''Why would Putin or any Russian in authority feel they could increase the killing with a bounty?''
Uhhh.... Because Putin is STILL KGB?
''Why would Putin or any Russian in authority feel they could increase the killing with a bounty?''
Uhhh.... Because Putin is STILL KGB?
Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis
You don't deserve an answer, but here's one anyway. The report didn't say there WAS no evidence; it said that they FOUND no evidence. A distinction you may be too dense to understand.
This is not surprising in light of Trump's eleven separate instances of felony obstruction of justice in trying, successfully, to impede the investigation. The report detailed these Trump crimes and noted that only his office shielded him from prosecution.
I've explained this to you before. So to answer your question, no, the report did NOT say that.
Liberals spent two years and $30 million and couldn't find a shread of proof, yet Kevin argues that there is evidence. Those Liberal politicians must be extremely stupid if there is evidence and they couldn't find it.
Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis
Reprehensible that Charles, etc. spring to the defense of a traitor. I love my country. You Trumpers hate it and support a President who is more loyal to Russia than to America. Shame on you all, traitor Trumper scum.
If you loved your country Kevin, you would ask not what your country can do for you. You would instead ask what you can do for your country. Kevin asks "How much free shit can I get".
Originally posted by: Boilerman
Liberals spent two years and $30 million and couldn't find a shread of proof, yet Kevin argues that there is evidence. Those Liberal politicians must be extremely stupid if there is evidence and they couldn't find it.
Was the full unredacted report released? Were all the principals involved allowed to give testimony?
Until then...... I guess it's still a *president not exonerated from the crimes that he and his gang of criminals were accused of.
Oh, and I'll might mention, he was eventually impeached.
Once he's out of office, the whole, ugly truth of what he did will come out.
Originally posted by: Boilerman
If you loved your country Kevin, you would ask not what your country can do for you. You would instead ask what you can do for your country. Kevin asks "How much free shit can I get".
I have never asked that. And unlike you, I have never supported a traitor.
There is no excuse for your treason.
Originally posted by: Boilerman
If you loved your country Kevin, you would ask not what your country can do for you. You would instead ask what you can do for your country. Kevin asks "How much free shit can I get".
I have never asked that. And unlike you, I have never supported a traitor.
There is no excuse for your treason.
Update about this lie -The U.S. Intelligence Community has yet to corroborate reports of a Russian bounty killing scheme targeting American soldiers.
Defense Secretary Mark Esper and Gen. Mark Milley, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, appeared before the House Armed Services Committee on Thursday to testify over the alleged Russian operation. The senior administration officials told lawmakers that the bounty scheme has not been confirmed or connected to the deaths of any US troops.
“All the defense intelligence agencies have been unable to corroborate that report,” Esper told the committee, according to ABC News.
“As of today, right now, we don’t have cause and effect linkages to a Russian bounty program causing U.S. Military casualties,” Milley said. “However, we are still looking. We’re not done. We’re going to run this thing to ground.”
“If it is bounties, I am outraged, just like every one of us in uniform is,” Milley continued, promising retribution if such a program is found to exist. “If these bounties are directed by the government of Russia to kill American soldiers, that is a big deal. We don’t have that level of fidelity yet. We are still looking.”
The New York Times originally reported the alleged Russian bounty scheme in a June 26 article that claimed President Trump was briefed on the matter earlier in the year. In a subsequent report, the newspaper backed off that claim and reported that information on the alleged Russian bounty scheme was included in a written briefing to the president in February.
In a July 3 report, the NYT noted that the operation, if it exists, was likely not approved by Russian President Vladimir Putin, though lower-level officials may have pushed the operation forward without his knowing.
“There is no evidence to date that Mr. Putin signed off on any program to kill American soldiers in Afghanistan, and even independent experts say they strongly doubt he would have done so,” the NYT reported.
Originally posted by: David Miller
Update about this lie -The U.S. Intelligence Community has yet to corroborate reports of a Russian bounty killing scheme targeting American soldiers.
Defense Secretary Mark Esper and Gen. Mark Milley, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, appeared before the House Armed Services Committee on Thursday to testify over the alleged Russian operation. The senior administration officials told lawmakers that the bounty scheme has not been confirmed or connected to the deaths of any US troops.
“All the defense intelligence agencies have been unable to corroborate that report,” Esper told the committee, according to ABC News.
“As of today, right now, we don’t have cause and effect linkages to a Russian bounty program causing U.S. Military casualties,” Milley said. “However, we are still looking. We’re not done. We’re going to run this thing to ground.”
“If it is bounties, I am outraged, just like every one of us in uniform is,” Milley continued, promising retribution if such a program is found to exist. “If these bounties are directed by the government of Russia to kill American soldiers, that is a big deal. We don’t have that level of fidelity yet. We are still looking.”
The New York Times originally reported the alleged Russian bounty scheme in a June 26 article that claimed President Trump was briefed on the matter earlier in the year. In a subsequent report, the newspaper backed off that claim and reported that information on the alleged Russian bounty scheme was included in a written briefing to the president in February.
In a July 3 report, the NYT noted that the operation, if it exists, was likely not approved by Russian President Vladimir Putin, though lower-level officials may have pushed the operation forward without his knowing.
“There is no evidence to date that Mr. Putin signed off on any program to kill American soldiers in Afghanistan, and even independent experts say they strongly doubt he would have done so,” the NYT reported.
Read it again. The Defense Secretary did NOT deny that the Russians placed bounties for dead American troops. He simply said that could not prove that it resulted in actual dead Americans.
And Trump's response: Nothing.
Trump is a traitor, and those who support him are traitors.
I would expect that Stalker, as a professed veteran (though we don't know for certain), would be outraged at Trump's dereliction of duty and disavow him.
Stalker also calls the information a "lie" even though he has no idea whether it is true or not. He will abandon any morality or decency he may have had just to defend his orange hero--Trump, the traitor, who does nothing when bounties are placed on American soldiers. Shame on Stalker.
How can one deny or affirm something that never happened? The investigation is ongoing, with still no confirmation to this lie. You need to reread the article. The President made his statement that he knew nothing about this lie. Does he have to comment weekly/daily/ on the hour and deny this lie to appease you?
