on many other occasions, but the outcome was always just another story for a cocktail party. Nothing like this has ever happened to Mike or me.

While the incompetence of Caesars and Gaming Control cannot be overstated, I don’t understand how they could believe that we were cheating. I think that the more likely causes are envy, malice, and the libelous records of the Griffin Detective Agency regarding Mike. As we are led through the casino, past the gawking eyes of civilians, I am furious, stunned, and a bit nervous. It is comforting to have a partner, the truth, and the law on my side.

The Back Room

We are led into a small room with a desk and a bench. The bench has a metal bar on each end, perfect for handcuffing two prisoners. On the wall are two signs quoting the Nevada Revised Statutes supposedly giving them the right to imprison legal players. (For those of you who are not lawyers, I’ll translate: In the interpretation of Caesars and Gaming Control, if you win a lot of money, they have “probable cause” to arrest you for cheating.) On another wall, facing the bench, is a camera with a sign saying that the room could be recorded by both visual and audio equipment. Sitting on the desk is their in-house still camera. Only a few months ago, a card counter was handcuffed at Caesars. I wonder if he was brought to this same room.

After a moment, guards and suits come, and each of us is searched, and all of our stuff is placed on the desk. It’s a hole-card player’s toolkit: $23000 cash, $80000 chips, 30 player’s cards under different names, 2 baseball caps, 2 pairs of sunglasses, and a bottle of eye drops. They don’t seem surprised that there are no illegal devices in our possession. They are going to have to think for a while longer on what they can fabricate in the way of “probable cause.”

The suits go away, and we are left handcuffed to the bench, guarded by one or two uniforms at all times. As the minutes tick by, I keep my eyes glued to that desk. The guards can’t stop ogling the heap of money and chips, and they all joke, “We should go playing with you guys sometime.” Yeah, right.

At one point, Cod, a guy whom we had not seen previously, comes storming into the room, walks straight up to Mike’s face and yells, “Lemme see your hands, front and back! I’m the guy who’s going to take you to jail!” Mike shows the guy his hands, and the guy yells, “Both sides!” [Uh, hello, dude, Mike just showed you both sides and you were too busy gloating to look.] What is curious about the moment is that the guy is yelling in Mike’s face, even though we have been calmly sitting there handcuffed the whole time. It is disturbing to see how gleeful the guy is about the prospect of taking Mike to jail, and more worrisome that he announced with conviction that he will take Mike to jail, even though the body search turned up nothing, and we have not yet been questioned by anyone. The most curious thing is that the guy leaves the room without saying anything to me, or even acknowledging me. He clearly has a burning desire to hurt Mike. The guy probably has determined that Mike is the “big” player. His envy is showing. He is just a small Gaming Control agent who naively equates sadism with power.

Mike, though, is weakening. He looks depressed, and is hanging his head part of the time, and then getting chatty with the guards, telling them he’s a professional player, and so on. At one point, he even mentions my book [Beyond Counting, RGE, 2000], and I have to hush him and hope the guards didn’t notice. This is not yet the moment to divulge information, and the guards are just peons anyway. I want him to keep his mouth shut, or talk about the weather, and help me keep an eye on our stuff. Unfortunately, being handcuffed on opposite sides of the bench, and probably being recorded by both video and audio, I am having difficulty communicating with Mike.

It is not clear what is going on, but we surmise that Caesars and Gaming Control are reviewing videotape of our play. At about 6:10 p.m., I look over at Mike, and we decide that having been handcuffed for an hour and a half, and with Caesars and Gaming Control apparently still unable to figure out anything, the quickest way out of there is to tell them how we beat the game. Hole-card play is legal, after all.

When the head of Caesars security comes in the room, Mike just lays it out for the guy, explaining that we were playing a break-in dealer who was poorly trained. I give the executive summary: “If you’re playing a card game, and you know your opponent’s cards, you’re going to win. It’s totally legal.” The other guards nod and agree that if the dealer isn’t doing the job right, it isn’t our responsibility to fix it, and why shouldn’t we take advantage? The security chief just says, “That’s very interesting,” and leaves the room.

Now that they know how we beat the game, it shouldn’t be long before we get out of here, and I’m hankering for coffee and a muffin. It’s almost dinnertime, after all.

“Good Cop, Bad Cop”

At about 6:30 p.m., the agents come in and say that they want to question us, me first. They uncuff me and lead me into an office, where GCB agent Duck sits at the desk, Cod stands on the side, and a Caesars uniform stands in the corner. I am glad she is here, because she is the one person who seems to have a shred of integrity. They Mirandize me and say that I don’t have to talk to them, but it is quite clear to me that if I do not talk to them, they will just throw me in jail. At this point, I’m still thinking that cooperation will lead to their grudging admission that while we are not desirable Caesars patrons (i.e., we are not losers), we were playing legally. Since these are actually “officers of the law,” I agree to talk to them, triggering a “Good Cop, Bad Cop” shtick that makes Laurel and Hardy look like Shakespearian thespians.

First, the harassment begins over my identity, since I am not carrying ID. In the back room, I already gave my real name and Social Security number, but Bad Cop isn’t satisfied: “How tall do you say you are?” he asks, his tone dripping with sarcasm. “I don’t know, 5’ 10″? 5’ 11″? I got my driver’s license long ago, and I don’t know if the physical description is quite right.” Then he gets loud with me: “No! Here’s what I think: You’re not ‘James Grosjean.’ That’s just some guy you know.” Apparently, Bad Cop isn’t interested in the truth, but that’s all he’s going to get out of me: “Well, I am. I was a lot lighter then, too.”

