Originally posted by: MisterPicture
Did you make up those numbers Boilerman. If not, what is your source? (Fourth request)
Once again.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2020/04/29/biden_vs_kavanaugh_how_the_metoo_numbers_stack_up_143065.html
More discussion about the disparity in coverage.
https://www.easternecho.com/article/2020/05/the-tara-reade-controversy-is-rife-with-uncertainty-and-hypocrisy
You can scour the internet and find numerous "sources" to support any deranged point of view. It proves nothing.
You want to believe that the accusation against Biden is the most important issue in the world right now and therefore, any lack of coverage (in your mind) is due to the horrible biases of the LIBURRUL MEDIA.
You also want to believe that Biden's accuser is 100% credible, despite multiple indicators that she may not be.
After what, 23 years, she comes out of the woodwork? No profit motive. No siree Bob.
I prefer to concentrate my attention on the Trump virus.
The Eastern Echo. That pillar of Eastern Michgan College student journalism....
Published on Mondays during the Fall and Winter.
Try harder, Boilerman.
No no no, Todd, it's a bigly totally credible journalistic source! How do we know this? It says what Boilerman wants to hear!
I provided an article with specific data about how often the Kavanaugh and Biden situtations were addressed in the first month after the accusation was made. I believe data is generated by reviewing the text of all things said on MSNBC, for example, and then doing a Control F search for how many times Ford or Reade was mentioned. Ford was discussed plenty times and Reade has been discussed few times.
Please provide data which disputes the data that I provided.
I provided the research company that tracks mentions on tv & the numbers.
Of course the TDS crowd ignored it.
Originally posted by: tom
I provided the research company that tracks mentions on tv & the numbers.
Of course the TDS crowd ignored it.
Tom, everyone knows that the data is easy to find. I provided it, you provided it. They won't do their own research because they know that you and I are correct. One simply needs to watch the news to know that the coverage has been remarkably different.
You and Tom are totally, 1000% correct, the totally biased liberal fake news media aren't giving Biden's accuser the airtime and the TOTAL, UNQUESTIONED credibility she deserves. After all, what's more important, a global pandemic or a sexual assault accusation from 23 years ago?
That's what you want to hear, right? Validation?
Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis
You and Tom are totally, 1000% correct, the totally biased liberal fake news media aren't giving Biden's accuser the airtime and the TOTAL, UNQUESTIONED credibility she deserves. After all, what's more important, a global pandemic or a sexual assault accusation from 23 years ago?
That's what you want to hear, right? Validation?
What's new in the pandemic in the past week? Nothing substantial.
