Ahh, . . . the Romance of, . . .

Originally posted by: MisterPicture

Then you didn't read the title of his post.

 

Right-wingers have devolved into such filth that if 9/11 happened today, they would joke that New York buildings were just too tall.


Trumpers are happy that all those liberals in NYC are dying. Our local scum are using NYC's agony as "proof" that Covid-19 is a liberal disease.

 

Rush Limbaugh said that it's called that because it's the 19th coronavirus. Actually, it's called that because it was discovered in 2019. 

 

There's no end to the disinformation, including bald-faced lies from our Asshole in Chief. A large part of that false narrative is Trump blaming NYC for the coronavirus, in order to justify his stupid, petty feud with Cuomo and withhold medical supplies.

 

Our Trumpers fully support this petty, evil, murderous bastard. Shame on their black souls.

  Kevin you really are sick.

Not as sick as what you do with your trumpy bear, David.

Creepy.

Kevin, the sickness is more prevelent in NY City because of policy put in place by a Liberal. 


Originally posted by: Boilerman

Kevin, the sickness is more prevelent in NY City because of policy put in place by a Liberal. 


AND maybe because the population density is about 26,000 per square mile. Not exactly social distancing, huh?

 

But it's no reason for dishonest people to present this as a false choice. It's possible to believe that BOTH the leader of New York City and the leader of the United States behaved badly, resulting in more dead Americans.

 

Fair?

Originally posted by: MisterPicture

AND maybe because the population density is about 26,000 per square mile. Not exactly social distancing, huh?

 

But it's no reason for dishonest people to present this as a false choice. It's possible to believe that BOTH the leader of New York City and the leader of the United States behaved badly, resulting in more dead Americans.

 

Fair?


Mister is actually arguing that policy in NY City had no effect on death numbers?  I have encouraged all along that government open up a fully unrestricted economy, but I've never said that this would not lead to more deaths.  Hell, I'm 61 and willing to take the risk to get our economy on the mend.

Originally posted by: Boilerman

Mister is actually arguing that policy in NY City had no effect on death numbers?  I have encouraged all along that government open up a fully unrestricted economy, but I've never said that this would not lead to more deaths.  Hell, I'm 61 and willing to take the risk to get our economy on the mend.


Take another swipe at reading what I wrote, okay?

 

It's possible to believe that BOTH the leader of New York City and the leader of the United States behaved badly, resulting in more dead Americans.

And it is possible to belive that the leader of New York City behaved badly , causing unnecessary many thousands of deaths, while the President has behaved responsibly, saving hundreds of thousands of lives. This is a true statement, backed up with unrefutable facts.

Edited on Apr 21, 2020 5:44am

Bullshit followed by "this is a true statement" is still bullshit. Stalker knows that his statements are weak and therefore feels the need to append "DIS IS DA TROOT!!!" to them.

 

And it's "irrefutable," by the way.

Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now