Posted on 17 Comments

Coronavirus IV: Rats!

I am Charlie Brown to The Rat’s Lucy van Pelt. When The Rat guest-blogged that the re-opening of casinos could bring a uniquely juicy opportunity for APs, I was skeptical. I told Anthony Curtis, “So surveillance has a little more work, but that doesn’t turn a sweatshop into a candy store.” I made a verbose blog post saying the same thing, dismissing masked avengers as a fantasy, based on my decades battling casinos as a real-world AP on the front lines (I’m not expecting APs to be called “heroes” anytime soon). Despite the bombast, there was a tiny piece of me—maybe 1%—that thought: “Maybe I’m wrong this time [winking-with-tongue-out emoji here, ok?]. Could past experience be irrelevant in this bizarre, coronavirus world?”

Nah. (And yes, I adjectivized “coronavirus”—that just happened.) To be fair, the casino conditions are changing, and will affect APs in different ways. From my point of view, scouting has now confirmed that overall conditions are garbage compared to the pre-lockdown world, and I feel like a gullible fool for hoping I could kick the football (https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/trevin-wax/charlie-brown-lucy-and-the-football-50-years-of-funny/). While my previous blog post was speculative, I can now reiterate using actual observations, consolidated from scouts in diverse locales in the US.

Continue reading Coronavirus IV: Rats!
Posted on 21 Comments

Coronavirus III: Eyes Wide Shut

Fifteen years ago, when most of the AP discussion was consolidated on Stanford Wong’s Green Chip page, there was a recurring conjecture, posed by naïvely optimistic card counters: When a butterfly flaps its wings in China, penetration increases in Vegas. For example, one person would make a post saying that the US had just signed a treaty banning military research on biological weapons, and the next poster would say, “So penetration is going to increase!” The Rube Goldbergian logic would go something like this: If we ban bio research in the US, the virus labs will move to foreign countries, especially China; without proper ethical and safety regulations, a virus will escape a Chinese lab; the ensuing worldwide pandemic will shut down casinos throughout the US; after two months without revenue, the US casinos will be desperate for cash when they re-open; to entice Americans to travel to the petri dish that is the Strip, Vegas will have to offer something that locals casinos throughout the US cannot; previously, Vegas casinos would offer fabulous shows, nightclubs, restaurants, roller coasters, strippers, and delirious nights spent shoulder-to-shoulder at the crap table with other like-minded tourists; with social-distancing guidelines shutting down nightclubs, spas, restaurants, and debauchery, Vegas will have to find some other way to make the game attractive; ergo, they’ll increase the penetration!

You had me till “ergo”! The conjecture requires three assumptions: that casino executives know what penetration is, that gamblers care what penetration is, and that casinos will compete with each other using penetration. In my decades as a pro, I still haven’t figured out which of those three assumptions is the most ridiculous. For a few inexperienced players to share their daydreams online was less annoying than the silence of the experienced majority. By failing to call out misinformation online, knowledgeable players allow idiocy to fester online. Of course, sometimes that is our goal.

Continue reading Coronavirus III: Eyes Wide Shut
Posted on 22 Comments

The Green Chip War

In a Gambling with an Edge podcast, two card counters—“Joe” and “Semi-Pro”—tell the story of a chop disagreement. I am only a listener to the podcast, with no inside knowledge, so my comments will undoubtedly misstate their positions. Pretend this discussion is based on a fictional incident. My points still apply. Part of the difficulty in running an AP team or real-world relationship is disagreements over money. To recap the fictional scenario: During her play, Semi-Pro had gone to a table where a gambler asked her to wait a few hands before joining. When the gambler’s lucky streak ended, he thanked Semi-Pro by toking her $25. The senior teammate Joe, a grizzled veteran of the EV wars, thinks that the green chip should be part of the team chop. [At that point Marlo Stanfield called in to the show to relate his experience as a rookie counter on Joe’s team: “I wanted it to be one way, but Joe told me it’s the other way.”]

Now comes Semi-Pro, giddy at $25 of UV (unexpected value) derived from her unique skills (the skills that cause gamblers—especially older males—to say, “So you’re telling me there’s a chance”), outside the scope of the team mandate to count cards. By her position, it was only incidental that the $25 even came in a casino, and the profit should accrue to her the same as if a flirtatious barista had given her a free latte at the coffee shop earlier in the day. That chip has nothing to do with the team chop.

Continue reading The Green Chip War
Posted on 5 Comments

Lessons from Chip Reese

I was reading Mike Sexton’s new book, Life’s a Gamble, in preparation for interviewing Sexton on the radio. The Sexton interview will be taped before you read this and will be posted here (that link is to the filtered podcast archives) on Thursday, July 28. The book is autobiographical, with lots of anecdotes about Sexton himself and various other players. I already knew many of the stories (I read a LOT about gambling and have interviewed many players over the years), but many more were new to me. All in all, it’s a good read and of interest to any gambler, not just poker players. Continue reading Lessons from Chip Reese