Then, Bad Cop tries to get some dirt on me: “So where else [besides Caesars] have you played this week?” OK, the only point of this question is so he can call up those places and have me barred all around town, and get more videotape to figure out who my associates are, how we play, and so on. I tell him: “I don’t see how that’s productive,” and seeing Bad Cop’s head about to explode, I turn to “Good Cop,” who dismisses that line of questioning. Bad Cop asks: “What other games do you play?” I tell him that I play lots of games, anything with an edge. I try not to get specific. “Where did you stay last night?” Again, they’re looking to hang me at other places, but the truth hurts: “I slept on Mike’s couch.”

Having told them I’m a statistician, I start spouting numbers about hole-card theory. I’m giving the guy the statistical edge for this scenario, and that scenario. I don’t think Bad Cop has ever interrogated a statistician, and he’s getting frustrated. They’re not questioning my numbers, but they are obviously unsatisfied. Then I say, “Anyone sitting on the left half of the table could have seen those cards.” With that, Bad Cop triumphantly yells, “So you’re cheating, because you’re using information not available to everybody at the table!” By his interpretation of the law, a counter at third base, or even a BS player at third base, would be cheating, because he uses hit-card information that is not available to the first-base player. The guy is obviously not a legal scholar, nor am I, so I just say, “That’s not what the law means. The point is that I’m no special guy. Anyone could have sat down in that seat and seen this dealer’s cards. It’s totally legal. It’s described in the book, Blackjack and the Law, by Nelson Rose and Robert Loeb.”

Oh, boy, Bad Cop doesn’t want to hear citations: “Well that’s a book. You’re in the real world now!” I see, so in this “real world” of Gaming Control, the law isn’t relevant. He continues on this line of argument: “You’re going to put all this on a book?” and again he says the word “book” with utter disdain. “I have no choice. That’s how we were playing. I’m cooperating as much as I can.” With that, he again has the look of triumph: “Aha! You’re cooperating ‘as much as you can’.” Even when he twists my words, his argument is flaccid. After a bit of further frustration, he says, “I’m not talking to you anymore.” OK, now comes “Good Cop.”

“Well, I’ve looked at the cards, and the aces and tens are bent.” Ah, finally they have figured out something to fabricate, but duh, we weren’t playing blackjack. Why would a cheater bend the aces and tens? I again try to explain to him that with full hole-card information, bending the cards would be useless. He’s not disputing any of my hole-card information, but he’s sticking to his garbage: “Mike has a long history of [card bending].” With that, he shows me a libelous page from the Griffin book with Mike’s picture. Now I know that they really want to get Mike out of the game, and they don’t know what to make of me, and then “Good Cop” confirms that by saying: “We’ve never seen you before, and we’re surprised. You and Mike seem to be from two totally different worlds. How did you meet each other?” Without going into the long story, I just answer, “At the tables.”

So then “Good Cop” pretends to give me some “career advice”: “With your education, you’ve got a bright future ahead of you. If you go get a job, you could make $80000 a year.” I interrupt him by saying, “Actually, it would be more than that.” He continues: “But I can tell you this: if you’ve got a felony on your record, then you’re not going to get hired. They’re not going to say why; they just won’t hire you.” At this point, Bad Cop is still festering, and I’m starting to put “Good Cop” in the “Bad” category as well. He’s desperately trying to get me to roll on my partner, and he’s saying that the tape shows a “subtle move” by Mike where he could be bending the cards. He admits that the “move” is very subtle, which tells me that the tape shows the truth, that there’s absolutely nothing there. It was a hole-carding play, pure and simple. They don’t accuse me of making this “move,” but I think their strategy is to get me to somehow incriminate Mike, but I’ve already told him that I was not bending cards, Mike was not bending cards, and that our win was right at expectation given our edge from hole carding. Now Bad Cop wants to get back into it: “Get Russo in here! Keep ’em apart.”

So they lead me out of the room and make me stand facing the wall while Mike enters for his interrogation. Then they take me back to the back room, and recuff me. Not wanting to talk to the uniform about anything gaming related, I get him going on some macho stuff: tanks and military background. After a while, Mike returns, and we sit for a while. We’re worried. We don’t know if the whole “the cards are bent” is just a bluff to try to get us to accuse each other of things we didn’t do, or whether some Caesars or GCB guys actually tampered with the cards and bent them. It’s obvious that they hate Mike, but we’re still hoping that the truth will be enough to set us free.

After a few minutes, the badges come into the room, and the unthinkable happens: “We are going to arrest you for cheating and take you to the Clark County Detention Center.” Now that this announcement has been made, Bad Cop is on Cloud 9. He starts gleefully counting up the cash and chips again, now that they will be seized as evidence. After counting Mike’s money silently, with us watching along, he looks up and asks Mike, “Well, how much?” Then he looks and points over at me and says, “I know you know” [as if to say, “No help from the audience.”] Then he says he’s going to give us some advice, and it is: “When you get to CCDC, don’t let ’em know that you’re in there for a gaming offense.” “Good Cop” comments that we’d better keep our pants on real tight at CCDC.

The GCB agents are about to confiscate all of our cash and chips, and then they have a private word outside the room with a Caesars person, and then come back in and announce that they will confiscate only our cash, our Caesars chips, and our baseball caps. Our non-Caesars chips will go with us to the Card Counter Detention Center, where the Las Vegas Police Department will take custody.

