This post is syndicated by the Las Vegas Advisor for the 888 casino group. Anthony Curtis comments on the 888 article introduced and linked to on this page.
Continue reading Blackjack XchangeTag: Blackjack Ball
Colin Jones (S1 E2): The Devil is Mr. Jones
For the amount of vitriol directed at Colin Jones online, you’d think the man eats babies. In reality, he’s guilty of a far greater sin—he wrote a card-counting book, The 21st-Century Card Counter. That book is one pillar of a viral card-counting enterprise also supported by the documentary movie Holy Rollers, the website blackjackapprenticeship.com (BJA), and the in-person boot camps offered from time to time. Before I continue with the multi-part book review I began in my last post, let me address the mild controversy surrounding the book’s author, Mr. Jones (“Jones”? Really?).
As a disclaimer, let me say that other than reading CJ’s book, I have no connection whatsoever to the BJA empire. I’ve never attended a boot camp, and I know CJ only from meeting him a few times at Max Rubin’s annual Blackjack Ball. I won’t bother to start with the perfunctory, empty statement, “He’s a really nice guy,” because that definition of “nice” carries no weight with me. I’ve known friendly talkers who would buy you coffee or pick you up from the airport, but still abuse you and steal six or seven figures from you, so what does “nice” really mean, anyway? But since you asked about CJ, yeah, he’s a really nice guy.
Continue reading Colin Jones (S1 E2): The Devil is Mr. JonesCoronavirus V: The Blackjack Call
The Blackjack Ball, an annual get-together of professional gamblers, was historically hosted by Max Rubin over New Year’s, when the big card-counting teams would create their own fireworks all over Vegas. It was great fun while it lasted. But New Year’s became a victim of its own success. Vegas is so crowded on holiday weekends that getting a room, a parking spot, or a seat at a blackjack table is almost impossible, and certainly more trouble than it’s worth. And, the big-team model went extinct. The Uston team is no more (though some of its original players are still out there). The Czech team isn’t even a distant memory. The MIT team lives on only in the movies. Do any of the Greeks even play anymore? Hyland’s old gang is mostly doing other stuff. The Holy Rollers are now a decentralized swarm of counting zombies.
With no more counting teams to accommodate, The Blackjack Ball these days is scheduled to avoid the chaos of New Year’s. But the pandemic brought a whole new type of chaos. While the casinos probably would have loved to see a hundred of the world’s top APs (who are mostly 50+ years old) wiped out by a single superspreader event, it was not in the cards for 2021.
Continue reading Coronavirus V: The Blackjack CallThe 24th Annual Blackjack Ball
Recently in Las Vegas, more than 60 of the sharpest blackjack players from around the world, with a few other successful gamblers invited as well, got together with their guests for an evening of socializing, drinking champagne, and competing against each other. We voted to select the newest member of the Blackjack Hall of Fame. The last man standing in the skills contest won the Grosjean Cup. The names of both of these winners will be recognizable to most of my readers.
The ballot for the Blackjack Hall of Fame, alphabetized by first name, included Anthony Curtis, Blair Hull, Cat Hulbert, Lance Humble, Maria “The Greek,” Mark Billings, Mike Michalek, Norm Wattenberger, and Richard Dougherty.
Continue reading The 24th Annual Blackjack BallThe Twenty-Third Annual Blackjack Ball
The Blackjack Ball is an annual institution where about 100 of the world’s best gamblers meet up, socialize, drink too much, and compete against each other. The 2019 version occurred a few weeks ago.
The first order of business after two hours of drinking and socializing was to vote for the newest member of the Blackjack Hall of Fame. Six worthy candidates were nominated, and each professional player got one vote — with Hall of Fame members votes counting triple.
This year’s winner was Rob Reitzen. This is the way Rob was listed on the ballot.
There are few, if any, players that have won more money in the history of Blackjack than Rob Reitzen. From simple card counting to shuffle tracking/sequencing to bottom steering to advanced computer play, Rob has beaten games in more innovative ways than most professional blackjack players even know to exist.
The founding partner of CORE, which went on to become the largest and most profitable player-banking operation in history, Rob was featured in an Esquire Magazine article in which thereporter followed him and watched him beat Caesars Palace in Las Vegas out of more than $500,000 while using a sequencing technique he dubbed “The Hammer” on a single weekend!
Rob’s acceptance speech was somewhat lengthy. Host Max Rubin quipped afterwards that Rob must have thought he had a chance to win so he wrote “War and Peace” to read just in case.
