Seems to be an ethics violation and needs to be impeached now for that and his wife's criminal activity.
https://www.propublica.org/article/clarence-thomas-scotus-undisclosed-luxury-travel-gifts-crow
Seems to be an ethics violation and needs to be impeached now for that and his wife's criminal activity.
https://www.propublica.org/article/clarence-thomas-scotus-undisclosed-luxury-travel-gifts-crow
What did your expect from Justice Long Dong Silver?
I dont think there's many ethics rules regarding SUpreme COurt judges. The founding fathers didnt envision somebody with such low moral character being put into that role. Clarence Thomas and his fascist-Harpy wife was just something they couldnt fathom.
Congratulations Republicans.
Thomas is the perfect Republican--a traitorous asshole.
Despite his obvious intelligence, he believes all the standard RepubliQ wackadoodle shit. That's what the Fathers never saw coming. That someone would be that smart and shit on the Constitution. Not to mention his total lack of ethics.
So, it's true.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-65215407.amp
Originally posted by: David Miller
Under federal law, the nine justices are required to report their financial ties, including gifts, but there is an exemption for food, lodging, or entertainment received as “personal hospitality.” Justice Thomas said that the luxury travel provided by Mr. Crow fell under that exemption for personal hospitality. “Early in my tenure at the Court, I sought guidance from my colleagues and others in the judiciary, and was advised that this sort of personal hospitality from close personal friends, who did not have business before the Court, was not reportable,” the justice said. Justice Thomas noted that the disclosure obligations from all federal judges changed last month because of guidance issued by the Judicial Conference, an administrative agency that makes policy for the federal judiciary. Under the new regulations, judges must disclose certain benefits provided by friends, including stays at commercial properties and private jet trips. “These guidelines are now being changed, as the committee of the Judicial Conference responsible for financial disclosure for the entire federal judiciary just this past month announced new guidance,” the justice said. “And, it is, of course, my intent to follow this guidance in the future. --- https://www.wsj.com/articles/justice-clarence-thomas-defends-luxury-travel-paid-for-by-billionaire-gop-donor-4d3f22b0?fbclid=IwAR1IPjEw8GYb7-8kcAcrcV6gdNQAlsO4K8hnfYx1ZZVJNqo07AaUOLY8cdg
You are a raging hypocrite--yet again.
Under federal law, the nine justices are required to report their financial ties, including gifts, but there is an exemption for food, lodging, or entertainment received as “personal hospitality.” Justice Thomas said that the luxury travel provided by Mr. Crow fell under that exemption for personal hospitality. “Early in my tenure at the Court, I sought guidance from my colleagues and others in the judiciary, and was advised that this sort of personal hospitality from close personal friends, who did not have business before the Court, was not reportable,” the justice said. Justice Thomas noted that the disclosure obligations from all federal judges changed last month because of guidance issued by the Judicial Conference, an administrative agency that makes policy for the federal judiciary. Under the new regulations, judges must disclose certain benefits provided by friends, including stays at commercial properties and private jet trips. “These guidelines are now being changed, as the committee of the Judicial Conference responsible for financial disclosure for the entire federal judiciary just this past month announced new guidance,” the justice said. “And, it is, of course, my intent to follow this guidance in the future. --- https://www.wsj.com/articles/justice-clarence-thomas-defends-luxury-travel-paid-for-by-billionaire-gop-donor-4d3f22b0?fbclid=IwAR1IPjEw8GYb7-8kcAcrcV6gdNQAlsO4K8hnfYx1ZZVJNqo07AaUOLY8cdg
Originally posted by: Dealer1
You are a raging hypocrite--yet again.
Apparently YOU have a problem with comprehension - I 'll make it simple for you, Simpleton, he followed the existing guidelines after he was advised by the judicary. This never was an issue UNTIL new regulations were enacted. And for the record - what did I say that was hypocritical ?
Millerscum, while a raging idiot, doesn't genuinely fail to understand the nature of his hypocrisy.
Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis
Millerscum, while a raging idiot, doesn't genuinely fail to understand the nature of his hypocrisy.
Kevin, what has David said on this topic that is hypocritical? You want tell us because you have nothing.
