Originally posted by: PJ Stroh
I'm struggling to understand what the "agenda" might be in the article.
It claims Al Queada's number 2 was assisnated by Israeli's working with the US.
The US administration, Israeli admnistration, and Iranian administration refuse to comment.
What part does Boilerman object to....and what part does he believe is some kind of "agenda" that is not accurate?
Don't look for logic in Boilerboob's rants. He just woke up this morning, his piles were acting up, and he seized on the first thing he saw when he fired up his alt-right propaganda network.
Of course we all know, Republicans don't have an agenda. (hearty laughter)