The highlight of the ball is the test of 21 Questions. The five top scores get invited into the skills contest. Of these five, one player is eliminated quickly.
There were three people there who were ineligible to play: James Grosjean, Richard Munchkin, and myself — albeit it for different reasons. James and Richard have each won three times and have been determined to be “too good.” The first-place winner gets the Grosjean trophy, and the second-place winner gets the Munchkin cup.
The winner also gets an engraved Nebuchadnezzar (15 liters) of Luc Belaire Champagne, donated by Hall of Fame member Don Johnson who is an ambassador for that company.
I got included on this list for an entirely different reason as my blackjack career was short and uneventful. Although I did get to the final table at the Blackjack Ball once, I blew out immediately and didn’t end up in the money.
My contribution is that I submit a LOT of test questions. I submitted about 30 questions this year and they actually used seven or eight of my questions, depending on how you count. Since host Max Rubin has been a bit under the weather, he doesn’t have the time and energy to create as many questions as he used to and he’s grateful to me for supplying some. And, since taking a test where I had submitted a third of the questions would hardly be fair to the others, I’m not eligible to play. That’s cool. I get a kick out of composing questions that stump some of the smartest gamblers in the world — while other such gamblers get the questions correct.
Before the competition, we have a Calcutta auction. Host Max Rubin is a very charming auctioneer. He groups each of the 100 or so contestants into about 20 categories and we bid on who is going to win. Max teases, cajoles, insults, and praises various people in the audience in order to get them to bid. About $20,000 is raised and this goes to whomever owns the players who end up in the top four positions. Each player is allowed to buy up to 50% of himself back after the Calcutta and before the test is given.
The test is difficult — and questions can be about anything and everything. Some of the more interesting ones were:
- You are betting $100 on the pass line and place maximum odds at the Bellagio where 3-4-5 odds are allowed. On winning bets, what is the typical payout for the combination of pass line bet plus the odds?
Answer: $700 — $100 for the pass line and $600 for the odds
- Donald Trump is the 45th American president. Express the number forty-five in roman numerals.
Answer: XLV — this is not trivial. Many will say VL, which is incorrect
- In a National Basketball Association game, with 0.2 seconds left, the ball is out-of-bounds in possession of the team trailing by 2 points. The inbounding player throws the ball directly at the basket — and the ball would indeed have gone in except one of the inbounder’s teammates gently touches the ball when it is directly above the basket, 12 inches from going in. The teammate guides the ball into the basket. What happens?
- The inbounding team scores three points and wins the game
- The inbounding team scores two points and sends the game into overtime
- The inbounding team is guilty of offensive goal-tending, which causes them to lose possession and the game
- 0.2 seconds is not enough time for any of this to happen, so time runs out before any points are scored or there’s a change in possession
(Answer b: offensive goal-tending only occurs when the shot originated within the field of play. Since this “shot” originated from out-of-bounds, offensive goal tending could not happen.
Although the play originally began beyond the 3-point-line, the fact that the ball was touched directly above the basket turns this into a 2-point play.
The clock doesn’t start until the ball is touched by a player within the field of play — which in this case happened when the ball was one foot above the basket headed downward. 0.2 seconds is plenty of time for the basket to be made before the clock runs out.)
Those questions were three of the ones submitted by me, so naturally I think they are some of the most interesting. Here is one submitted by James Grosjean.
- Playing six deck blackjack where the dealer stands on soft 17, which of the following starting positions has the highest EV.
- You have a hard 20 against a dealer ace before he checks for blackjack.
- You have an 11 versus a dealer 5
- You have a pair of aces against a dealer 4.
- You have a ten and a nine against a dealer 8
(Answer: the exact numbers were given at the Ball, but the correct answer is a.)
One of the professional players only got four out of 21 questions correct. He was invited forward to receive a small “World’s Worst Blackjack Player.” The teasing was good natured, but he definitely got razzed.
The player with the most correct, 14, was Andy Bloch, former member of the MIT blackjack team and also an accomplished poker professional. Two players got 13 correct: Gemlo and Big Player. Since they want to be identified by their pseudonyms, I won’t identify them any further.
