Liberals are treating her accusations as absolute gospel truth, for one reason and one reason only--in a desperate attempt to smear Kavanaugh and hopefully, ruin his chances of becomong a Supreme Court Justice. - Liberal hate. That's all it is.
Liberals are treating her accusations as absolute gospel truth, for one reason and one reason only--in a desperate attempt to smear Kavanaugh and hopefully, ruin his chances of becomong a Supreme Court Justice. - Liberal hate. That's all it is.
More Stalker plagiarism.
More truth that Kevin hates to be known.
Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis
Conservatives are treating her accusations as absolute gospel truth, for one reason and one reason only--in a desperate attempt to smear Joe Biden and hopefully, boost the Orange Asshole's election chances.
That's why all the Trumper bleating. They KNOW she's not credible and her story is flimsy. But they WISH she was believable.
Trump-love. That's all it is.
I don't think that the accusation of Ford or the accusations of Reade are true. They are equally believeable, yet the agenda driven media is largely ignoring the accustions on Biden.
That's why the Liberal media sucks. They don't even attempt to hide their agenda.
Originally posted by: Boilerman
I don't think that the accusation of Ford or the accusations of Reade are true. They are equally believeable, yet the agenda driven media is largely ignoring the accustions on Biden.
That's why the Liberal media sucks. They don't even attempt to hide their agenda.
Again, Ford testified before a live television national audience.
Reade won't even go on Fox News?
Maybe that's why there's a coverage disparity. What do you think?
Stay on topic boys. The discussion is the first 30 days out of the box. Virtually equal allegations with equal holes. Both refusing to go on TV the first month. Both refusing to testify the first month. One gets 100 time more attention from agenda driven media. We've proven this with data.
Kevin tells us that the coverage dispartity is because Kavanaugh was up for an important job, and Biden is only up for the presidency.
We all know why " there's a coverage disparity" - it does not fit the lying, liberal agenda.
Best I can tell, Ford never appeared on TV until the hearings. She refused to testify, and apparently refused to appear on television for approximately 80 days.
Now, stay on topic boys. We're talking about media coverage in the first month out of the box.
Hey! I just thought of something. What if most members of the media are somehow biased against President Trump? Maybe many of them think and act the same way as Mark, Kevin and Mr. Picture.
Maybe that's why they promoted Ford's accusations and are burying Tara's. Maybe they'll write anything...like accusing Tara of a crime based on some dude's blog just to discredit her. I know it's hard to believe, but it could be possible, eh?
Originally posted by: Boilerman
Tom, that is my point of my original post. During the first month after Kavanaugh was accused, Ford's name was mentioned 1,898 times by CNN, and MSNBC mentioned her name 1,878 times. In contrast, in the first month after the after Biden was accused, Read's name was mentions 15 times on CNN, and 10 times on MSNBC". Our resident Liberals tells us that we Conservatives only imagine how the agenda driven liberal media covers this stuff. Liberals should feel silly for following media with such an abvious bias.
Kevin confirms that Kavanaugh's coverage was more extensive because he was nominated for a very important job.
Did you make up those numbers Boilerman. If not, what is your source? (Fourth request)
