All of the people Jerry and Charles get their information from take their cues from Dr Fauci - at least in their own personal lives. Trump, Tucker, Hannity.....none of them took Ivermectin or thought the vaccine was some kind of Dr Jekyl / Mr Hyde concoction used to brainwash QaNon retards.
But what they do in their personal lives and what they feed their base are two different things. And that doesnt seem to be a problem for their fans. FUnny, aint it ?
I'm not talking about any of those people Peej. I've taken the vaccines as well. I think for myself, unlike most brain dead liberals. All Charles is doing is pointing out how inconsistent your liberal arguments and stances are as always.
One question: So are you saying, on record, Fauci and CDC are credible sources? I just want to get this straight.
Originally posted by: Jerry Ice 33
I'm not talking about any of those people Peej. I've taken the vaccines as well. I think for myself, unlike most brain dead liberals. All Charles is doing is pointing out how inconsistent your liberal arguments and stances are as always.
One question: So are you saying, on record, Fauci and CDC are credible sources? I just want to get this straight.
Yes, they are. Thanks for asking.
And thats not to say they always get it right. Its a new disease and each variant brings it own compexities and consequences. If the CDC and Dr Fauci change their rhetoric its because the information about the virus has changed - not that they are playing politics. And since when is Dr Fauci and the CDC agents of some kind of "liberal hack" partisan group?
They've served faithfully under presidents from both sides of the aisle for decades. Fauci didnt become politized until he disagreed with our last president who didnt wear masks and purposefully tried to hide the severity of the outbreak for political reasons.
You claim to think for yourself but you spout the same drively Tucker does on this topic.
A lot of Newton's theories were contradicted by Einstein. And Einstein was subsequently contradicted by quantum mechanics. Science, you know, evolves.
Were Newton and Einstein credible sources? You could only answer "no" if you lacked understanding, class, integrity, and... well hello, Jerry!
Originally posted by: Jerry Ice 33
Like I said, wood shed for Kevin.
Funny how now Covid isn't a President's issue and now it is so hard to contain. I must have missed those posts 18 months ago from you. Oh wait, no I didn't. I'm not saying this is Joe's fault, just like it wasn't Trump's fault. But I do remember Kevin talking up Fauci. I mean if you can't now see that guy is so full of shit, you never will. (and I'm sure you never will) CDC telling me something is taken like Mickey Mouse at Disney telling me how to invest. Is there a more irrelevant organization than the CDC right now? Do they have a spec of credibility at this point?
Jerry, you're babbling like a complete fool. And when the country's foremost pandemic expert says one thing, and you say another, I'm not going to believe YOU.
Originally posted by: Jerry Ice 33
I'm not talking about any of those people Peej. I've taken the vaccines as well. I think for myself, unlike most brain dead liberals. All Charles is doing is pointing out how inconsistent your liberal arguments and stances are as always.
One question: So are you saying, on record, Fauci and CDC are credible sources? I just want to get this straight.
Charles is stupid. I mean, really, really, really fucking stupid. But you're not. That's why your supposed lack of understanding of how science works is so appalling.
The pandemic has been an evolving event. Fauci, the CDC, and thousands of other experts have changed their statements over the course of the pandemic because the pandemic itself has changed several times. New data have become available, and the meaning of prior data has changed.
That's what science does. That's what science is. Science allows for the possibility of new information changing prior conclusions. Science says, when warranted, OK, this is what we knew before but this is what we know now. Science uses theories rather than stating absolutes.
And you, Jerry, and your ilk misinterpret that as "weakness," or "prevarication," or even "lying." You want everything to be absolutely certain, black or white, and if a scientist changes his viewpoint on something, you think that means he didn't know what he was talking about in the first place.
And sadly, LOTS of people think the way you do and as a result, are rabidly anti-science. It's not something you or Charles should be proud of.
Originally posted by: MisterPicture
A lot of Newton's theories were contradicted by Einstein. And Einstein was subsequently contradicted by quantum mechanics. Science, you know, evolves.
Were Newton and Einstein credible sources? You could only answer "no" if you lacked understanding, class, integrity, and... well hello, Jerry!
Jerry is comically out of his depth when discussing science.
The other day, I read a quote from Fauci. He was talking about using science AND economic realities (paraphrasing) when setting Covid policy. When Trump argued for such a well rounded view of our situation, Liberals called him an idiot.
Liberals suddenly agree with Trump's position from a year ago. Smart dude and it took Liberals this long to figure it out. As you guys know, I also argued to such a well rounded view on Covid policy long ago.
Originally posted by: Boilerman
The other day, I read a quote from Fauci. He was talking about using science AND economic realities (paraphrasing) when setting Covid policy. When Trump argued for such a well rounded view of our situation, Liberals called him an idiot.
Liberals suddenly agree with Trump's position from a year ago. Smart dude and it took Liberals this long to figure it out. As you guys know, I also argued to such a well rounded view on Covid policy long ago.
No, you said to completely open up the economy in the context of there being no vaccine and morgues overflowing with corpses infected with Covid. Neither of those variables is in place today, is it?
positions can evolve as the environment does. It doesn't make the one you had a year ago remotely rational.
Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis
Charles is stupid. I mean, really, really, really fucking stupid. But you're not. That's why your supposed lack of understanding of how science works is so appalling.
The pandemic has been an evolving event. Fauci, the CDC, and thousands of other experts have changed their statements over the course of the pandemic because the pandemic itself has changed several times. New data have become available, and the meaning of prior data has changed.
That's what science does. That's what science is. Science allows for the possibility of new information changing prior conclusions. Science says, when warranted, OK, this is what we knew before but this is what we know now. Science uses theories rather than stating absolutes.
And you, Jerry, and your ilk misinterpret that as "weakness," or "prevarication," or even "lying." You want everything to be absolutely certain, black or white, and if a scientist changes his viewpoint on something, you think that means he didn't know what he was talking about in the first place.
And sadly, LOTS of people think the way you do and as a result, are rabidly anti-science. It's not something you or Charles should be proud of.
Alrighty then. More insults and personal attacks from Kevin. That's what really, really, really, really fucking stupid people do when they can't make an argument. Did Kevin say he taught 2nd grade or was in second grade? Sorry Keviepoo. But I will not have sex with you no matter how much you beg me. I'm just wondering which of his 57 genders Kevie's playing today. Are you a 'He' or a 'They'? Sadly, that's the kind of science Kevin buys into..