Coming in at 12 correct were four players: Arnold Snyder, John Brahms, Tony S, and attorney Bob Nersesian. Since only five players advance to the final game, we had to eliminate two of these four players. The way this was done was each of these four people had to name a casino that was formerly in Clark County but is here no more. Giving an incorrect answer, or a duplicate, eliminated you. There were probably fifty casinos named (e.g. Stardust, Riviera, Dunes, Landmark, Las Vegas Club, etc., etc. and finally Arnold Snyder and John Brahms gave incorrect answers and were eliminated.
On to the skills competition, which is held at a blackjack table. There was a stack of cards in the discard tray. Each of the five contestants needed to estimate the number of cards there. Worst guesser was eliminated — which happened to be Big Player. We were then down to four players.
Next test was a card-cutting competition. The 6♣ was placed at the bottom of the deck. Each player got to cut the cards. Munchkin then burned a card and dealt any number of hands that player named (from 1 to 7), with the object being to place the 6♣ face down in the dealer’s hand, e.g. as the dealer’s hole card.
The players all chose to deal six hands. Unfortunately, Andy Bloch cut the card four spaces away and was eliminated.
The third test was very unusual and was designed by James Grosjean. JG cut approximately one-inch squares out of the center of all twelve picture cards. Players had 90 seconds to figure out the rank and suits of each of the squares. Positive points were awarded for being accurate. Negative scores were awarded for inaccuracy. The mean score was negative! Gemlo did the worst and was eliminated.
It was now down to Tony S and Bob Nersesian and the contest was counting down a double deck. Richard Munchkin, who was running the final contest, removed three cards from each of the two deck stacks. The players had to determine what those cards were, using any card counting system they wanted.
Unfortunately, Bob Nersesian has never counted cards, whereas Tony S was a highly skilled professional for a number of years. Bob’s only chance was a wild guess. As soon as the clock started, he should have slammed his cards down and predicted his three cards would have a count of zero in HiLo. He would win if there were three neutral cards, or one high, one low, and one neutral. He had a reasonable chance for success, whereas if he actually tried to count the double deck, he had basically no chance. There are actually better counts to use if you’re just going to guess, but Bob wouldn’t know about this.
Bob chose the wrong way to go about it. He tried to count the cards and ended up almost a minute behind Tony. Tony was accurate in his count, of course, and it was over. Although it didn’t matter, we asked Bob what he thought the count was in his deck. He said +6, which is an impossible number with only three cards using HiLo. Bob is a hell of an attorney but has never counted cards.
Congratulations to all our winners. We hope to have Rob Reitzen, Tony S, and Max Rubin on our podcast soon celebrating the twenty-third Blackjack Ball.
2016 Blackjack Ball
Once a year for the past 20 years, the finest blackjack players in the world get together for an evening of drinking, visiting, drinking, dining, drinking, and testing themselves against one another. The event is hosted by wit and raconteur Max Rubin with some help from Barona Casino. A few lawyers and other gambling professionals are also invited, including one grateful video poker writer and teacher. Continue reading 2016 Blackjack Ball
Attending the 2015 Blackjack Ball — Part II of II
This is the second part of a story about this year’s Blackjack Ball. If you didn’t read last week’s installment, check it out here
The game of 21 Questions as devised by Max Rubin is very difficult. Success requires some specific knowledge, often some mathematical ability, and a lot of fortuitous guessing. In 2013, I won this part of the competition (only to blow out quickly in the skills contest). In 2014, my guessing hat must have been on backwards and I didn’t do well at all. In 2015, I barely missed qualifying for the finals. In fact, if I had only correctly answered the question that I had submitted, I would have advanced to the skills contest. I’ll soon describe how this happened. Continue reading Attending the 2015 Blackjack Ball — Part II of II
Attending the 2015 Blackjack Ball — Part I of II
Every year, somewhere in Las Vegas, there’s a gathering of blackjack professionals, past and present, along with some gambling attorneys and a few other miscellaneous gambling professionals, including one video poker writer. Predominantly male, many bring wives or dates, but most come alone. Perhaps it speaks poorly of how often I get out of the house, but it’s a high point of my social calendar. The 2015 version of this event occurred recently. Continue reading Attending the 2015 Blackjack Ball — Part I of II
18th Annual Blackjack Ball — Part 2 of 2
This is a continuation article. To revisit Part 1, click here
The winner of the blackjack skills competition wins the Grosjean Cup, named after three-time winner James Grosjean. Runner-up gets the smaller Munchkin Award, named after my co-host, who also won three times but took longer to do so and is also a bit shorter.
Continue reading 18th Annual Blackjack Ball — Part 2 of 2
