Forgive Me, I Am Going To Be Racist - I Will No Longer Date White Women

Originally posted by: Mark

So, If an obese 60-year-old Asian woman with one eye and one leg knocked on your door and said, "I am yours take me, Boiler baby," would you be obligated to do so because you have never been with an Asian woman?


If she was a hot looking 50 year old Asian woman, I'd invite her in.  I would also happily invite LPGA golfer Daniel Kang, but I don't believe that this offer will be made any time soon.

Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis

You do realize that Tommie-poo has his own degrading nickname for me, which he uses in every post, including the one you just responded to?

 

I didn't think so.

 

Tommie-poo reasons and talks like a child (a developmentally disabled child, at that), so I address him as such.


No, I don't recognize his degrading nickname for you.  Still, do two wrongs ever make a right?   The bigger of you can stop it.

 

Candy

Originally posted by: Boilerman

If she was a hot looking 50 year old Asian woman, I'd invite her in.  I would also happily invite LPGA golfer Daniel Kang, but I don't believe that this offer will be made any time soon.


There is no such LPGA golfer. Unlikely that a woman would be named "Daniel."

Originally posted by: O2bnVegas

No, I don't recognize his degrading nickname for you.  Still, do two wrongs ever make a right?   The bigger of you can stop it.

 

Candy


I don't call him Tommie-poo in order to "make a right." Doing that would entail cleansing his mind of all that RepubliQ propaganda filth and boosting his reasoning ability several levels. That is beyond my power to bring about.


Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis

There is no such LPGA golfer. Unlikely that a woman would be named "Daniel."


Kevin is correct, the correct spelling is Danielle Kang.

Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis

I don't call him Tommie-poo in order to "make a right." Doing that would entail cleansing his mind of all that RepubliQ propaganda filth and boosting his reasoning ability several levels. That is beyond my power to bring about.


Kevin once again demands that people follow his "Thought Police" policies, cleansing their minds of anything that he disagrees with.

 

Book burnings to follow.  After all, Liberals are already doing the same through the distruction of free digital expression.

Originally posted by: Boilerman

Kevin once again demands that people follow his "Thought Police" policies, cleansing their minds of anything that he disagrees with.

 

Book burnings to follow.  After all, Liberals are already doing the same through the distruction of free digital expression.


Uh huh. You support voter suppression and racism. That's the real "Thought Police" problem.

 

I would like to see Tommie-poo cleansed of all his Trumpism. Trumpism is evil and stupid. It's not a matter of whether I agree or disagree with him. It's a matter of not allowing evil to flourish. I would similarly like to see the 75 million jerkasses who went Trump cleansed of their evil thoughts. Not by coercion--by education. It might be too late for Tommie-poo, though, and probably too late for you.

 

Hate speech and the deliberate spreading of lies are not protected free speech. "Free expression" is against the law if it attacks racial/ethnic/marginalized groups or individuals. Tommie-poo's free expression is nothing more than cut-and-paste from the rectum of Facebook--whatever nasty, evil shit appears that day that titillates him.

 

"Book burnings to follow" is a tired old slippery slope argument. We ban assault rifles, soon, the gummint will be taking away our GUNZ. We start an income tax, soon, America will descend into the dark pits of SOOOOCIALISM (this was, in fact, a major talking point back then). We put speed limits on the interstate, soon, the government will be taking away our right to drive. It's a stupid way to try to make your stupid point.

I forgot one.  I dated a Mexican lady in college while she studied for her masters degree in Pharmacology.

Edited on Jun 9, 2021 9:31am
Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis

Uh huh. You support voter suppression and racism. That's the real "Thought Police" problem.

 

I would like to see Tommie-poo cleansed of all his Trumpism. Trumpism is evil and stupid. It's not a matter of whether I agree or disagree with him. It's a matter of not allowing evil to flourish. I would similarly like to see the 75 million jerkasses who went Trump cleansed of their evil thoughts. Not by coercion--by education. It might be too late for Tommie-poo, though, and probably too late for you.

 

Hate speech and the deliberate spreading of lies are not protected free speech. "Free expression" is against the law if it attacks racial/ethnic/marginalized groups or individuals. Tommie-poo's free expression is nothing more than cut-and-paste from the rectum of Facebook--whatever nasty, evil shit appears that day that titillates him.

 

"Book burnings to follow" is a tired old slippery slope argument. We ban assault rifles, soon, the gummint will be taking away our GUNZ. We start an income tax, soon, America will descend into the dark pits of SOOOOCIALISM (this was, in fact, a major talking point back then). We put speed limits on the interstate, soon, the government will be taking away our right to drive. It's a stupid way to try to make your stupid point.


Kevin, we review this and you have no sensible argument about voter suppression...........except that absentee voters only have six weeks to get their vote in.  Wow, that's crazy suppression.  Kevin, like most Liberals, just keep repeating lies after they been proven wrong.

 

Next Kevin will tell us that Trump colluded with Russia.

Kevin Lewis opines;

""Free expression" is against the law if it attacks racial/ethnic/marginalized groups or individuals."

 

Apparently the United States Supreme Court disagrees with Kevin Lewis.

 

From: Wikipedia: Wikipedia: Hate Speech Laws by Country

"The United States does not have hate speech laws, since the U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled that laws criminalizing hate speech violate the guarantee to freedom of speech contained in the First Amendment to the U.S. ConstitutionThere are several categories of speech that are not protected by the First Amendment, such as speech that calls for imminent violence upon a person or group. However, the Supreme Court has ruled that hate speech that does not fall into one of these categories is constitutionally protected." 

 

What a Great Country ! ! !

Edited on Jun 9, 2021 1:12pm
Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now