Do your best to figure out who's intelligence department confirmed that the US was behind this killing. What a horrible rag that Liberals love.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/al-qaidas-no-2-accused-151041953.html
Do your best to figure out who's intelligence department confirmed that the US was behind this killing. What a horrible rag that Liberals love.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/al-qaidas-no-2-accused-151041953.html
Only a fool prefers right-wing propaganda sites to a renowned and respected news source like the New York Times.
If Boilerman doesn't like the New York Times, I'm wondering what news media he recommends.
Please inform us all.
I'm sure that Q-Anon publishes a newsletter.
What country's intelligence department confirmed that the US was behind the killing?
What a horrible agenda driven rag.
What alt-right website did you learn the term "agenda-driven" from? Just so you know, it's stupidly inaccurate.
Originally posted by: MisterPicture
If Boilerman doesn't like the New York Times, I'm wondering what news media he recommends.
Please inform us all.
Second request.
Originally posted by: MisterPicture
Second request.
Any "source" that "reports" only things that he agrees with.
So, you doubt the veracity of the New York Times--yet you are a faithful believer in the Goebbels-level propaganda arm that is Fox News? You enthusiastically support a president who blatantly lies everyday, yet you doubt The Times? You question the honesty of national elections, yet slavishly accept the ravings of a tin-pot internet crank, which Trump is about to become. Such stated opinions gives us a wonderful insight into your judgment and intellect--not complementary to you.
I'm struggling to understand what the "agenda" might be in the article.
It claims Al Queada's number 2 was assisnated by Israeli's working with the US.
The US administration, Israeli admnistration, and Iranian administration refuse to comment.
What part does Boilerman object to....and what part does he believe is some kind of "agenda" that is not accurate?