Current Numbers

Your "correlation" is asinine, and you know it. How does it feel to be proven wrong again, in front of everyone who posts here? Next time, get someone to read/explain what you are trying to read before making a fool out of yourself.

I don't want to get into the namecalling you engage in here with your boyfriends. But there's an easy way to test who is asinine:

 

"Correlation does not imply causation." Do you agree or disagree? 

 

(Psst, it's a trap!)

Grow up and accept that you are wrong, again.

Originally posted by: MisterPicture

I don't want to get into the namecalling you engage in here with your boyfriends. But there's an easy way to test who is asinine:

 

"Correlation does not imply causation." Do you agree or disagree? 

 

(Psst, it's a trap!)


That concept is much, much too deep for Stalker to understand. He tries to hide that fact by yelling at anyone who points it out. He's ignorant, plain and simple.

 

Correlation does not imply causation. You understand it. I understand it. Stalker doesn't understand it. And trying to explain it to him is like trying to get a hamster to read Shakespeare.

Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now