Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis
I have to check and see if our municipal network has sewers or SEWERS. I assume that you only need SEWERS if you have WATER to drain rather than plain old water. We get a lot of rain up here, but usually not RAIN. So maybe we can get by with sewers and don't need SEWERS.
Davey Dog is indisputably an ASSHOLE and an IDIOT who has TRUMP CAPITALIZATION SYNDROME.
L O fucking L!
This is why the Sink is now the SEWER.
Originally posted by: David Miller
This is why the Sink is now the SEWER.
So barketh DAVEY DOG.
Here is the perfect example why the Sink is indeed a Sewer: A topic, a current event on most folks' minds right now, is posted. No nasty personal zings.
The 2nd post is a response to the first. Reasoned debate. some counterpoint but no ugly personal barbs. It could have ended there...point made. Or more reasoned debate if someone had something worthwhile to add.
Unfortunately what follows is garbage, ugly childish garbage slung at specific persons by name. Sadly, the recipients of the insults can't hold back on retorts; and it all goes down hill from there. Beyond silly.
JMHO.
Candy
Originally posted by: PJ Stroh
Subway sandwich worker shot because sandwich was light on mayo
What could possibly go wrong with the Supreme Courts decision to let everyone carry a concealed gun? Probably more shit like this. Just a guess.
Everyone can not carry a gun legally. You know that's not the case so why do you say it is?
Good God, Candy, do you consider David Miller's initial response "reasoned debate"?????? "Liberals blan blah liberals blah blah liberals blah blah destroying the country." Followed by an assertion that shooting someone who gets your sandwich order wrong is indeed self-defense.
There can be no rational defense to gun love, or to any assertion that it's OK to try to kill the guy at Subway who's making your sandwich. If David Miller or anyone else says that it IS OK, he'll attract "personal zings" every time. And not just from me.
Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis
Good God, Candy, do you consider David Miller's initial response "reasoned debate"?????? "Liberals blan blah liberals blah blah liberals blah blah destroying the country." Followed by an assertion that shooting someone who gets your sandwich order wrong is indeed self-defense.
There can be no rational defense to gun love, or to any assertion that it's OK to try to kill the guy at Subway who's making your sandwich. If David Miller or anyone else says that it IS OK, he'll attract "personal zings" every time. And not just from me.
I beileve that this say all need be said - Delusional -de·lu·sion·al /dəˈlo͞oZH(ə)nəl/ adjective characterized by or holding idiosyncratic beliefs or impressions that are contradicted by reality or rational argument, typically as a symptom of mental disorder.
Originally posted by: David Miller
I beileve that this say all need be said - Delusional -de·lu·sion·al /dəˈlo͞oZH(ə)nəl/ adjective characterized by or holding idiosyncratic beliefs or impressions that are contradicted by reality or rational argument, typically as a symptom of mental disorder.
"It say" you is an asshole. Oh, and fuck you.
Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis
"It say" you is an asshole. Oh, and fuck you.
More sewage from the Sink destroyer
Originally posted by: PJ Stroh
Subway sandwich worker shot because sandwich was light on mayo
What could possibly go wrong with the Supreme Courts decision to let everyone carry a concealed gun? Probably more shit like this. Just a guess.
PJ's statement is wrong as the SC decision does NOT allow EVERYONE to carry a gun. Melvin Williams was the shooter and has a criminal history, so he would never been allowed a gun permit.
It is usually a good idea to wait until the entire story comes out.
Originally posted by: tom
PJ's statement is wrong as the SC decision does NOT allow EVERYONE to carry a gun. Melvin Williams was the shooter and has a criminal history, so he would never been allowed a gun permit.
It is usually a good idea to wait until the entire story comes out.
The decision allows states to set their own criteria. So if Arkie-saw or Tay-ucks-ass want to allow criminals to carry guns, they can. And they will.
Here's a certainty: a criminal who is denied a gun permit will sue the state, claiming that the Court's decision means that his "right" to pack heat overrides any state rules. And he'll win.