Before leaving the Caesars back room, they use the in-house camera to take a front shot and profile shot (without our permission). It’s about 9:30 p.m. We’ve been held captive for about five hours already.

Friday Night at The Joint

Still handcuffed, we get into the GCB car and drive to CCDC, which is only a few blocks from the Fremont Street Experience. One at a time, we are processed by LVPD, who inventory all of our stuff and ask some basic questions. Meanwhile, Bad Cop is hamming it up with the LVPD, telling them that we were bending the Aces and Tens (BC: “That’s my story, and I’m sticking to it!”). I don’t trust these cops, and I’m keeping an eye on all my chips sitting on the table, and then the cop checks off the box on his form saying that my “Attention to officer” is “Poor”! Well, excuse me, having never been to jail before, I don’t know the drill, and the verbal instructions are mumbled and vague. Having been stripped of our watches, wallets, and other personal items, but still wearing our street clothes and shoes, we enter The Tank.

There are about 20 guys in the tank, which is a room with a dirty, concrete floor, a wooden bench around the perimeter, a toilet in the corner, a TV with a plexiglass shield, and three phones. The first thing I notice is that there are apparently people sleeping or hiding underneath the wooden benches along the wall. How pathetic, or so it seems. I don’t like the fact that one guy, who looks like a gangbanger, seems to be drooling over us, and I hear him mutter, “Look at the homies they just brought in here.”

Each of us received his “sheet” listing the charges, arresting officers, and so forth. Finally, we get to see the official charges: “Cheating at gambling,” and, since there are two of us, “Conspiracy to cheat.” Each is a felony charge with bail set at $3000, so we need to find someone with $12000 to get us out.

Our first priority is to get on a phone. One phone is apparently broken, and half the people in there are trying to use the remaining two. The phones are finicky. If all goes well, we get a dial tone, dial the number, wait as the number is processed, then hear the tones as the computer redials the number. If someone answers, a pre-recorded voice announces, “This call is coming from the Clark County Detention Center. To accept the call, press 1.” Often the phone doesn’t work, blasting static or computer gibberish, and we have to hang up and start over. It takes some time before we figure out all this, and we don’t want to display our ignorance by asking too many questions. What is clear is that the phone will not allow any long distance calls, 800 numbers, pager numbers, credit cards, or calling cards. Cell phones can sometimes be reached, but the software controlling the phones is apparently adaptive, because the same jail phone would subsequently reject calls to that cell number with a message: “The number you have dialed is blocked.” Basically, the only numbers we can call are local, Vegas home numbers.

That limits our options. The big stumbling block is that Mike, though he lives in Vegas, doesn’t know anyone’s home number. He has these numbers programmed into his cell phone, so he never dials them personally! There is one local number, though, that both of us know — our lawyer’s. He has done some civil work for us, and we could sure use him now. The problem: he went on vacation in Hawaii a few days ago. But, with only one number to call, we call it. We leave messages with his answering service. We try, then get back in the phone line to try again a few minutes later.

There is a list of bail bondsmen on the wall, but unless we can get someone on the outside to bring collateral, the bondsman isn’t going to put up the $6000 to get one of us out. If we could reach someone on the outside, we wouldn’t need the bail bondsman! By some miracle, on the nth try, our call is relayed through to our lawyer in Hawaii. I give him some long-distance numbers to call, and through the fraternity of skilled players, he arranges for a player to come down and post bail for Mike. The guy doesn’t have enough cash to get us both out, but if he gets Mike out, Mike can fetch some money to get me out. This guy and Mike had a falling out in the past, but in crunch time, the vile, illegal actions of the casino bring players together. I have no doubt he’ll bail out Mike, but how long will it take? It is about 3 a.m. Saturday. So much for a good Friday.

We try to nap a bit on the concrete floor. Additional arrestees have arrived, so the room is quite crowded. I try to stay away from the gangbanger, who keeps eyeing me hungrily. We don’t want to talk to anyone about our case; it is no one’s business. Contrary to popular belief, the first question isn’t, “What are you in for?” Here and there I gather that the guys are in here for various offenses — drugs, theft, driving-related crimes, and outstanding warrants in other jurisdictions — but for the most part, each guy is in his own hell, and doesn’t care about anyone else’s problems, so there isn’t much personal inquiry. New people arrive, some of whom have the same, age-old questions: “How do these phones work?” “How do you get bailed out?” “When do we get food?” Having been here a few hours already, we are no longer at the bottom of the totem pole, so we give some expert answers to the newbies.

After a few hours, we are called to be photoed and fingerprinted. The fingerprints, both ink and laser scan, will be sent to the FBI. They’ll check their files to try to identify yours truly, John Doe. I don’t think there are many professional card players running around in the FBI files, so I have no idea what will happen after the FBI check turns up nothing. Texas hold’em players wind up on ESPN, celebrated by the media, personally congratulated by old man Binion, anointed with titles and honors, and photographed with a $1 million cash prize. I get photographed with a number in front of my chest. The $800 I won was from Caesars.

Breakfast comes around 4:30 a.m., now Saturday morning. This is the first food we have had since Thursday night. Each of us receives a plastic tray with a carton of milk, some orange wedges, some eggs, and some waffles (I think) soaking in syrup. The oranges and milk are welcome, and I dare to eat the eggs, but the waffles? Yeah, right. Others immediately ask for my waffles, and there is much bartering of food — the prison economy begins.

