Kevin Lewis opines:
"They may ask their spouses--or their children---or their cats---for advice. That does not mean that those individuals actually participate in governance or policymaking."
I wonder if DonDiego's faux outrage extends to cities that are "run by" Republicans. Just for grins, it should be noted that the Republican Party does indeed keep its elected officials on a very, very short leash. The Democratic Party, not so much."
i. DonDiego has not expressed outrage, "faux" or otherwise, concerning with whom government officials may confer.
ii. DonDiego would expect any elected official, of any party, to confer occasionally or even daily with his citizenry, fellow members of those elected or appointed to govern the city, . . . as well as political affiliates. And with regard to the latter, the chief administrator would be more likely to confer with those within his own party than those not.
iii. Poor old DonDiego finds all the above to be natural and, hopefully, productive. Kevin Lewis's opinion that poor old DonDiego somehow finds such communication within a city administration, or any other level of government administration up to the Chief Executive of the United States to be inappropriste is inaccurate.
iv. All that said, it is possible that some communications of an administrator might, in fact, be nefarious; if so the public would be well-served to become aware of such goings-on; that is one of functions of reporters, hopefully politically-neutral reporters.