Herschel Murdered His Baby

Herschel Walker, the football legend now running for Senate in Georgia, says he wants to completely ban abortion, likening it to murder and claiming there should be “no exception” for rape, incest, or the life of the mother.

 

But the Republican candidate has supported at least one exception—for himself.

A woman who asked not to be identified out of privacy concerns told The Daily Beast that, after she and Walker conceived a child while they were dating in 2009, he urged her to get an abortion. The woman said she had the procedure and that Walker reimbursed her for it.

 

She supported these claims with a $575 receipt from the abortion clinic, a “get well” card from Walker, and a bank deposit receipt that included an image of a signed $700 personal check from Walker.

 

By his standards, he murdered his child.  His new campaign slogan ought to be abortions for me not for thee.

 

Source 

Oh boy. That'll fuck him over with BOTH sides.

 

Can you believe that Republican moron voters made him their choice? And WHY? Because he used to be a football player?

 

The guy makes stupid Tommie-poo look smart.

But Dr. Oz murdered over 300 puppies. So which one of these guys is the most Republican?

His son, a conservative influencer, disowned him on Twitter after this news broke. Said Herschel left his mom and him to go bang all these women and that they had to move six times to flee all his violence. 

 

As to Dr. Oz what a sicko. 

Edited on Oct 4, 2022 5:37am

Sadly, it probably won't make any difference. The Access Hollywood tapes when they were released were thought to spell the end for t***p. It turns out hypocrisy and immorality are not dealbreakers in electoral politics.

Before someone from the other side, whatabouts the credible (but never proved) accusations against Bill Clinton of rape and other sex crimes that never hurt *him*: Exactly. The indifference is bipartisan. "Sure he's a b*stard, but he's *our* b*stard."

Originally posted by: Jeff

Sadly, it probably won't make any difference. The Access Hollywood tapes when they were released were thought to spell the end for t***p. It turns out hypocrisy and immorality are not dealbreakers in electoral politics.

Before someone from the other side, whatabouts the credible (but never proved) accusations against Bill Clinton of rape and other sex crimes that never hurt *him*: Exactly. The indifference is bipartisan. "Sure he's a b*stard, but he's *our* b*stard."


Bill Clinton was a choir boy compared to Trump and the current crop of Republicans. Even Ken Starr found the rape alligation against Clinton not credible. Futhermore, Clinton didn't campaign on being the moral choice.

 

 

 I am not buying your bothsideism.

For all of MIke Pence's ills at least you can say he is a true believer.  Rick Santorum too.    ANd I have about the same chance of winning the Republican primary as either of them

 

The rest of them are hypocrites who just pander to Jesus-freaks under the facade that they too are church-going crusaders out to confront the godless hedonism of the Democrats.   We dont need to count through the million examples of "Evangelical" Republican leaders who ultimately got busted cheating on their wife, attending sex parties, having a homosexual affair, assaulting a staffer, not paying child support, or raping kids. 

 

Their hypocrisy on this issue is almost as big as their one on "small government" 

Edited on Oct 4, 2022 8:10am
Originally posted by: Mark

Bill Clinton was a choir boy compared to Trump and the current crop of Republicans. Even Ken Starr found the rape alligation against Clinton not credible. Futhermore, Clinton didn't campaign on being the moral choice.

 

 

 I am not buying your bothsideism.


Both sides? I'll give you a both sides argument!

 

Biden is old.

Originally posted by: Jeff

Sadly, it probably won't make any difference. The Access Hollywood tapes when they were released were thought to spell the end for t***p. It turns out hypocrisy and immorality are not dealbreakers in electoral politics.

Before someone from the other side, whatabouts the credible (but never proved) accusations against Bill Clinton of rape and other sex crimes that never hurt *him*: Exactly. The indifference is bipartisan. "Sure he's a b*stard, but he's *our* b*stard."


In Walker's case, though, this isn't imorrality, but gut-wrenching hypocrisy. I agree that a RepubliQ signifier over the decades has been to affect moral purity and then fuck like rabbits while the wife's away, and yes, the faithful have blithely tolerated and winked at it, but this is different. Being an anti-abortion crusader now makes him look like a phony (which he is).

 

Of course, I'd like to think that his simply being dumber than a box of rocks would make him unelectable, but RepubliQ voters did in fact prop him up there.

Originally posted by: Mark

Bill Clinton was a choir boy compared to Trump and the current crop of Republicans. Even Ken Starr found the rape alligation against Clinton not credible. Futhermore, Clinton didn't campaign on being the moral choice.

 

 

 I am not buying your bothsideism.


"Bill Clinton was a choir boy compared to Trump "

I wasn't suggesting moral equivalence between Bill Clinton and Trump. 99.9% of the general population are choir boys compared to Trump.

I was addressing how the party faithful of both parties react, generally, to the scandal, corruption and immorality of their candidates. Generally, they continue to support them. I've been reading about Adam Clayton Powell, the long time powerful Democratic Congressman from Harlem. The House, including Democrats, kicked him out for gross misbehavior. His district reelected him in the next election.

Right now, with Trump holding his party captive due to his popularity among the rank and file, Republicans look very very bad, but over a longer period, I'm not sure they've been any worse than Democrats.

"Clinton didn't campaign on being the moral choice."

I'm not sure Trump did either.

I remember a Trump rally where he more or less admitted to being a tax cheat and swindler as a selling point. He was making the point, without quite saying it explicitly but coming very close, that because he, himself, had a record as a grifter, he would be the ideal man to catch other grifters for the same reason Internet security companies like to hire former black hat hackers.

After he completed his sales pitch for electing a former grifter, he shrugged, nodded as people laughed and did one of his creepy smiles saying with body language, "Let's face it. I'm a grifter. But as a former grifter, I'll know how to get those tax cheats and influence peddlers."

So in that sense, he wasn't presenting himself as the moral choice but quite the opposite.

On the other hand, when he came out at a CPAC meeting and hugged an American flag on a stand with an expression on his face as if he were cuming with a porn star or when he held a Bible (upside down) to give the impression that he led his life based on scripture he was sending the opposite message.

Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now