When my name gets called out, I am not as excited as Mike was earlier, when we thought bail had been processed. Now I understand that I am in the pipeline, and it’s just my turn to see the jail nurse. As the only non-tattooed people in here, we don’t want to appear soft, so I like the fact that they call out my name as “John Doe.” I am the only John Doe in the tank. Don’t mess with me. The nurse asks about drug use, diseases, medications, and takes my blood pressure. The highest it’s been in my life. Correlation does not imply causality, but I suspect that jail has something to do with it.

As the morning wears on, I become annoyed that the TV is set to a channel that seemingly shows “Cops” several times a day, and some other “court” shows. Having witnessed the apathy of the LVPD, and the malicious incompetence of the G.C.B., I find it nauseating to be subjected to “Cops.” Mike is taking this hard, I think, so it is fortunate that his bail was posted, around 4 a.m. They tell us it could take 24 hours to process, but there is a certain relief in the inevitability of it, that in a day or less, he will be free.

At around 11:30 a.m., my name is called again. Now it is time for my ROR interview. As a John Doe, I can’t be released on my own recognizance, and this potential avenue of release (only three avenues — bail, own recognizance, and judge) will be terminated if bail is posted, which I expect to happen as soon as Mike gets out. Nevertheless, I let the clerk fill out the ROR interview form with names of friends who could vouch for me. I don’t name any family members, because I don’t want them to panic if they receive a call from the Clark County Detention Center. My friends will worry, but not panic. Though I don’t take the option, I think it is a good deal that you can list your wife to vouch for you. (I think that’s a good deal.)

As I am escorted back to the tank, I see a glorious sight — Mike is being escorted out. His bail has been processed and he is leaving! I give him last instructions to get my ID from his apartment and bring it to the jail. I am quite nervous about being left alone, but Mike can do more for me on the outside.

The Shower Room

I call Mike soon, and he has found my ID, but won’t be able to present it to the jailers until 3 p.m., Saturday afternoon, when the desk opens to outsiders. When he does so, they refuse my ID, saying that as a John Doe, they must wait until the FBI verifies my prints. Well, yeah, but that’s because most John Does don’t subsequently present their legal identification! But there is no point arguing with a bureaucrat. In answer to our inquiry about why the FBI is taking so long, their answer is that the FBI is closed over the weekend — a lie. I tell Mike to try during another shift.

Meanwhile, I am moving through the CCDC pipeline. My name is called, and I stand in a line in the hall, apparently to go take a shower. I have no desire to take a shower. The guards seem to treat this as a service, like, “You’ll get to have a nice shower, and some new clothes.” Yeah, right. Not only am I about to go take a shower, but the guys in my line are from other holding tanks, so I don’t know any of them. The guy next to me in line is protesting; he wants to get help for the burning sensation in his penis. The guard’s expert medical advice: just let the hot water run on it, and it’ll feel better. Great, we have to take a shower with Mr. STD over here. The guy keeps wailing, and everyone in our line is thinking, “Please get this guy out of here.” Our prayer is answered.

So, we proceed to the shower room, where we surrender our clothes to the guard. We are given towels and some lye soap, and we take turns in the three showers. After time is up, we line up for inspection, still naked. One by one, we have to open our mouths and raise our arms for the guard. Then we have to lift our testicles. Then we have to turn around and bend over. I’m in here for being good at a card game.

Each of us is issued the jumpsuit, some loose blue pants and shirt (emblazoned with “CCDC,” of course), and a pair of rubber slippers. They give us a toothbrush and, inexplicably, our choice of comb or pick.

It angers me that their procedures, and in some cases, the holes in those procedures, threaten my safety more than is necessary. We have already showered — why do any of us need combed hair? Why are they satisfying a cosmetic purpose at all, especially by supplying devices that can be fashioned into weapons? And, the guard makes the mistake of leaving the room before us, so one or two of the guys do smuggle towels out of the room under their shirts. They could have smuggled other things.

Tank Two

After showering, we are returned to a new holding tank. This one is a bit more spacious, clean, and bright, but otherwise it is the same — a concrete floor, a wooden bench around, a TV with a shield over it, a toilet, and phones. I call Mike to tell him that I have been showered and moved to a new holding tank, where all of us have the CCDC team uniform. There is still no progress on bailing me out. Mike is told that a John Doe cannot be bailed out, so it doesn’t matter if he can put up the $6000 or not; we have to wait until they can identify me. He is getting the red-tape job from hell, and can’t do much for me, but it is so comforting to have someone on the outside, someone trying.

I look around, sizing up this new group: a few Spanish speakers; an outgoing, black kid; an old man with diabetes; a meek Russian whom I met in the previous tank; a tall, aggressive, white guy who has been around the block (he laments how boring it is that “None of us have ‘equipment’ yet.”); and a few others who don’t seem noteworthy or threatening. Black Kid and White Guy are the two who are potentially the most dangerous.

Mike is still trying to give my ID to the Booking Sergeant, and I’m trying to pass the time. Time passes slowly on the inside. The best thing to do is try to sleep. The air conditioning is too strong, so it’s a cold day in hell. By this time I’ve discovered that the best place to sleep is underneath the wooden benches along the wall. It’s a bit darker, more sheltered from being stepped on, and it’s out of view — the best way to stay safe is to go unnoticed.

