Don’t hold the mayo

Here is my suggestion.  Since Libs are 90% more likely to shoot people, don't allow Libs to have guns.  The problem is then largely solved.

Originally posted by: Boilerman

Here is my suggestion.  Since Libs are 90% more likely to shoot people, don't allow Libs to have guns.  The problem is then largely solved.


Since chickens have four heads and the sun revolves around the earth, we should shoot all Republicans. The problem then is largely solved.

Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis

Since chickens have four heads and the sun revolves around the earth, we should shoot all Republicans. The problem then is largely solved.


  Actually, a chicken has one head and the Earth revolves around the Sun. The only problem here is Lewis never states the truth.

Originally posted by: David Miller

  Actually, a chicken has one head and the Earth revolves around the Sun. The only problem here is Lewis never states the truth.


Davey Dog, you're a fucking idiot, but I know you understand what irony is. Why pretend to be even more of an idiot than you already are?


Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis

Davey Dog, you're a fucking idiot, but I know you understand what irony is. Why pretend to be even more of an idiot than you already are?


      Lewis again breaking the Forum rules with vulgarity and a sexually explicit attack and name calling. 

Originally posted by: tom

PJ's statement is wrong as the SC decision does NOT allow EVERYONE to carry a gun.  Melvin Williams was the shooter and has a criminal history, so he would never been allowed a gun permit.

 

It is usually a good idea to wait until the entire story comes out.


You dont know that.    It hasnt been challenged at the SUpreme COurt yet.   THIS SUPREME COURT who just said states cant pass conceal-carry laws.

 

 

The Supreme Court made a very broad interpretation of the 2nd AMmendment which saw no reason to allow the states to reel it in.    This particular ruling said the 2nd AMmendment is so pure that states cant implement conceal-carry laws inside their own borders.    Whose to say they wont allow a state to stop criminals from carrying guns too?     After all, the Constitution doesnt say they cant.    And Alito says the 2nd Ammendment leaves very little to be restricted    Would it  be any less crazy of an interpretation?

 

I guess we'll see.   Nothing surprises me at this point.  Not with this group of crazies.

I know your fucking feelings are hurt, impotent little limp-dicked Davey Dog. Oh, and fuck you and your faux outrage.

 

You made a gratuitous, pointless, ignorant asshole comment. You got the name-calling and :"vulgarity" you deserved.

 

But nothing I say is nearly as vulgar as your support for the traitorous insurrectionists.

Edited on Jun 29, 2022 4:18pm
Originally posted by: PJ Stroh

You dont know that.    It hasnt been challenged at the SUpreme COurt yet.   THIS SUPREME COURT who just said states cant pass conceal-carry laws.

 

 

The Supreme Court made a very broad interpretation of the 2nd AMmendment which saw no reason to allow the states to reel it in.    This particular ruling said the 2nd AMmendment is so pure that states cant implement conceal-carry laws inside their own borders.    Whose to say they wont allow a state to stop criminals from carrying guns too?     After all, the Constitution doesnt say they cant.    And Alito says the 2nd Ammendment leaves very little to be restricted    Would it  be any less crazy of an interpretation?

 

I guess we'll see.   Nothing surprises me at this point.  Not with this group of crazies.


I fully expect the Supreme RepubliQ Court to say that criminals are still citizens and the Second Amendment applies to them. After all, they need to defend themselves, like that guy in Uvalde who was attacked by a mob of schoolchildren.

Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis

I fully expect the Supreme RepubliQ Court to say that criminals are still citizens and the Second Amendment applies to them. After all, they need to defend themselves, like that guy in Uvalde who was attacked by a mob of schoolchildren.


 Please provide the source of your claim that a "mob of school children" attacked "that guy in Uvalde". 

Originally posted by: David Miller

 Please provide the source of your claim that a "mob of school children" attacked "that guy in Uvalde". 


Please shove your request up your wrinkled old ass.

 

But thanks for saying "please." It's a tiny step forward for you, but hey, progress.

Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now