Dinner consists of something inedible. I give my sugar packets to Black Kid, who’s hoarding them: “These are worth 10 cents a piece upstairs.” I hope I’ll never see “upstairs.” Meek Russian tries to give his milk away to White Guy, and as he holds it out, Thirsty Guy grabs it, at which point White Guy says, “You better watch what you’re grabbing. I believe he was giving that [milk] to me, and I find [your grabbing] offensive.” A bit later I try to placate White Guy by offering a milk I saved from the previous meal. I tell him the milk is no longer cold, and so he declines, but he is appreciative. Now I have to discreetly throw away the milk, because I don’t want to anger White Guy by allowing someone else to drink the milk that he has “dibs” on.

As the hours creep on, I begin to think that I won’t get out over the weekend. The FBI supposedly won’t be able to verify my prints until Monday, and I won’t be able to see a judge until Monday at the earliest, so I’m stuck. I don’t know how long I can last in this room, but I am curious to see if we’ll have any special food tomorrow, Easter Sunday. Yeah, right.

Breakfast at 4:30 a.m. is the same old stuff. A piece of cake. A hot dog. A milk. As Sunday wears on, I am looking forward to the Lakers game that will be broadcast this afternoon. That will kill three hours. The trick is turning the channel. The guard promises to fetch the remote to change the channel, “if she has time.” Yeah, right. We wedged plastic spoons underneath the plexiglass shield to change the channel before, but the spoons were removed during a sweep of the room earlier today.

Together with St. Thomas (who is from the Caribbean), I am able to use our CCDC-issued combs for the same purpose, and the holding tank crowd is quite pleased with our handiwork. The TV reception is horrible, but it is something. Were I at home, I would watch this game anyway, but I find that it’s a completely different experience to watch the game with people I don’t know, mostly criminals, sitting on a concrete floor, with no food and drink, with no freedom, and with uncertainty over what will happen to me. The game ends. I don’t know which team won.

I call Mike frequently, and try to nap, using one slipper as a pillow and the other as a hip cushion against the concrete. My hip is already bruised. I am starting to get hungry, but I am glad I haven’t eaten too much, because going to the bathroom is something I want to minimize. There are three or four guys in the room who have rolls of toilet paper, because they have taken the communal supply and co-opted the rolls for use as pillows. Asking these guys for toilet paper isn’t something I want to do, but no one can hold out forever.

Late that evening, “John Doe” is called. I am going “upstairs.”

Room 9A — RFB at CCDC, Compliments of Caesars

They tell me to grab a bedroll, which is a sheet, a blanket, a toothbrush, soap. I am then escorted to Room 9A. Now this is more like it! Here is my RFB comp from Caesars. This is a large, carpeted, L-shaped room. In the middle of our wing are cots, and I am assigned to one of them. The other wing of the L has tables and chairs to serve as a cafeteria area during meals. Around the perimeter are wooden doors to cells. The doors have only a small window, so the cells do afford privacy, but privacy terrifies me. There are staircases leading up to a balcony around the perimeter, with more cell doors. All together there are about 50 cells. In terms of physical accommodations, this is better than some youth hostels I’ve stayed in long ago.

Of course, it isn’t the physical accommodations that I care about. There are rules posted on the wall, and I quickly and discreetly read them when I get into the room. The main rule that I learn right away is that except for free time (one morning session, one afternoon, and one evening), I am to stay on my cot at all times. During meals we may leave the cots, but only according to the instructions of the guards, and only to enter and exit the line to receive a food tray. Phones may be used only during free time. There are some books on a shelf, and during free time we may pick up books and bring them back to our cot.

Mike informs me that I am scheduled to see the judge Monday morning at 7:30 a.m., so I expect to spend only Sunday night in Room 9A. Yeah, right.

Black Monday

Our 4:30 a.m. breakfast Monday morning is the usual. Crazy Guy is on the cot next to me, so I gave him my extra bread. I don’t want to appear weak, so there are occasions when I trade food instead of giving it away, but then I discreetly throw away the food I receive, because I’m not about to eat anything that another prisoner has touched. After picking up a tray, eating lasts about five minutes, and then we must queue up to return the trays.

Then everyone goes back to sleep. In three hours, I’ll be before a judge. I don’t understand how the judge is able to release me either. If Mike can’t bail me out because I’m unidentified, how can a judge release me if I’m unidentified? Our lawyer isn’t sure how this will work either.

At 8:30 a.m., I awake in a panic. Would they have let me sleep through my 7:30 appointment with the judge? I calmly ask the guard what is going on, because I was supposed to see the judge at 7:30 a.m. “I didn’t call you, because your name’s not on my list.” I can’t believe it. What is going on? I ask if he sees “John Doe” on any list, but of course, all he can tell me is, “This is my list, and you’re not on it, so I didn’t call you.”

I call Mike, who went to the courthouse, expecting to see me. He, too, discovered that I am not on the Monday list. The clerk had erroneously told him that I was scheduled for Monday morning. In fact, I am scheduled for Wednesday at 7:30 a.m. I can’t tell you how gut-wrenching it is to expect release on Monday morning, and then find out that it’s going to be two more days. Even then, would release be certain? I don’t know how I will last two more days. Time stands still on the inside.

“Arnold, Hold the Presses!”

During free time, Cot People are allowed to walk around, and Cell People may leave their cells. Some people play chess, dominoes, cards. Not me. I learn that it’s not wise even to watch others play these games. These folks are territorial, and defensive about strangers watching them play. I make a small joke at the chess table, and Irritable Addict doesn’t think it’s funny. When he starts commenting about how I’ll make a cute couple with this other guy, I nonchalantly slip away, with a vow to avoid the chess players. Luckily, it will take only a few minutes before Irritable Addict gets angry at someone else or something else.

I don’t like the fact that the prisoners have access to “equipment” now. When free time ends, and the prisoners scurry back to their cots and cells, there are quick exchanges of contraband near the cell doors. In some cases, I suspect that drugs are being exchanged, but even money is contraband. Prisoners have access to pens, pencils, and other items that can easily be fashioned into stabbing weapons. There is a pencil sharpener mounted on the wall, available during free time! Cell People there long enough are able to acquire razors! I still think that the safest thing to do is to stay on my cot and keep to myself. Expecting to be there only another two days, I think it is less important for me to make friends than to avoid making enemies.

So I decide that the best way to stay on my cot, even during free time, is to pretend to be reading books. If I can find something good on the shelf, I could even read it. Too much to hope for to find Feller, Volume I, but I’ll settle for any classic. Most of the titles are best-selling mystery thrillers, and I am in no mood. So, I pick up the only classic I can find, The Great Gatsby. I read it long ago in high school, and now I reread it, with better comprehension than the first time. My teacher would be proud.

Since it no longer seems possible to expedite my release, the next order of business is to get a hold of Arnold Snyder somehow. He is about to publish my gaming book, Beyond Counting, and now in light of what has happened, I need him to delay the publication. I need to update some of my advice for players; I need my lawyer to review certain passages; and I need to make sure that the cover is going to be professional-looking, just in case I ever have to face a jury and use my book as evidence. I can’t make long-distance calls, so I tell Mike to call Arnold. Mike does not know Arnold, and in fact, I have never met Arnold either, so this is all quite bizarre.

We make the lucky discovery that if I call Mike using the jail phone, Mike can use Three-Way Calling to get Arnold on the line as well. Arnold tells me that the book is supposed to go to the printer tomorrow, but, out of legal necessity, I tell him, “Arnold, stop the presses!” I need him to wait until I get released, get home, review passages with my attorney, make necessary revisions, and give him a new printout. This will cause a delay of about a week, but it is necessary. [Delaying Arnold’s pipeline may also cause a delay in the release of the second edition of Blackjack Attack, but I hope Don Schlesinger and the readers of that book will forgive me.]

It is ironic that while other prisoners are using their free time to call family and friends, I am calling my publisher. Arnold also agrees to testify as an expert witness on legal advantage play, if it ever comes to that. I can’t say how uplifting it is that a man I have never met would do that for me. It makes me want to fight.

Once per week the prisoners with money in their accounts may fill out order forms for the “commissary.” The following day is like Christmas, with each prisoner receiving his goodies in a big plastic bag. The bags are filled with junk food, stationery, and toiletry items. Giving them candy bars is one thing, but the big sheets of plastic are scary.

One morning, prisoners with shoes may spend an hour out in the recreation yard. I still have only my rubber slippers, but I would not participate anyway. On TV at least, the rec yard is where bad things happen — fights and stabbings. I sleep on my cot.

Some of the prisoners have hobbies. Artist Guy does portraits and nature scenes, sometimes selling illustrated envelopes to other prisoners. Rose Guy made out of toilet paper the most beautiful rose I have ever seen. It has a stem with thorns, and perfect petals. It is the scariest rose I have ever seen.

I finally get word that the FBI has processed my prints. I have no idea how they can release me if the FBI database search turns up nothing. In the end, don’t they have to use my driver’s license, and if so, couldn’t they have used it days ago? Mike posts my bail right away, but it could still take 24 hours to process the bail. Having finished Gatsby, I embark on some lighter reading, a teen “novel” called This Place Has No Atmosphere.

As little as I have in common with any of the guys here, there is one unmistakable bond that we have — we are prisoners, and the guards are guards. After one meal, a couple of guys go to the sink to drink some water, which is not unusual. This particular guard, though, has issues: “There’s no water unless I say so. Sit back down! You just cost everybody half an hour of free time in the morning.” The guard is trying to get us to blame these two prisoners for our loss of free time, but the unanimous feeling among the prisoners is that the only one to blame is the guard. He enjoys the capricious exercise of authority, and such behavior only strengthens our collective resentment of him and his office. Furthermore, we know he is bluffing, because he will not be on duty in the morning to enforce the half-hour reduction in free time. The guard is as weak and foolish as he is sadistic.

As time passes, I become afraid that I will progress to the next step in the pipeline — getting assigned to a cell. Being confined to a cot for most of the day may be safe, but having a roommate? I’m not into gambling.

LVPD Thieves

I am awakened by a tap on the shoulder. My bail has been processed! I will be free in minutes. Not so fast. First I have to get my clothes back, so I am taken to a holding tank, as dingy as the first one. I sit there waiting with a few other guys. Why it is taking so long is a mystery, but a common mystery on the inside. After nearly an hour, a guard comes to process us, and he fetches our bags one by one from storage.

When his bag is returned, Shoeless Guy is missing one shoe. The guard says, “If it’s not in the bag, then you didn’t have it when you got here.” “I came in here with two shoes,” says the prisoner. Then the guard asks, “What size was the shoe?”! The guard goes back to the storage area to “look for the shoe.” Meanwhile, the prisoners speculate that the guard will just go and steal someone else’s shoes from a bag. Sure enough, the guard returns a few minutes later with a pair of shoes. Shoeless Guy takes the shoes, and gives up arguing about his missing shirt. Another eternity passes, but finally we all have clothes.

I agreed with Mike that I would call him and make a beeline for his car when he comes to pick me up. We are worried that cops on the inside will tip off their mugger friends on the outside that we are being released with a stash of chips. We don’t want to tarry and give muggers that chance.

As a guard escorts me down the hall to the property window (like a casino’s cage) to get the rest of my stuff, he says, “There’s a hole in the outer bag, but the inner bags are sealed.” I get to the property window where they produce the bag with my stuff. I see the bags of chips inside the bigger bag, which indeed has a hole in it. I don’t think much of it, and sign for my stuff, and then get escorted to the lobby.

As I wait for Mike in the lobby, I decide to count my chips. When I take out the inner bags, I have a sinking feeling when I see that the inner bags are not sealed, as the guard said. They are just Ziploc bags. I count all the chips, and sure enough, $2000 is missing!

I immediately complain to the guard in the lobby, who summons the other guards, including the Watch Commander. I had been escorted to the lobby, and remained in the empty lobby the entire time. Furthermore, the lobby is being filmed. I offer to let them search me, to show that I do not have the four missing purple chips in my possession.

Naturally, instead of having the slightest concern that a felony theft has occurred in his police station, Watch Commander just says, “You could have counted it back at the window, but you signed the paper.” I argue that I signed for $54,000, not the $52,000 that is in the bag. Further arguments are useless, because the bottom line is that Watch Commander is completely apathetic to my loss of $2000. Looking in his eyes, it is clear that there is nothing I can do, and nothing that I could have done to get that $2000.

Even if I had counted it down at the window, so? There’s $2000 missing. The cops will back each other up. There will conveniently be no film or access log of the property area. They will claim that the $2000 was never there (“You must have come in here with only one shoe!”) To get the money would then require a lawsuit. While $2000 is a nice bonus for a corrupt cop, it’s just small enough that it is not worth my effort. Even if the money could be recovered in a lawsuit, lawyers would eat up most of it. And, with a double felony charge pending, can I risk stirring up animosity by fighting with the LVPD?

By this time, Mike shows up, so we just chalk it up as a business expense, and hop in the car. It’s graveyard shift, and after 4½ days in jail, the Vegas lights have an eerie glow.

The Dream Team

Our court dates are scheduled for exactly one month after our release from jail, so Mike’s is several days before mine. Our first order of business is to get lawyers, and we are in full agreement that we will spare no expense in fighting. All of our legal advisors say that each of us should have a lawyer, so, we retain the two top criminal lawyers in Vegas, in addition to our lawyer-friend on vacation in Hawaii. But they are criminal lawyers, with little understanding of my background, and the nuances of legal, skilled play.

We have seen a group of baccarat players go to jail because of the incompetence of their lawyers, who knew nothing about legal skilled play, so we decide to add none other than Robert Loeb to our team. He’s a criminal lawyer, but also a gaming lawyer and author. And, I know Mr. Loeb personally, having first met him two years earlier at a blackjack table! He will understand the nature of our case at many levels.

The first court date in late May will only be to schedule a Pre-Trial Hearing before a judge, probably in late summer. If the judge decides that there was Probable Cause, he will schedule a date to enter a plea a few weeks later. When we enter a Not Guilty plea, they will then schedule a trial, probably several months after that. So, a trial might not be until December or January, but it is still hard not to think about what would happen there. Were the Gaming Control agents prepared to lie and say that the cards were bent? Worse, had they already bent the cards? The videotape would show no bending, but would they get Griffin “experts” to testify about “subtle moves” and other nonsense? Would a jury of uneducated gamblers have any appreciation for the fact that what we do is legal, and that Gaming Control agents are hardly the unbiased, third-party experts that they pass themselves off as. Naturally the Caesars bosses would lie to protect their careers. In another story (“A Night at the Maxim”) we have court documents that show a casino lying to the Gaming Control Board in an effort to avoid redeeming our chips, so we have no doubts about the corruption of the casinos.

We analyze and overanalyze every scenario. The biggest hypothetical, and one that is relevant to every defendant: If they offer a plea bargain, will we take it? Of course we’re innocent, but what if the prosecutor takes his option to bypass the Pre-Trial Hearing in favor of a Grand Jury? In a Grand-Jury hearing, we would not be present, and even our lawyers would not be present. The prosecution makes its case, and with no rebuttal, it’s quite easy to convince a Grand Jury of probable cause, especially when the prosecution witnesses are prepared to lie and tamper with evidence. So then we could suddenly find ourselves facing a jury that knows nothing about skilled play. Suddenly our use of alias player cards will look “suspicious,” and no doubt our back-room testimony will be taken out of context and twisted. With the truth on our side, and plenty of evidence on our side, we’d be overwhelming favorites, but what if there’s even a 1% chance that a jury could be erroneously convinced that we are cheaters? Is it worth a 1% risk of destroying our lives with felony convictions, or should we admit to something we didn’t do and accept some kind of plea bargain for “Misdemeanor Theft” or something?

It is not an easy question. The ideologue in you may say, “I would never accept a deal where I had to admit to crimes I did not commit.” A piece of me says that same thing, but is it that easy? A felony conviction is so much worse than a misdemeanor, and no matter how innocent you are, facing a jury on a felony charge is gambling. If someone on the casino side tampers with evidence, are you still confident? Vegas is a “company town,” and you would face an uphill battle all the way. Even finding experts to testify in your defense is difficult, because many of the experts either want to retain their anonymity for playing purposes, or they now do casino consulting, and will not “betray” their new taskmasters. Even if you want to fight, and are confident that you’ll ultimately win, a trial process of a year or longer is stressful and costly.

The Phoenix

I won’t tell you my decision to that hypothetical. In the end, we never had to answer. The May court date came and went, and the charges were never filed by the District Attorney. I guess the DA is not interested in fabricated cases. Perhaps he didn’t want to face our Dream Team of Bill Terry, Richard Wright, Robert Loeb, and Lawyer X. It cost us $23,000 to retain the four lawyers through the Pre-Trial Hearing. The Pre-Trial Hearing never occurred, so I guess that’s the best money we ever spent. So much for my muffin.

In the interrogation, I think the GCB agents thought that an academic would be easily intimidated. Perhaps they thought that handcuffs and jail would chase me out of the game forever. What do you think?

Afterward: Lessons

There’s a moral to every parable. This one has many. The great irony of casino countermeasures and intimidation tactics is that they often backfire and lead to innovations by players. As a player, I am so much more dangerous now. As a teacher, perhaps I’m more dangerous still. I will share the lessons that I took away from this incident, but you must decide what is relevant to your own circumstances. The lessons are both from the things we did right, and the things we did wrong.

  1. Memorize the local numbers for a lawyer and for some friends. If these friends have access to cash, so much the better. Your cash will be confiscated.
  2. While I don’t want casino personnel to see my ID, I do want the police at CCDC to see my ID, to avoid being booked as a John Doe. There is a way to have your cake and eat it, too. Contact me if you want to know.
  3. If you carry lots of cash and chips, realize that this gives the casino personnel, GCB, and LVPD more loot to confiscate and steal. Also, an inventory of chips tells GCB agents other casinos where you’ve been playing. (In my case, the funny thing was that while I had chips from casinos throughout Vegas, I had barely played at any of them on that trip. Some of the chips were from over a year earlier. I wonder if the GCB guys wasted time checking these other places.) There’s a tradeoff here, because carrying an inventory of chips and cash facilitates play. The game sometimes demands spontaneity.
  4. Hold the cards as gingerly as possible, using only one hand, so that the GCB cannot accuse you of bending (cheating). It’s probably best to pick up the cards in the middle. Put them down so that it’s clear that the corners are not jamming the table.
  5. Do not hold anything in your hand, not even money or chips. When I was paid a purple chip for winning a big hand, I held it in my hand. In interrogating me, the GCB agents wanted to know what was in my hand, insinuating that I had a cheating device! Don’t assume that the tape will show what’s in your hand. They may have the wrong angle; they may be focusing on your partner; they may not be zoomed in enough. In this case, I don’t know what it looked like on tape, but I wouldn’t at all put it past these GCB guys to tell a jury that the object in my hand is most likely a cheating device in their “expert opinion.”
  6. Your partner’s heat comes down on you. There is no doubt in my mind that we were arrested because my partner was libelously listed in the Griffin book. I knew this, and it was my choice to play with him. In the future, I would think carefully about whether it’s worth playing with someone so hot. Or, at least, if I think we should leave a casino, and he wants to keep playing, I’ll leave without him.
  7. Even if GCB gets involved, don’t say anything to them. When they said they wanted to interrogate us, I assumed that they were trying to make an objective decision about whether to arrest us. I agreed to be interrogated, because I assumed that these were honest people. I was wrong. The decision to arrest us had already been made, but they were hoping to get some dirt to hang us. Anything you say can and will be used (and twisted) against you. And, they will ignore things you say that do not suit their purpose. They’ll threaten to take you to CCDC. So what? You’re going there anyway, and if you have ID, you’ll be out of there in 12 hours.
  8. If they ask you where else you have played, don’t answer. Of course, you shouldn’t be talking to them at all.
  9. If they ask you where you are staying, don’t answer. If it’s a hotel, they’ll just call up that joint and get you barred there. If it’s your friend’s house, they’ll use that to try to fabricate a “conspiracy” case.
  10. Don’t get flustered if they say, “Your partner said [this] and your partner said [that].” They will lie about what your partner said, in an attempt to intimidate you, fluster you, trick you. They used this ploy with us, lying to Mike about what I had said (I said I had slept on his couch, but they told him that I said I slept at a casino hotel. They didn’t even ask me how I got to the Strip from the airport, but they told Mike that I had said he picked me up.) Unfortunately, it is legal for them to lie during interrogations, so you should expect it. Of course, you should not allow them to interrogate you.
  11. When you get released from CCDC, count everything before you sign. When they steal your money, you still will be powerless, but I’m curious to see what their story will be at that point. In my case, they had no story to explain the missing $2000, nor did they accuse me of hiding it; they merely said that I signed the sheet, so I had no legitimate complaint. So, next time, I want to hear their story when you count before signing.
  12. Don’t talk much in jail.
  13. Don’t eat food touched by other prisoners. One guy in our holding tank had hepatitis.
  14. Even if you are jailed with a partner, hire one lawyer for the initial stages. If the DA never files the charges, you will have saved money by not hiring too many lawyers. If the DA does file charges, there will be plenty of time to hire additional lawyers once the Pre-Trial Hearing is scheduled, or even after that. We jumped the gun in this regard. The process is quite slow. If you end up having to go to trial, then don’t skimp on your legal defense, but don’t get too ahead of yourself thinking about a trial and juries and the like. That’s a lot of unnecessary stress and money. Small steps — small steps.
  15. If an incident like this does happen, don’t let it deter you from playing. Most places are not like Caesars. Don’t be paranoid. If you play wisely, you can minimize this risk. Just know that it can happen. ♠